Sometimes it may be a fine line but when you go in front of congress after attending Cornell for 4 years and are in a $50,000/year law school asking for that Jesuit college to pay premiums for your birth control is absurd to me as well as it was to Rush. And I think if people looked at it outside the political ring, would agree. Originally Posted by montana1958Unfortunately Montana, any reasonable points you may have made are more than offset with this nonsense. Sandra Fluke was not testifying on behalf of Sandra Fluke. She was testifying on behalf of women. Those that go to $50,000/yr law schools, and those that make $20,000/yr working 2 jobs.
I've never had a prescription given to me that i couldn't afford out of my own pocket. But i've also never had a prescription written for me that i didn't think my insurance company should pay for. So i guess i'm one of those that thinks i should have other people pay so i don't have to deal with sneezing and puffy eyes in the spring, eh Montana?
You buy a $400,000 house and complain you can’t afford the taxes when you knew what they were when you bought it. ABSURD You buy a $75,000 Lexus and say you can’t afford $4.00/gallon gas. ABSURD You buy a $500,000 vacation home in Florida and complain that airfares are too much. ABSURDYou forgot one:
And if you're born with ovaries and complain that getting knocked up for 9 months is a medical situation you don't want to deal with? ABSURD.
What's ABSURD is the suggestion that people have no standing to advocate for something they may not truly require themselves. But, of course, if she was in a position of truly needing it, then the Rushbots would still claim she was only advocating for it out of personal selfishness. Seems she couldn't win.
Let's suppose, instead of birth control, she was advocating for medical marijuana to be covered under health insurance plans (assuming it were legal). And let's suppose it was known that she'd benefit medically from it (as she does from birth control vis a vis being a woman). Would you be out here claiming she was simply trying to get you to pay for her getting high? Seems so.