What Would It Take For You To Fight For Your Liberty?

It just truly shows how ignorant you are, BigTurd. And how flippantly you oppose freedom.

My family has shed blood in every war this country has fought, including our Revolution. I'll not surrender it to the likes of you without a fight.

It just truly shows how ignorant you are, BigTurd. And how flippantly you oppose freedom.

My family has shed blood in every war this country has fought, including our Revolution. I'll not surrender it to the likes of you without a fight. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Does this mean you're not planning to ask me nicely if you can fly Business Class?

No, but I will ask you nicely to go fuck yourself.

No. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Well, that's a start! Let me know if you change your mind on the Business Class option.

And you can trust that it will all be legal and "constitutional"...,that way supporters of the Imperial President like Bigtits and MunchMouth (Thanks For Your Service) can rest easy knowing it was done constitutionally.....

If I recall the Japanese internment camps were deemed legal and "constitutional". Think it can't happen again ?

So, when they come to take you off to the FEMA camp, you'll go peacefully? Originally Posted by joe bloe

That was the detainees fault, WW. If they hadn't been Japanese, the government wouldn't have found it necessary to inter them.

*note to BigTurd, Doofie, and the other mental midgets on this board. Look up "facetious".

You know I have to wonder what the democratic Germans thought when they saw their country falling to the Nazis? Imagine their choice; they could vote for the Nazis or they could vote for the Communists. Almost anything else was a wasted vote inspite of their European parlimentary government. We see a new darkness on the horizon and when we say something we get called foolish names by well...fools.

Who are you talking about, JD? None of the liberals ever call names, and they respond only with substance. We non-liberals are the only ones who lack substance and resort to ad hominem attacks.

Just take a look at your posts and mine. Never any substance. Never any serious points. It doesn't matter that we expose the vast encroachments on freedom conducted by the current administration. Since it doesn't agree with the liberals, it can't be true, and we must be making it up. Besides, the best way to preserve freedom is to make sure people like us are silenced. Freedom is strongest when there is no dissent. (Didn't Hillary say that during the Bush Administration? But I digress.)

So you see, JD. It's all our own fault for not bowing down to our current government. And that darkness on the horizon we see, is just the dawning of a new day of freedom, after all the dissenters are gone. We will be free to live however the government demands that we live. Won't it be great?

If I recall the Japanese internment camps were deemed legal and "constitutional". Think it can't happen again ? Originally Posted by Whirlaway

It is truly disconcerting how similar FDR's Executive Order 9066 is to Odumbo's NDAA.

"I hereby authorize and direct the Secretary of War, and the Military Commanders whom he may from time to time designate, whenever he or any designated Commander deems such action necessary or desirable, to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as he or the appropriate Military Commander may determine, from which any or all persons may be excluded, and with respect to which, the right of any person to enter, remain in, or leave shall be subject to whatever restrictions the Secretary of War or the appropriate Military Commander may impose in his discretion. The Secretary of War is hereby authorized to provide for residents of any such area who are excluded therefrom, such transportation, food, shelter, and other accommodations as may be necessary, in the judgment of the Secretary of War or the said Military Commander, and until other arrangements are made, to accomplish the purpose of this order. The designation of military areas in any region or locality shall supersede designations of prohibited and restricted areas by the Attorney General under the Proclamations of December 7 and 8, 1941, and shall supersede the responsibility and authority of the Attorney General under the said Proclamations in respect of such prohibited and restricted areas."

You know I have to wonder what the democratic Germans thought when they saw their country falling to the Nazis? Imagine their choice; they could vote for the Nazis or they could vote for the Communists. Almost anything else was a wasted vote inspite of their European parlimentary government. We see a new darkness on the horizon and when we say something we get called foolish names by well...fools. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Winston Churchill warned that Hitler was a madman and a real danger in the thirties. He warned of the "gathering storm." He was laughed at and considered to be a fool by The House of Commons. He was later proven to be right.

“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
Saul Alinsky

WW, COG, Joe, JD, IB, .......You guys know that when Liberals like Bigtex, Doove, Munch, and WTF are backed into a corner that's when the cursing and name-calling starts. I'm not Republican or TeaParty, but am a Independent Constitutionalist. The (o)bama Administration, the UN and (s)oros think the Bill of Rights and US Constitution don't apply to them. They are Socialists, Communists, and Totalitarians all desiring UN led globalism. But the Democrats and Liberals are blind and will see when its too late. If they have their way July 27th with the Arms Trade Treaty and stripping us of the Second Amendment rights, it's the beginning of the end for everyone.

WW, COG, Joe, JD, IB, .......You guys know that when Liberals like Bigtex, Doove, Munch, and WTF are backed into a corner that's when the cursing and name-calling starts.. Originally Posted by TrailBlazer

That is the correct concept but the wrong name applied, at least as far as I am concerned. I can't speak for the rest!

Normally I call WW, Whirly. On a couple of occasions, I have called him Whirlybird.

The worst I have called JD was well, JD.

By the same token IB has always been IB.

(At least one of the two (JD and IB) regularly calls me BigTits. In a strange sort of way, I always considered that a left-handed compliment. From a personal perspective, I have always liked Big Tits. Perhaps JD and/or IB just likes me in some very strange sort of way!

Of course COG is a different case. He has graduated from me always referring to him as COG to being a StupidOldFart or SOF for short but only after months of him calling me BigTurd or something similar.

I affectionately refer to Joe Bloe as Joe the Bloehard. It's not really cussing it just seems that it adds a little pizzazz to his name,
As for TrailBlazer, I really do not have much history with you. Is it ok if I just call you Ass Wipe or AW until I get to know you a little better?
As far as I am concerned it's like water off of a duck's back. The names just roll off.

That is the correct concept but the wrong name applied, at least as far as I am concerned. I can't speak for the rest!

Normally I call WW, Whirly. On a couple of occasions, I have called him Whirlybird.

The worst I have called JD was well, JD.

By the same token IB has always been IB.

(At least one of the two (JD and IB) regularly calls me BigTits. In a strange sort of way, I always considered that a left-handed compliment. From a personal perspective, I have always liked Big Tits. Perhaps JD and/or IB just likes me in some very strange sort of way!

Of course COG is a different case. He has graduated from me always referring to him as COG to being a StupidOldFart or SOF for short but only after months of him calling me BigTurd or something similar.

I affectionately refer to Joe Bloe as Joe the Bloehard. It's not really cussing it just seems that it adds a little pizzazz to his name,
As for TrailBlazer, I really do not have much history with you. Is it ok if I just call you Ass Wipe or AW until I get to know you a little better?
As far as I am concerned it's like water off of a duck's back. The names just roll off. Originally Posted by bigtex

"BigTicks" and maybe BigTurd", but not "BigTits".

He likes Big Tits??? Well that has to change. We can' say Big Dicks because that would probably be lying. Big Turd leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Stay tuned viewers...

"BigTicks" and maybe BigTurd", but not "BigTits". Originally Posted by I B Hankering

IB, Goes to show how much attention that I pay to the name calling. It is more water off of the duck's back. It just puddles up and rolls off!

While on the subject, perhaps it is time for Ass Wipe errrrrrr TrailBlazer to reconsider.