Ladies, Chest Tattos, seriously???? WTF

So I go see a new client today, and guess what...her daughter has this nasty ass chest tattoo. She wasn't much to look at anyway, but combining the chest piece with the state of the living conditions, it screamed out WHITE TRASH! Originally Posted by Red Tex

You really wanted to reply and keep this thread alive? Just quit while you're behind already.

Tex your post screams "douchebag"

Tattman, not that I agree with Tex, but you are the one using there and their improperly.

What, no brown? Originally Posted by Tiffani Jameson

Only thing my old man said that made any sense was "It's all pink on the inside"

Opinions are like assholes everyone has them! with that being said What was the point of your little rant other than putting others down?? really??

The point of it is why destroy the beauty that God provided by messing with amazing breasts. It is flat ass ugly.

OP is a classic example of having an education, and being intelligent are not necessarily the same.

Some of the dumbest people I know, have MBA's from top notch colleges.

Everyone is entitiled to have an opinion...but IMO, the starting of this thread shows that common sense is not very common, any more

Red Tex,
Please do not generalize! I am in the business and I am nowhere near what you describe. I have a graduate degree, own a nice home and car. My parents are still married and they live in a very very nice home (not a trailer). And I have many talents and a great life outside of this. Men like you I always avoid. Men like you look at us women as low-class, piece of object that you can use/buy with your money. You don't respect us women as women. You say we are low-class but you continue to see us. What does that make you? Originally Posted by samantha thom

And with that background, do you have tattoos? My guess in probably no. Inquiring minds want to know.

I'm not as strident as RedTex, but I do think that tattoos are much more acceptable in some circles than in others and some of that has to do with Socieconomic status. I deal with lots of laywers, mostly litigators from high dollar firms from out of state. You never seen tats on any of those folks, nor would I imagine that any of those firms would ever hire somebody for courtroom work that had any visible tattoo. Same with most of their legal assistants. But you get into the courtroom video technicians, and computer operators, etc., you see it more. Some of our litigation deals with lots of expert witnesses, most of whom have PhD or masters degrees. Again, you don't see any tats in that group. And that may be because those folks testify in court a lot, but I do think that if you took a group of 1,000 folks who had a JD, PhD, or MBA and compared it to a group of similar age that had a high school education, you'd see a lot more tats in the second group.

TexTushHog....I think the key thing you said was "see no visible tatto". In today's times, old rules don't always apply. Been on any recent campuses lately???

And with that background, do you have tattoos? My guess in probably no. Inquiring minds want to know. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

You're right. I do not have any tattoos, not a fan of them. I was responding to RedTex's generalization of providers' background.
Other people can have tattoos...I don't care. It's their bodies. But I'd rather express myself in music, dancing or sports instead of putting ink on my beautiful skin.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=510542

Here is a prime example of what I am talking about.

What the hell is up with that chest tattoo? How could someone not know better?

As folks mentioned tattoos are another form of art. Like any artistic expression, people of their own views of it. If a person paints on a canvass, it is form of artistic expression. If a person paints the side of a bridge, some would consider that art while others would consider it a form of defacement. Does the placement determine if it is art?

Tattoos on the chest, especially not easily covered by clothing, would be the same. Some consider it art while others don't. As for a tattoo of a pimp's brand on the chest, could folks consider a brand logo (e.g. London 2012 logo) artistic?

My preference would be locations where they can be easily covered with clothing if a situation ever calls for it.