It's equal before the law, it has nothing to do with making sure everyone has the exact same opportunities or abilities. It means the law cannot single you out, to take away your unalienable rights, without due process. It doesn't mean everyone gets a computer, or a nice house, or a car. It means the government has no right to interfere with your pursuit of those things, and others, so long as you do not interfere with someone's else's right to do the same.That is a nice philosophical argument, and I do not disagree with any of those words. The problem is deciding exactly what the law is that we are all equal before. The examples I mentioned are all cases where from one point of view it is seen as a reasonable law, but from another's POV it is interfereing with a group of people's right to life, liberty, etc.
If I have a computer, it doesn't infringe on anyone else's right to have one. If I break my leg, it doesn't mean everyone else has to break their leg to make it "even".
You are deliberately being obtuse just for the sake of riling things up on here. I just called you on it.
It's a stupid question, and you are trying to make it complex. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy