I haven't said his handle. However if a provider had gotten a "loan" from a hobbyist with a session not taking place then disappeared she would be blasted. I have seen it happen. How is that any different ??? Originally Posted by Naughty_JezabelleIt is different in that this has nothing to do with a Session. That you are Hobbyist and Provider is incidental - you are/were Poker Players, in this instance.
I haven't said his handle. However if a provider had gotten a "loan" from a hobbyist with a session not taking place then disappeared she would be blasted. I have seen it happen. How is that any different ??? Originally Posted by Naughty_JezabelleYes it happens that providers are named but that is not an absolute. I bet there are many times where the hobbiest quietly writes it off as a bad decision. If you want to name him, do it. He deserves what he gets but continuing this is getting old.