Grupo Bimbo .... How about an international holding group?Bimbo sounds likes a good choice.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambro...phaned-brands/
They have direct access to the Mexican sugar industry. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Grupo Bimbo .... How about an international holding group?Bimbo sounds likes a good choice.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambro...phaned-brands/
They have direct access to the Mexican sugar industry. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Bimbo sounds likes a good choice. Originally Posted by BigLouieThey know how, and have the international marketing network as well.
Bimbo sounds likes a good choice. Originally Posted by BigLouieGrupo Bimbo brands:
Bimbo Bakeries USA (BBU) bakes and distributes leading brands such as Arnold®, Ball Park®, Bimbo®, Boboli®, Brownberry®, EarthGrains®, Entenmann's®, Francisco®, Freihofer's®, Iron Kids®, Marinela®, Mrs Baird's®, Oroweat®, Sara Lee®, Stroehmann®, Thomas'®, and Tia Rosa®. The company, headquartered in Horsham, Pennsylvania, operates over 13,000 sales routes throughout the United States.
BBU, a division of Mexico's Grupo Bimbo, is one of the world's largest baking companies in the world in terms of production and sales volume. Grupo Bimbo operates in 19 countries throughout the Americas, Asia and Europe with over 126,000 associates. Bimbo's stock trades on the Mexican Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BIMBO.
Most of those "other" bakeries are also HostessAll these snack names have sexual conotations. How can they go out of buisness, lol.
Hostess Brands include Twinkies®, CupCakes®, Ding Dongs®, Ho Ho’s®, Sno Balls®, Donettes®, Drake's® cakes and Dolly Madison®.
Bread brands include Wonder®, Nature’s Pride®, Merita®, Home Pride®, Butternut®, and Millbrook®, among others. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser
I don't suppose you have any evidence to support your claim, do you, BigLoser? Didn't think so. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyI would like to see that myself Louie, that would affect my opinion of this situation. I know I read earlier that Hostess was offering the union an ownership stake in the company in exchange for the wage concession. I'll have to go find that again.
The BCTGM in September rejected a last, best and final offer from Hostess Brands designed to lower costs so that the Company could attract new financing and emerge from Chapter 11. Hostess Brands then received Court authority on Oct. 3 to unilaterally impose changes to the BCTGM’s collective bargaining agreements.
Hostess Brands is unprofitable under its current cost structure, much of which is determined by union wages and pension costs. The offer to the BCTGM included wage, benefit and work rule concessions but also gave Hostess Brands’ 12 unions a 25 percent ownership stake in the company, representation on its Board of Directors and $100 million in reorganized Hostess Brands’ debt.
Wall Street Journal : Creditors of Hostess Brands are questioning large executive pay raises made prior to the baking company's bankruptcy filing..............This is Bain capitalism at its worst........a company using bankruptcy as a bargaining chip........it failed so they are liquidating a profitable company......... . Originally Posted by BigLouie