MAKE THE WHITE HOUSE A GUN FREE ZONE

I already did you just dont like the answers because it proves my point...the politicians in DC being the worse offenders if the 2nd ammendment....

Here again in is A Democratic legislator calling for gun ban and confiscations ...


http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/09/io...matic-weapons/
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
I already did you just dont like the answers because it proves my point...the politicians in DC being the worse offenders if the 2nd ammendment....

Here again in is A Democratic legislator calling for gun ban and confiscations ...


http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/09/io...matic-weapons/ Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Just once, I'd like to see you back up statements you make as fact with any sort of facts. The article you cited is an Iowa state representative. Then you go on to talk about politicians in DC being the worst offenders of the 2nd Amendment. Unless somebody moved Iowa to within the city limits of DC, the article you cited is totally irrelevant.

Please try again.
I did back up my OP, you just keep changing the requirements that you want.......you are hopeless...

And yes, DC is the worse offender....they lost in a significant SCOTUS case called Heller..........it was a landmark decision by SCOTUS........

You want to hang on to some baloney that the left doesn't want to erode the 2nd Amendment, be my guest.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
and you can't get your story straight.

tax and spend. as long as its in your self interest.

Hypocrite.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
I did back up my OP, you just keep changing the requirements that you want.......you are hopeless...

And yes, DC is the worse offender....they lost in a significant SCOTUS case called Heller..........it was a landmark decision by SCOTUS........

You want to hang on to some baloney that the left doesn't want to erode the 2nd Amendment, be my guest. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
I give up. IF the old saying "Ignorance is bliss" is true, you must indeed be a very happy man.
As you should give up; My original post is clear and factual...
"Gun Free Zones are supposed to protect our children, and some politicians wish to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms. Those same politicians and their families are currently under the protection of armed Secret Service agents. If Gun Free Zones are sufficient protection for our children, then Gun Free Zones should be good enough for politicians. ........"
You would look more intelligent if you presented a counter argument....I would welcome reading your arguments on how Obama and others do not want to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms............that would be a funny read on this Monday morning...
A gun free zone only informs citizens they cannot have observed or concealed carry firearmes around the area.It is not supposed to frighten a criminal bent on destruction out you silly ass.
You'r right; mass murders love "gun free zones."


A gun free zone only informs citizens they cannot have observed or concealed carry firearmes around the area.It is not supposed to frighten a criminal bent on destruction out you silly ass. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
You'r right; mass murders love "gun free zones." Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Can't read can you?Ass hat it does not mean a authorized person doesn't have a firearm there.It means the general public cannot bring one there.
Same in schools; but the mass murder happens....................... .gun free zones are a green light to mass killers....hasn't history taught you anything ?
Please post a link to a mass killing that has take place at the most gun carry of locations - a gun show/swap meet .......it's never happened !


And even our military bases are "gun free zones"...and see what happened at Fort Hood.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Have you learned how to append a post, DIPSHIT?

That way you don't...
Yssup Rider's Avatar
... have
Yssup Rider's Avatar
to post...
Yssup Rider's Avatar
EVERY FUCKING SENTENCE YOU WRITE SEPARATELY! Talk about a post whore!