Explaining the fence sitter, COG.

WPF was never above the fray. He started this thread solely to bash me with some quote he didn't understand, then he starts talking about different "realities" like he knows anything about other people's feelings. If you have seen his posts on other threads, you'd know he is a dangerously sick man. Now he is extra pissed because I caught him posting from a Wiki article, and claiming those words to be his. I exposed him for the liar and fraud that he is.

Now, let's get back to the fun. No, wait. WPF will have at least one more post accusing me of being a homosexual liar who poops. Good god, man. Grow up and get some help!

Help sucking cock or pooping? You're the, ahem, man who could GIVE IT to him, whiny!

Your entire premise is flawed. All else can not be equal.

This is tired argument. You're attempting to discredit the quote, not on its merit, but rather on an trait of its author that is insignificant. When called on it, you pull out an extreme analogy to make the point. The analogy used is not a fair comparison, hence my humor in response.

If it came out that Stephen King were a drug addict, would that make his novels any less compelling to his fans? The author made an observation on human behavior, the validity of which can be debated without the distraction of what his vice may or may not have been. Originally Posted by fetishfreak

It can be if you're posing a hypothetical premise which is what I was doing. God you're a moron!

I was just being facetious when I made the observation about Dick in the first place.

It can be if you're posing a hypothetical premise which is what I was doing. God you're a moron!

I was just being facetious when I made the observation about Dick in the first place. Originally Posted by joe bloe

You were being a facetious Dick?

Got it.

It can be if you're posing a hypothetical premise which is what I was doing. God you're a moron!

I was just being facetious when I made the observation about Dick in the first place. Originally Posted by joe bloe

You never cease to amaze me. A simple admission that statement you made provided no context to the issue would have sufficed.

Instead you choose to back pedal by saying you were being facetious. I still can not understand how calling God a moron explains your inability to comunicate effectively.

That was a funny joke there Bloe Sloe!