NOT A GOOD MORNING FOR HILLARY !!!!!

How would you know, BTLD? You brag about not reading my posts. So you really have no idea, do you? That is why you're an idiot, and no one cares what you think.

How would you know, BTLD? You brag about not reading my posts. So you really have no idea, do you? That is why you're an idiot, and no one cares what you think. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I don't brag about not reading your posts. I normally do not follow your worthless links but that certainly does not mean that I do not read your posts. I have read enough of your posts to know that you are a fence-sitting idiot!

How's that for being up to date on StupidOldLyingFart's posts?

............ There is not one damn thing this administration does that you won't defend. Originally Posted by Budman

Obama apologists.

Obama apologists. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

If I am not mistaken you were (and probably still are) a GW apologist. "Nuff said!

Yes.......you are mistaken. As usual.

Yes.......you are mistaken. As usual. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

I only made one mistake in my life but I'll be damned if I can remember when it was!

We used to think that you were conceited....

But to be conceited is a flaw..............and we all know you don't have any.

I only made one mistake in my life but I'll be damned if I can remember when it was! Originally Posted by bigtex

I got it!

It was in the voting booth...........and you made the same mistake over and over again!

Why don't you tell that to your "big font" buddies, I B Lying & Crying and StupidOldLyingFart? Originally Posted by bigtex

Aren’t you the whiny-fucking hypocrite, BigKoTex!!!

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...2&postcount=17

I only made one mistake in my life but I'll be damned if I can remember when it was! Originally Posted by bigtex

I got it!

It was in the voting booth...........and you made the same mistake over and over again! Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

+1

From where I sit, it looked like Hillary held her own and even sent the Right Wing TV and Radio personalities into apoplexy.

Limbaugh and Hannity melted down almost as big time as most of you DIPSHITS on this board.

And she didn't need big fonts to do it.

Say hello to our first woman President, assholes!

But this is responsibility in its unique Washington sense of responsibility without consequences. Clinton remains in her cabinet position and, while four underlings have been reassigned, she herself has suffered no consequences as a result of the disaster for which she says she is responsible. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Oh? Washington responsibility seems like the "corporate responsibility" of your mostly right wing CEOs, only without the golden parachutes? Tell me which CEO involved in most of the scandals of the last ten or twenty years even took responsibility and when they did gave up their posts or in most cases even fired an underling??? Seems that Washington may have a bit higher level of responsibility than those folks.

Also, who in GB43's administration even took the responsibility for the neglect and fuck ups in Afghanistan and especially for those in Iraq? Did Rummy resign when we weren't met with flowers? Who took the fall for not securing the ammo and weapons dumps that armed the insurgency, or for the huge pile of cash that just disappeared? Got any responses on those?

Jesus Christ all you righty guys are such incredible fucking hypocrites on this type of thing. Everything is OK when you are a righty, but the exact same or better is treason if you are a Dem. Wake the fuck up.

Senator Rand Paul criticized Clinton for her alleged ignorance of the security concerns that were repeatedly expressed by Ambassador Chris Stevens and other diplomats in Libya. Paul said that if he had been president, he would have fired her: Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Duh, Rand Paul will never, NEVER be president, but if he were he would never appoint a woman and certainly not a DEM woman to any post. He wouldn't even have a Dem in his cabinet. Furthermore, OF COURSE he would fire Hillary, she's a Dem woman. I double damn guarantee you that he would NOT fire any person he appointed to the Sec. of State position. GB didn't fire Rummy, or Condi or anybody else for 9/11 or all the post 9/11 fuckups in Iraq or Afghanistan and neither would Rand.

In another widely-reported exchange, Clinton blew up at Senator Ron Johnson, who asked her about the administration’s false but oft-repeated claim that the Benghazi attack was part of a protest against an anti-Islamic YouTube video. “What difference would it make?” Hillary shouted: Originally Posted by Whirlaway

She's right, it doesn't matter what the reason is (would it matter why 9/11 happened? No, it did, we found who and why isn't too important), they called it an act of terror immediately and didn't have all the info to determine if it was connected to all the other protests at other embassies and consulates that same day. It is a red herring. Furthermore, no one really knows how much the assault in Benghazi was planned or coordinated since they don't 100% know who did it nor have they caught any perpetrators yet.

Shit happens, hindsight is 20/20, terrorists do bad things and we can't predict or prevent them all. Period. We can learn from past mistakes, but we are all human and not perfect. No human organization is perfect either. We weren't even responsible for the video, even if it was or wasn't the inciting issue, and the video was old news anyway fanned up by clerics in other countries to incite anti-American feelings and violence. Like these terrorists need a reason? No, they don't, but they need some stupid issue to incite riots and crowds to protest violently. That is it, period. Done.

Oh? Washington responsibility seems like the "corporate responsibility" of your mostly right wing CEOs, only without the golden parachutes? You're seriously warped. Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator (a Dimocrat) signed the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 which was avidly promoted by fellow Dimocrat, Larry Summers: who was his Secretary of Treasury – and Summers subsequently served in the Odumbo administration. Timothy Geithner (I), a Robert Rubins (a Dimocrat) and Summers protégé, was in charge of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York during the melt down, and he was appointed as Secretary of Treasury by Odumbo. CEO Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide Financial is a Dimocrat and was a major Dimocrat contributor. Jon Corzine, a former CEO of Goldman Sachs, is a Dimocrat. James "Jamie" Dimon was a former CEO of JPMorgan Chase and has remained a major Dimocrat bundler for Odumbo. Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs, is a major Dimocrat supporter who has had liberal access to Geitner.Vikram Pandit was formerly COO of Morgan Stanley and subsequently CEO of Citigroup is one of Geitner's buddy-buddies. 'Sheila Bair, who was then the head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, wanted to get rid of Pandit but was rebuffed by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Democratic Party stalwart Robert Rubin. "Vikram had gotten his job with Bob Rubin's support," she told Bloomberg Television. "There was a close working relationship there that troubled me."' http://money.msn.com/top-stocks/post...e-fc5349c182d7

Tell me which CEO involved in most of the scandals of the last ten or twenty years even took responsibility and when they did gave up their posts or in most cases even fired an underling??? Seems that Washington may have a bit higher level of responsibility than those folks.

Also, who in GB43's administration even took the responsibility for the neglect and fuck ups in Afghanistan and especially for those in Iraq? Did Rummy resign when we weren't met with flowers? Who took the fall for not securing the ammo and weapons dumps that armed the insurgency, or for the huge pile of cash that just disappeared? Got any responses on those?

Jesus Christ all you righty guys are such incredible fucking hypocrites on this type of thing. Everything is OK when you are a righty, but the exact same or better is treason if you are a Dem. Wake the fuck up.



Duh, Rand Paul will never, NEVER be president, but if he were he would never appoint a woman and certainly not a DEM woman to any post. He wouldn't even have a Dem in his cabinet. Furthermore, OF COURSE he would fire Hillary, she's a Dem woman. I double damn guarantee you that he would NOT fire any person he appointed to the Sec. of State position. GB didn't fire Rummy, or Condi or anybody else for 9/11 or all the post 9/11 fuckups in Iraq or Afghanistan and neither would Rand.



She's right, it doesn't matter what the reason is (would it matter why 9/11 happened? Bullshit!!! The administration lied to the public from day one. If it makes no fucking difference, why did they lie??? No, it did, we found who and why isn't too important), they called it an act of terror immediately and didn't have all the info to determine if it was connected to all the other protests at other embassies and consulates that same day. It is a red herring. Furthermore, no one really knows how much the assault in Benghazi was planned or coordinated since they don't 100% know who did it nor have they caught any perpetrators yet.

Shit happens, hindsight is 20/20, terrorists do bad things and we can't predict or prevent them all. Period. We can learn from past mistakes, but we are all human and not perfect. No human organization is perfect either. We weren't even responsible for the video, even if it was or wasn't the inciting issue, and the video was old news anyway fanned up by clerics in other countries to incite anti-American feelings and violence. Like these terrorists need a reason? No, they don't, but they need some stupid issue to incite riots and crowds to protest violently. That is it, period. Done. Originally Posted by austxjr

.

My thoughts:
I did not get to listen to all of the inquisition but I did find her answer to a question quite interesting.
Her response that she could not interfere with the processes when queried about the false information spread by the administration was enlightening.
It appears that she is claiming that the misinformation process was from a higher power than herself and there was nothing she could do about what they were doing. Not sure how one of her underlings was duped into spreading the story, so it must have been a higher authority that went around Hillary to have Ms Rice make the "process" statements.

Her admission that she is responsible for mismanagement of the State department will all but kill her chances for a presidential run, except of course that Democrats don't care about character or integrity or the ability to do the job.

Her admission that she is responsible for mismanagement of the State department will all but kill her chances for a presidential run, except of course that Democrats don't care about character or integrity or the ability to do the job. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Apparently, neither does the electorate.