Uh-h-h...you mean the complete lie that only those with Premium Access can see? Originally Posted by Bush Pilot
Uhhhh, no.
She means the novel comment he made under his review for all to see ie post 38.
Uh-h-h...you mean the complete lie that only those with Premium Access can see? Originally Posted by Bush Pilot
So, underthesun doesn't think you can discern information from a persons post. Well, everyone seems to have drawn a very correct conclusion from his. Originally Posted by MossmanActually rockerrick said that , but there are exceptions to every rule . I mean really how can you tell from fictional writings . It's not a journal .
Actually rockerrick said that , but there are exceptions to every rule . I mean really how can you tell from fictional writings . It's not a journal .In this case he revealed a lot about himself. He was not writing about a fictional person. He deliberately insulted a real person and tried to affect her income. He could have stated the facts in an unoffensive way but chose not to. That does give people an indication of his character.
How much of what is written is representitive of their true being ? Is Stephen King a psycho killer with a sledgehammer , or a rabid St . Bernard ? Originally Posted by rockerrick