Review: Jae - No Show

Treating someone with respect and courtesy is not kissing up. Yes, some of them do not deserve any more than some hobbyists do but you should not assume that up front. Originally Posted by Laz

This particular whore has demonstrated more than once a total disregard for men's time as well as many other things.

She deserves nothing more than her reputation is earning her.

We are not talking about providers in general.

In this particular case though the estrogen is running thick amongst posters with male handles.

This particular whore
.... Originally Posted by Whispers

Hmmm.
Doing the Andrew Carnegie, eh?


I only quote that much since I don't think you are just referencing her as that.

I wish you'd use the terms that apply to the males on this site as lovingly as you refer to the women.

Hmmm.
Doing the Andrew Carnegie, eh?


I only quote that much since I don't think you are just referencing her as that.

I wish you'd use the terms that apply to the males on this site as lovingly as you refer to the women. Originally Posted by Precious_b

Technically, whore is correct.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=934518

Technically, whore is correct.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=934518 Originally Posted by LilMynx69

I am not disputing that.

Just drawing attention to the way the Whispers refers to the women on this site.

There are sugar coated words, clinically clean descriptors, casual identifiers all the way to the words that are used to shine the most horrid light on describing someone.

It seems Whispers more often than not (and i'm not going back to check so call me out if i'm wrong) uses the words to reference women on this site in the most derogatory fashion.

Fine. If he so chooses, I don't mind..... *IF* he uses similar descriptors for himself and other gents on this site.

[Staff edit. M]

I am not disputing that.

Just drawing attention to the way the Whispers refers to the women on this site.

There are sugar coated words, clinically clean descriptors, casual identifiers all the way to the words that are used to shine the most horrid light on describing someone.

It seems Whispers more often than not (and i'm not going back to check so call me out if i'm wrong) uses the words to reference women on this site in the most derogatory fashion.

Fine. If he so chooses, I don't mind..... *IF* he uses similar descriptors for himself and other gents on this site.

[Staff edit. M] Originally Posted by Precious_b

Fair enough. xoxo

The way many of you guys put these ladies on pedestals.... well... that's the type of behavior that begs to get dissed by them....

I can't believe how some of you guys belittle yourselves defending some whore that won't give you the time of day without the price of admission.....

I wonder what kind of pussy some of you guys pull IRL without your wallets.....

It has to be pretty sad to end up crawling like you do... Originally Posted by Whispers

I'm sure the same could be said about you and your stripper "whores" w/re: wallet/spending time. We'll get back to that shortly.

So Whispers, you're totally fine with misinformation?

So long as it's a "John" discussing a "whore", his information is to be received as valid, irrefutable FACT and and as such, this misinformation is beyond reproach? Is that what you're suggesting?

That's pretty much the way I seeing it.

Taking that one step further, ..So if you inquire about scheduling an appointment, and you never hear back from her, and you then post a NCNS review on her, then this information is to be accepted, without question. Right?

If any guy challenges it, all of the sudden, the gal is placed on a pedistal and the challenge it, are her pathetic lapdogs

That's fucking ridiculous, not to mention HYPOCRITICAL...Think Trees and whom you were defending all the while failibg to get anyone to support your allegations.

How about you view the merits of the argument instead of the players involved?

*********************
Back to the wallet/time
I have no delusion that these gals are here for the money, nor that a lot of them would not be spending time with us otherwise. (Notice how I included myself by using the word, "us"?).

I think it's cute how you try to paint yourself as being "above all of this" and
"better than any of us", by using the term, "you" By doing so and excluding yourself, that's what's being implied; that you're above having to rely on your wallet and that gals just tend to gravitate towards you without you having to resort to lowlife tactics like we use; our $......that you dont have to..m

Then you go on to further condescend us by telling us we are pathetic grovelers with no game.

Alright, Whispers, let's go...

Since you've got such mad game I'm issuing a challenge.

Challenge:

You and me, armed with just our 'wit' and 'game',
(equal and minimal amounts of cash in our pockets),-all things equal.. go into an unfamiliar club, (one we've never been into, don't know the patrons/mgt/owners, etc)...
and see who pulls more pussy?

Let's just see who's got real fucking game and who has to rely (heavily) on their wallets and who doesn't?

Back-up that shit-talking.

Let's do it. Come on. You and me. We can even go two out of three, or three out of five, if that makes you more comfortable...It doesn't matter to me, so whatever.

As far as the winning prize is concerned...we can figure that out later, too,

My only stipulation is that the loser has to include
"Without My Wallet, I Have No Game. Money Is The Only Reason Women Talk To Me. I Am A Pathletic Loser",along with a link to the results, in their signature line, (in large, bold font) for the remainder of their existence on this board. Nothing else may be included nor changes made.
That's my only stipulation, the rest of this can be worked out pretty easily..

So what say? Are you willing to back-up your shit-talk and accept the challenge or are you going to wuss-out?

(If you decline, I think I'm ma start calling you Wuss-Puss, though....ijs.)

Anxiously awaiting your reply,
SofaKingFun

.

.

Rawwwwrrrr. All this challenge talk is making me wet!

Challenge:

You and me, armed with just our 'wit' and 'game',
(equal and minimal amounts of cash in our pockets),-all things equal.. go into an unfamiliar club, (one we've never been into, don't know the patrons/mgt/owners, etc)...
and see who pulls more pussy?

Hey SofaKingfun I would love to be there to witness this all,of course as a unbiased observer.

I know some consider me a pussy, so, you can count me as the first conquest in your corner SK

Rawwwwrrrr. All this challenge talk is making me wet! Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Are you sure it's the 'challenge talk', that's causing the wetness, my dear, lilMynx, and not because I mentioned,
'wallets'?

Not that it much matters, because wetness is a beautiful thing. Always glad to be of assistance in that regard.

Wallet. Wallet. Wallet.

Heh!

Regards,
SofaKingFun-pathetic groveler with no game.

P_b, TFF! Thanks for the chuckle. "You had me at Challenge".Lmao!
.

.

I am not disputing that.

Just drawing attention to the way the Whispers refers to the women on this site.


You would like to think that precious but all you are doing is drawing attention to the way I am addressing one particular women on this site at the moment. I have a great deal of respect for the vast majority of women on the site.... More so probably for the avg guy that posts here in San Antonio at the moment....


There are sugar coated words, clinically clean descriptors, casual identifiers all the way to the words that are used to shine the most horrid light on describing someone.

This particular individual deserves the light that is shining on her...

It seems Whispers more often than not (and i'm not going back to check so call me out if i'm wrong) uses the words to reference women on this site in the most derogatory fashion.

Very seldom actually....... small minded individuals like yourself want to characterize it as that to try to make yourselves look good but this particular thread is about a single female member..... My comments reference her and her alone...

Fine. If he so chooses, I don't mind..... *IF* he uses similar descriptors for himself and other gents on this site.

Oh well..... That's not going to happen....

[Staff edit. M]<== That is a point worthy issue and I would hope your local Mods take not of that..... One of things that will come soon is a much greater explanation of the rules and how they should be applied.... Not here to debate that. Originally Posted by Precious_b

One of the things that will happen when we get this started, as proven over time, is that staff will get to practice all their editing skills, issue warnings as well as issue points.....

I find it interesting being able to post a few words and illicit the kind of reactions that cause people to lose control of their emotions and cross lines......

Please be more careful Precious..... I am counting on you to help move conversations along and provide talking points that lead to much excitement..... getting pointed out early in the game and spending it in the penalty box will be no fun.....

Are you sure it's the 'challenge talk', that's causing the wetness, my dear, lilMynx, and not because I mentioned,
'wallets'?

Not that it much matters, because wetness is a beautiful thing. Always glad to be of assistance in that regard.

Wallet. Wallet. Wallet.

Heh!

Regards,
SofaKingFun-pathetic groveler with no game.

P_b, TFF! Thanks for the chuckle. "You had me at Challenge".Lmao!
.

.


Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

SofaKingHot-

Um, NO it wasn't the wallet talk because you had already mentioned minimal cash in your pockets!!! That's crazy talk.

I'm the first to admit that a Fat Wallet makes me wet...I've been known to orgasm just from rubbing an Amex Black Card across my nipples...awwwww, the feel of cold titanium against my warm flesh...

Going to take a cold shower now...

xoxo,
LMx

I'm sure the same could be said about you and your stripper "whores" w/re: wallet/spending time. We'll get back to that shortly.

So Whispers, you're totally fine with misinformation?

So long as it's a "John" discussing a "whore", his information is to be received as valid, irrefutable FACT and and as such, this misinformation is beyond reproach? Is that what you're suggesting?

That's pretty much the way I seeing it.

Taking that one step further, ..So if you inquire about scheduling an appointment, and you never hear back from her, and you then post a NCNS review on her, then this information is to be accepted, without question. Right?

If any guy challenges it, all of the sudden, the gal is placed on a pedistal and the challenge it, are her pathetic lapdogs

That's fucking ridiculous, not to mention HYPOCRITICAL...Think Trees and whom you were defending all the while failibg to get anyone to support your allegations.

How about you view the merits of the argument instead of the players involved?

*********************
Back to the wallet/time
I have no delusion that these gals are here for the money, nor that a lot of them would not be spending time with us otherwise. (Notice how I included myself by using the word, "us"?).

I think it's cute how you try to paint yourself as being "above all of this" and
"better than any of us", by using the term, "you" By doing so and excluding yourself, that's what's being implied; that you're above having to rely on your wallet and that gals just tend to gravitate towards you without you having to resort to lowlife tactics like we use; our $......that you dont have to..m

Then you go on to further condescend us by telling us we are pathetic grovelers with no game.

Alright, Whispers, let's go...

Since you've got such mad game I'm issuing a challenge.

Challenge:

You and me, armed with just our 'wit' and 'game',
(equal and minimal amounts of cash in our pockets),-all things equal.. go into an unfamiliar club, (one we've never been into, don't know the patrons/mgt/owners, etc)...
and see who pulls more pussy?

Let's just see who's got real fucking game and who has to rely (heavily) on their wallets and who doesn't?

Back-up that shit-talking.

Let's do it. Come on. You and me. We can even go two out of three, or three out of five, if that makes you more comfortable...It doesn't matter to me, so whatever.

As far as the winning prize is concerned...we can figure that out later, too,

My only stipulation is that the loser has to include
"Without My Wallet, I Have No Game. Money Is The Only Reason Women Talk To Me. I Am A Pathletic Loser",along with a link to the results, in their signature line, (in large, bold font) for the remainder of their existence on this board. Nothing else may be included nor changes made.
That's my only stipulation, the rest of this can be worked out pretty easily..

So what say? Are you willing to back-up your shit-talk and accept the challenge or are you going to wuss-out?

(If you decline, I think I'm ma start calling you Wuss-Puss, though....ijs.)

Anxiously awaiting your reply,
SofaKingFun

.

.






Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

You know what I am for SofaKing?

Letting the Ladies run their business any way they choose including letting them defend their positions.....

The ones that have value can speak for themselves or choose to remain silent....

I am very much against the way they turn men into sniveling little ass wipes looking to kiss up to them all the time.....

You think so highly of so many of these ladies but don't respect them enough as business people to allow them to deal with their business themselves.

In regards to your "challenge"..... Dude... I KNOW it's about the money..... That's why I don't waste time trying to kiss ass..... I've known for s long as I have been around here....

combine a little game with the money and we get better mileage...

Wanna compare the ladies in our personal lives? The ones that "love us", take care of our homes, raise our children?

I'll bet on having you beat in every category.

Why are you so bitter?

Am I pissing on your favorite whore?

It's early man.... We haven't even started... there is months of this shit coming soon!

I promise man... you are not going to have to follow me around to take your shots... we are going to do it right here in San Antonio CoEd over and over and over until you and others come to realize you can never win when dealing with people that simply do not give a fuck....

Just like precious...... you will be a pawn in the game we play..... used at whim... discarded when unneeded...

SofaKingHot, I forgot to ask...have you met WhispersInMyEar in person before? I have sound knowledge that he can be downright charming.

So be sure to bring you A game...

Carry on!

xoxo

Damn. Wish I could figure out how to do the quote of a quote in a reply.
*THAT* I will admit to being small minded about.

Oh, sorry about the statement that I got a warning about. Wasn't saying that myself to you. Just "speculating" what others would think. Or could think.

But you seem to have your freudian slip (that is not a speculation, only a literary remark, if it makes you feel better i'll phrase it "slip of a tongue") that could betray what you really feel/mean.
" I am addressing one particular women on this site"

I know you, on this thread, are referencing one Provider.
What you didn't comprehend is that you do this more often than not in refering to other Providers in general. As I said, you can call me out and prove me wrong in other post. But I made reference to this before. Why you got your panties in a wad over it now, I don't know.

I've read alot of your post in the past. This site and the previous. And my gut reaction was you definitely don't refer to women in the most positive light on this site. Charming as you probably are in real life though. But that is how you come across to me, and a few others that have openly stated that. Not the so called speculated on your part silent group.

One of the things that will happen when we get this started, as proven over time, is that staff will get to practice all their editing skills, issue warnings as well as issue points.....

I find it interesting being able to post a few words and illicit the kind of reactions that cause people to lose control of their emotions and cross lines......

Please be more careful Precious..... I am counting on you to help move conversations along and provide talking points that lead to much excitement..... getting pointed out early in the game and spending it in the penalty box will be no fun.....
Originally Posted by Whispers