and i love womens bodies. i woman who is very pretty and or has a great body reminds me of a work of art. while i have seen some cute tattoos on beautiful and no so beautiful women i would never paint over a Piccasso or Van Gogh. My view of tattoos could be characterized by 2 of the hottest women [in my opinion] on this board Sexy Sonya and Tara /Evans. Tara has tats and in no way would distract me while Sonya doesnt have any nor would i wish her to. While its a personal preference for the ladies by no means do i need this added attraction, but as long as its not overpowering or offensive it would not be a deal breaker. Originally Posted by petiteassmanAgree I've been trying to translate this for a while
According to a friend's brother (who has made it his career as an MD removing tats) around 10 to 15% of the US population has tats. That number increases to 25 to 30% in the 20 to 35 year old age group. He also stated that the regret rate is quite high, about 66% of people who get tats regret it with in the first five years of having one (down from 75% 10 years ago). Of course, he has made a good living off that buyer's remorse. I can't post a link to theses statistics, as they come from a conversation we had not too long ago (last month in fact).Well, Wisconsin is about 20 yrs behind the times, lol and I don't DO tattoos, I just HAVE them. So he's probably got a better handle than I do.
(Yes, I'm an engineer and stupid numbers will stick in my brain...) Originally Posted by DFK Hunter
Agree I've been trying to translate this for a while
Originally Posted by SP Hunter
I never knew that men who are fine with tats are in the minority. I would have said it's an even split.... It's a wonder I managed to survive in this business, I guess. It's never been an issue for me. Interesting research....I was not a fan of ink on women, until I saw Dannie. Somehow the band on her arm kinda fit her personality. Then I saw Vixen and gained an appreciation of tats as art, again the her extravagant ink seems to fit her personality. Reese McClain has an elegant ankle tat (that also serves to cover some scare tissue) that I love. So it seems I agree with THE DANNIE's comment.
I have a large one on my upper arm/shoulder that is easily covered by a short sleeve shirt. But, I am not attracted to women with lots of 'jail tats' or poorly done ink. Neck tattoos on women (typically a name from what I have seen) are not my favorite either. I guess for me, it's the location of the ink and the quality/subject matter. Originally Posted by Dannie
All I have to say about the subject is that I have tattoos and the best clients in the universe. Thanks guys for not judging me on my ink Originally Posted by reese fosterI'm not sure "judging" is the correct word. Yes, tattoos have some preconceptions associated with them in the broader culture, but I think in the hobby world, that is less true because so many girls have tattoos compared to the rest of the population. I think it's a matter of preference.
and as i have stated i would die to have that view in person just once in my life. would that tat deter me or change my way of thinking.. not in the least but when you have a tush that incredible id hate to cover it with clothes, tats, .. anything i would leave it EXACTLY the way it is. you know it is so perfect i almost would feel guilty cumming on it..well id get over the guilt pretty quick Originally Posted by petiteassmanWhy thank you Petiteassman, and SP. And I would love to really get to meet you anytime you leave Buffalo.
I think in the past people used to get tatoos to try to be different or out of the mainstream. Now, that no longer applies. Like its been said, lots of people have tatoos now. I think this days the opposite is true: most people that get tatoos is not because they want to be different but because they want to be the same.All my friends were non-conformists so I became a non-conformist, too!
It's human nature. Originally Posted by hardracer