What "brother"? How is the dad's girlfriend's son related to Trayvon Martin? Just another, lib-retard MSM distortion of the facts. Originally Posted by I B HankeringI meant Trayvon's "brother." You are correct. He is no relation to Trayvon.
I meant Trayvon's "brother." You are correct. He is no relation to Trayvon.No argument with you, just underscoring the deception and lies employed by the race baiters and the lib-retard MSM outlets.
But the larger issue is that the whole MSM was pitched the Trayvon story by a media specialist that the Martin family hired. That's why we only saw the pic of the 12 yo Tray. The various media outlets did very little vetting of the story and just ran with what the Martin family gave them. Originally Posted by gnadfly
All that crap will come out in the civil case, and probably in the Civil Rights case. Originally Posted by LexusLoverOne amazing thing about the verdict is the jury saw through all crap that the Prosecution laid out as "evidence".
...You mean the Joran Van Der Sloot plan?
He should take all of that money, properly pay his taxes, put the rest in Swiss bank accounts and move to Peru, which is where his family is from. Stay there as long as he can and try to become a Peruvian citizen. And keep a low profile for the rest of his life. Originally Posted by ExNYer
Seventeen year olds can enlist and serve in the U.S. military. They are called U.S. servicemen or women. And no one had any qualms killing Hitler's "boys" during WWII, because these "boys" were fully capable of inflicting death on others . . . and so it has been since the dawn of history.I once worked with a guy back in the 80's that was a hitler youth, they were rasied to follow Hilter like a demigod, they had kids much younger that 17 fighting, so I guess any age they can pull a trigger we may as well regard them as dangerous.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I once worked with a guy back in the 80's that was a hitler youth, they were rasied to follow Hilter like a demigod, they had kids much younger that 17 fighting, so I guess any age they can pull a trigger we may as well regard them as dangerous. Originally Posted by dreamvacationdatesPotentially. Age alone is not an indicator of innocence. Same holds true for Trayvon Martin. Check the ages of the "kids" pulling the triggers in Chicago. Some 6% to 15% of Chicago's murderers are 16 or younger. 60% of Chicago's murderers are aged 17 to 25.
No, you illiterate, inbred-hayseed. History is rife with examples of "boys" seventeen, and younger, who have been killers: including Hitler's "boys". William H. Bonney was 17 when he killed his first man. Martin's phone records evidence he too had a predilection for activities that were illegal and violent: Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Are you promoting your Nazi agenda, you shit-swallowing, swine?
Seventeen year olds can enlist and serve in the U.S. military. They are called U.S. servicemen or women. And no one had any qualms killing Hitler's "boys" during WWII, because these "boys" were fully capable of inflicting death on others . . . and so it has been since the dawn of history.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Right. Joran is in the slammer in Peru. He got away with murder in Aruba and went to Peru, murdered again but got caught. Don't be so sure about "a long time to come." Originally Posted by gnadflyYou think they will spring him in less than 20? He got sentenced to 28. I don't see them letting him out too much before the end of that time.