Do you percieve this as a threat by Slave Guinevere to out another Provider? Veiled or Direct?

I have personal knowledge of THE bomb about to be dropped. Don't say I didn't warn you. In the coming days there will be irrefutable proof of Slave's dirty games and tactics. Not that there isn't an orgy of circumstantial evidence already at your disposal, as well as BLACK and WHITE from the Queen herself. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

I hope the details come out before I'm done drafting my thread. I haven't been privy to any of the discussion in the back channels W may have had with any of you, so I'll just be presenting my perspective based on public forum messages.

Welcome, Inspector Beagle!!

I was going to say I have no dog in this fight but, apparently I do.

I thought the stripclub was drama lol.. children behave..

I was going to say I have no dog in this fight but, apparently I do. Originally Posted by Stanfeld

Would it be a Golden Retriever?

Would it be a Golden Retriever? Originally Posted by Whispers

Only dog still in this fight is a German Shepherd with goggles. SG could be convicted by a unbiased jury on any matter and this dog will continue with his circumventing "debates"

Speaks like a lawyer IMHO. A cheap no good one, like Saul Goodman.

Only dog still in this fight is a German Shepherd with goggles. SG could be convicted by a unbiased jury on any matter and this dog will continue with his circumventing "debates"

Speaks like a lawyer IMHO. A cheap no good one, like Saul Goodman. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

Simon Riley has the dog now!

How did I miss this... Oh, yeah, too many threads... This is an easy one... Plain reading of what was posted.

1. Shayla shouldn't have made the HIV comment
2. Slave shouldn't have mentioned "childcare issues", but said explicitly she wouldn't hurt another mommy
3. Whispers shouldn't have described the issue as a Child Custody issue. Childcare may have meant something other than custodial issues and now Whispers has given specificity to it. His mention of it apparently seems to give truth to (2) above, while (1) above is false.
4. The Player claims to have a video of he and a provider who won't see him anymore and mentions it in replies to her posts. That sounds more like blackmail or a threat to release the video than an explicit announcement by SG that she would NOT hurt another mother.

Oh, and #5, all of this bc a provider put the OP name in a signature?? Unsavory. Originally Posted by Netx9

Point of Order: The potty mouth whore wrote that she would "derive no pleasure" from the act........much as one says to a child before giving it a good ass wuppin.

Where is the funny dog with goggles? He must be out and about this morning driving with the breeze hitting him in his face? Doggie may be fetching SG her morning paper and slippers.

Speaks like a lawyer IMHO. A cheap no good one, like Saul Goodman. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

You're funny, dirk! It's called an education. You should try making an argument without insults and innuendo sometime. You seem so angry... Anywhoo, Still waiting on whatever bomb you said was going to drop.

@Paya - she doesn't wear slippers unless you ask her too. You'd know that if you had the chance to see her and didn't flip out when she wouldn't. Btw, I don't dog on you for your grammar. You're just incredibly incoherent at times. How was the SC last night? Any new stories to share?

@dear - yes, nice grammatical analysis of what she posted. You don't mention the fact that she publicly apologized and actually spoke to said provider and they're all good. Congrats on being the only one who at least discussed the merits and not just trash talk.

It's a beautiful day out so I'm going to go chase some cars (or maybe some ambulances @dirk). A lot more fun and educational than dealing with the likes of you guys.

Good to see you this morning puppy. The autospell on the phone messes me up sometimes. Busy here in my luxury box watching the Texans and a nice former dancer I bartending.

whats the over and under on the local games today? Don't chase the cars too hard and burn your paws. Oh on the slippers, I am so happy I have never had an appointment. Wrong time of year to scratch and break out.

My point of order was not in regard to her blatant threat to another provider.......it was in regard to your attempt to sugar coat it into something less..........apology not withstanding.

Aside from that 1 thru 4 appeared fairly well reasoned.

My point of order was not in regard to her blatant threat to another provider.......it was in regard to your attempt to sugar coat it into something less..........apology not withstanding. Originally Posted by dearhunter

he never gets it

Whispers the thread was funny but you see the results of the poll and its really clear. SG only has a loyal following from her few white knights who live on the Board mostly defending her. Its funny these guys never post reviews on new talent locally or traveling but just constantly post all day on this one middle aged SA based provider.

tsk tsk...