9mm v. .45

Don't be disingenuous, Speedy. A list with ascribed quotes has already been posted. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You obviously have a reading comprehension problem. I said who AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME has proposed banning all handguns? Not in 1988, not in 1993, not yesterday. Someone, anyone (Buehler, Buehler?) at the Executive, Legislative, or Judiicial level. Bet you can't name one.

And I could post up a list of the idiots you support who think all first grade teachers should tote Glocks as part of our educational programs....in order to protect 1st graders like those at Sandy Hook who were slaughtered because of the positions you support. You're a fucking dimwit, as usual. Originally Posted by timpage

By your comparison your asserting the above listed individuals @ http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1052479162&postcount=46 wishing to proscribe guns are "idiots": no argument there, Little Timmy.

You obviously have a reading comprehension problem. I said who AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME has proposed banning all handguns? Not in 1988, not in 1993, not yesterday. Someone, anyone (Buehler, Buehler?) at the Executive, Legislative, or Judiicial level. Bet you can't name one. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You have the comprehension problem, Speedy. Those individuals said what they said: they are on record. Their current posturing is fooling no one with an IQ higher than 60.

speedy, be careful. he'll call you cocky doody!

Rep. Louis Gutierrez wants to ban ALL junk handguns but is a little vague what a junk handgun is.
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?sec...cal&id=9015583

Jesse Jackson wants to ban almost every gun except double barrel shotguns, bolt action rifles, and revolvers and said so at a democratic gathering.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ide-your-guns/

The Violence Policy Center wants to ban all handguns.
http://www.vpc.org/studies/unsafe.htm

Another handgun ban organization.
http://www.banhandgunsnow.org/surveys/ban.html

How about those?

"And I could post up a list of the idiots you support who think all no one said all, those are your words first grade teachers no one has selected first grade teachers as a special group, your words again should tote Glocks who said anything about Glocks as part of our educational programs specify, educational programs for children or for future teachers....in order to protect 1st graders like those at Sandy Hook who were slaughtered they were slaughtered because of the "gun free zone" because of the positions you support. You're a fucking dimwit, as usual. "

How to lie like Timmy.

You have the comprehension problem, Speedy. Those individuals said what they said: they are on record. Their current posturing is fooling no one with an IQ higher than 60. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I will repeat, and I'll try to type veeeerrrrry slowly so even you can understand.

It does not matter what anyone said in the past. Their current positions on the subject are what matters. NO ONE on the national political scene is calling for a ban of all handguns. When Obama, Biden, Feinstein, et. al. come out TODAY and do so, then I'll believe you. Until then, it's just BS that you are spreading.

I once said I'd never vote for a Democrat for President. That was until the Republican party put up McCain/Palin as candidates. Times change. Conditions change. People's opinions change.

Rep. Louis Gutierrez wants to ban ALL junk handguns but is a little vague what a junk handgun is.
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?sec...cal&id=9015583

Jesse Jackson wants to ban almost every gun except double barrel shotguns, bolt action rifles, and revolvers and said so at a democratic gathering.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ide-your-guns/

The Violence Policy Center wants to ban all handguns.
http://www.vpc.org/studies/unsafe.htm

Another handgun ban organization.
http://www.banhandgunsnow.org/surveys/ban.html

How about those? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

None of these individuals (or groups) are in a political office that will vote on any law at the national level to affect handgun control. Gutierrez is there but what he wants to ban is very vague. Junk handguns? I doubt what you own would be considered a junk handgun, but let's wait until he returns to Washington and hear what he has to say. Again, NO ONE is advocating banning ALL handguns, as you so wrongly think is happening.

Quit doing the Obama and moving the goalposts. You wanted names and you got them. Then you wanted recent names and you got them. Now you want recent names of people in national office. What are are you going to next; an actual video confession of someone currently in the White House? I have news for you, Obama has been all around this and so has Holder as well as Rahm Emmanuel and Nancy Pelosi but they are smart enough, so far, to not have put themsleves on camera or audio. Their actions, their words, their inflections and off hand remarks tell the story to those of us who are listening.

The ex-pope came out for gun control of many kinds of weapons but you can now say that he is no longer in power. However, since this hasn't happened in 600 years who knows what power he has.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2510885.html

speedy, be careful. he'll call you cocky doody! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The turd-tongued golem, Assup the jackass -- the amalgation of anaimated piss and shit -- shows himself to be quite the selfish bastard who is jealously guarding his title as "Dipshit of the Year"!.

I will repeat, and I'll try to type veeeerrrrry slowly so even you can understand.

It does not matter what anyone said in the past. Their current positions on the subject are what matters. NO ONE on the national political scene is calling for a ban of all handguns. When Obama, Biden, Feinstein, et. al. come out TODAY and do so, then I'll believe you. Until then, it's just BS that you are spreading.

I once said I'd never vote for a Democrat for President. That was until the Republican party put up McCain/Palin as candidates. Times change. Conditions change. People's opinions change. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

It's you that's having the comprehension problem, Speedy. Those individuals said what they said: they are on record. If their current posturing is fooling you, then you have an IQ lower than 60.

Quit doing the Obama and moving the goalposts. You wanted names and you got them. Then you wanted recent names and you got them. Now you want recent names of people in national office. What are are you going to next; an actual video confession of someone currently in the White House? I have news for you, Obama has been all around this and so has Holder as well as Rahm Emmanuel and Nancy Pelosi but they are smart enough, so far, to not have put themsleves on camera or audio. Their actions, their words, their inflections and off hand remarks tell the story to those of us who are listening.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Again, you have a reading comprehension problem. I never said that there haven't been individuals who want guns completely gone. There are others who want to give individuals the right to have any weapon and carry it anyplace at anytime.

Way back in post #51 I made this statement:

When someone in power, in a National office, whether it be Executive, Legislative,or Judicial, comes forward and proposes legislation to ban all handguns, then I think you
have reason to get on your soapbox and bitch about it. So far -- NO ONE HAS DONE SO.

People like you and JD are so worried about laws being passed TODAY, not 25 years ago, that will affect your rights to own and carry guns. When Obama, Pelosi, or Holder come out and propose total gun bans, then you should start worrying about it. Until then, your thoughts are total BS.

It's you that's having the comprehension problem, Speedy. Those individuals said what they said: they are on record. If their current posturing is fooling you, then you have an IQ lower than 60. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Never said otherwise. I believe in people's actions rather than words, some of which go back to 1988. If you can't understand that, your IQ is impossible to register on any scale.

Never said otherwise. I believe in people's actions rather than words, some of which go back to 1988. If you can't understand that, your IQ is impossible to register on any scale. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

It's far and away higher than yours, Speedy, if you believe what those posturing SOBs are saying today over what they have said and have done in the past.

The gun grabber's agenda is to try and change popular opinion,
they are not stupid.

If they can whittle away public opinion about gun ownership, demonize
and vilify it, that is their goal, and an incremental plan of diminished
rights of firearm and firearm equipment ownership.

It is always the same "Problem Reaction Solution"

If they can ever gain an advantage in public opinion for their agenda,
that is what they are hoping for, the political advantage.

They know that the stupid sheeple public can be mind controlled
into accepting just about anything.

I didn't lie about you being a dimwit.

"And I could post up a list of the idiots you support who think all no one said all, those are your words first grade teachers no one has selected first grade teachers as a special group, your words again should tote Glocks who said anything about Glocks as part of our educational programs specify, educational programs for children or for future teachers....in order to protect 1st graders like those at Sandy Hook who were slaughtered they were slaughtered because of the "gun free zone" because of the positions you support. You're a fucking dimwit, as usual. "

How to lie like Timmy. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It's far and away higher than yours, Speedy, if you believe what those posturing SOBs are saying today over what they have said and have done in the past. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

We shall see. If anyone of the people mentioned by you and JD propose legislation on the national level within say, the next 6 months, to totally ban handguns,I will come to you, hat in hand, and say you were correct. On the other hand, I would expect the same from you and JD if nothing like that happens.