Going to take a chance and assume you can read. Reputable sources explain how they arrive at conclusions or results. They do. Everything is explained on the site. If you won't read how they come up with the results why would I waste my time telling you? You saw graphs and numbers and that was that. Too tough for you, huh? The graphs show how the numbers compare. Some people get more out of seeing a 7 foot line next to a 3 foot line (7ft is the lie line and 3ft is the truth).
The person makes a statement. Politifact investigates the claim/statement. Example: Trump says Obama had trump tower "wiretapped". No evidence of any kind supports that statement. If the info is found to be true later, they change the decision.
To make sure they aren't lying, you check multiple sources. If there is disagreement, find out why.
If you believe everybody lies then you believe exactly what someone who lies 70% of the time wants you to believe. That everyone lies as much as they do
Hahaha, oh that's epic. Suppose you explain how they arrived at those stats besides someone's opinion. Anyone can make a graph and put numbers on it. Since they all lie, assume they all lie equally until a method more precise is implemented.This is very precise. It's the method you just called for.And now you think everybody is at the starting point? Like as in all the things said and proven to be complete lies don't count?
Talking about falling for bullshit.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
These results came from.....all those statements. They have a record of every single one.
The under-educated base.
Make that the stupid base.
You had somebody tell you what to think. You sure didn't use any logic of any kind.
