why is there a baby food shortage?

Yet the GOP House members almost unanimously voted against the bill to provide relief for that shortage.

Why?

Because they want to make more babies then they can feed, house, clothe, educate, etc.

Fucking idiots.

If there’s a “baby food” shortage, someone’s gonna go hungry, eh?
Hahahahahahahahah!

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

CNN claims 7 WITH 3 Trillion for the China Syndrome. are you smarter than CNN professor poofter?


"almost 9 trillion" is off by "almost" 2 trillion. is yer math that fuzzy like your logic is? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

There are different ways to assign debt and deficits. I think the fairest way is the administration to actually made the budget. So 2017 was actually the budget Obama signed and 2021 was Trumps budget. But the following link is another way and is quite fair....it pegs Trump at 8.3.
Maybe our brilliant gay resident economist lustylad can weigh in....unless bambino has already broken the scale


https://www.thebalance.com/trump-pla...l-debt-4114401


Republican candidate Donald Trump promised during the 2016 presidential campaign that he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years.

Instead, his budget estimates showed that he would actually add at least $8.3 trillion

The GOP is so messed up. Controlled by religious zealots and Mr. Trump.



Plenty of video interviews from the past when Mr. Trump was pro choice. These days.......he keeps his mouth shut on issues, but finds every way possible to milk more money from his cult.

There are different ways to assign debt and deficits. I think the fairest way is the administration to actually made the budget. So 2017 was actually the budget Obama signed and 2021 was Trumps budget. But the following link is another way and is quite fair....it pegs Trump at 8.3.
Maybe our brilliant gay resident economist lustylad can weigh in....unless bambino has already broken the scale


https://www.thebalance.com/trump-pla...l-debt-4114401


Republican candidate Donald Trump promised during the 2016 presidential campaign that he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years.

Instead, his budget estimates showed that he would actually add at least $8.3 trillion Originally Posted by WTF

the article fails to state that 2.2 trillion is directly due to the China Syndrome via the CARES act which Trump called wasteful and he was right.



speaking of promises ...



Obama's Broken Deficit Promise

https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...eficit-promise


6 Times Obama Promised To Cut The Deficit

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...ut-the-deficit

the article fails to state that 2.2 trillion is directly due to the China Syndrome via the CARES act which Trump called wasteful and he was right.


speaking of promises ...



Obama's Broken Deficit Promise

https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...eficit-promise


6 Times Obama Promised To Cut The Deficit

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...ut-the-deficit Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Las promesas del candidato Obama a los latinos: ¿cumplió o decepcionó?


https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2...as_wbm_usa2012

La noche de la elección, en su discurso de victoria en Chicago, el presidente electo reiteró que haría la promulgación de una reforma migratoria "una de las principales prioridades de mi primer año como presidente".

Eso no pasó. Tampoco pasó en el segundo año de su mandato, cuando todavía contaba con mayoría demócrata en ambas cámaras del Congreso.

"Estábamos desconcertados, asustados por la forma como el presidente había respondido a la cantidad de promesas que dijo que iba a hacer para nuestra comunidad", comentó a BBC Mundo Gustavo Torres, director ejecutivo de Casa de Maryland, un centro de ayuda al inmigrante de ese estado aledaño a Washington DC.

"Lo que vimos a cambio fue un millón de inmigrantes deportados en tres años y medio, particularmente mexicanos, algo jamás visto en la historia" expresó con alarma Torres.

Varios analistas y partidarios del presidente consideran que su promesa fue sincera y que hizo un intento real para promover la legislación pero las condiciones en que recibió al país no le permitieron hacer mayores esfuerzos.

Just sayin'.

I take shots at EVERYBODY!

Las promesas del candidato Obama a los latinos: ¿cumplió o decepcionó?


https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2...as_wbm_usa2012





Just sayin'.

I take shots at EVERYBODY! Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

in English please ..

Las promesas del candidato Obama a los latinos: ¿cumplió o decepcionó?


Loosely translates to:


THE PROMISES OF CANDIDATE OBAMA TO THE LATINOS: ACCOMPLISHED OR DECEPTION?


https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2...as_wbm_usa2012













Just sayin'.

I take shots at EVERYBODY! Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Imigration reform failure. The article says he was handed a bag of shit to shine. Or convert to gold.



The last little bit of this scene was crucial as it was the funniest and most outrageous.

Imigration reform failure. The article says he was handed a bag of shit to shine. Or convert to gold. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Obama is a racist piece of shit. go shine his ass ..



bahahahhaaaaaa

Obama is a racist piece of shit. go shine his ass ..



bahahahhaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

And of course as a former Dixiecrat now KKK Grand Dragon Repubtard you can prove that

Then again, maybe we should also look at the treaty that Diaper Don forced on Canada and Mexico which made it very difficult to import baby formula from Canada to the benefit of the Cabal in the US

And of course as a former Dixiecrat now KKK Grand Dragon Repubtard you can prove that Originally Posted by chefnerd

prove he isn't.


Obama criticises Hispanic voters who picked Trump

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55081852


Santorum: Obama exacerbated racism

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...rbated-racism/


Obama: Ferguson police discrimination ‘oppressive and abusive’

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...ing-doj-report






https://theweek.com/articles/462236/...artin-protests


Did the Justice Department incite the 2012 Trayvon Martin protests?


The conservative group Judicial Watch says it has documents proving active involvement by a DOJ civil mediation unit

Investigate Racism in the Obama Justice Department

https://www.nationalreview.com/2010/...ew-c-mccarthy/


Racial animus is not the stuff of policy disagreement, it’s a constitutional travesty.


While commentators have sought to downplay the scandal over DOJ’s dismissal of the New Black Panther party voter-intimidation case, even the liberal media is becoming too embarrassed not to take notice of this injustice. That owes to last week’s explosive testimony by Christopher Coates, a decorated veteran lawyer and supervisor in DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Defying attorney general Eric Holder — and thus at great professional risk to himself — Coates testified before the Civil Rights Commission last week. It is now abundantly clear why Holder and his minions have been so keen on blocking Coates’s compliance with the commission’s lawful subpoenas.


In hair-raising testimony that named names, Coates described the Obama-Holder Justice Department’s policy of racially biased civil-rights enforcement. In so doing, he corroborated the prior account of his fellow whistleblower, J. Christian Adams, who resigned from the department in order to comply with a commission subpoena. (Holder’s subordinates stopped him from cooperating with the investigation while he was under their thumb.) Both Coates and Adams assert that they came forward because the Obama administration’s policy flagrantly violates civil-rights law and the Constitution. Both also said that public statements and testimony by high-ranking DOJ officials about the Panthers and DOJ policy case have been false.


The department dismissed the Panthers case despite the fact that the government had already won it, due to the defendants’ contemptuous default. The dismissal occurred despite the fact that career prosecutors judged the case to be exceedingly strong. Nevertheless, Holder’s top staffers have maintained for months that the rationale for the dismissal was a good-faith disagreement between low-ranking civil servants (i.e., career prosecutors) about the correct construction of the Voting Rights Act.


To the contrary, it is now clear from the testimony of Coates and Adams, as well as from documents DOJ was compelled to disclose in a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch, that Obama political appointees were heavily involved in ordering the dismissal and that they were being lobbied by left-wing activist groups. Indeed, Obama political appointee Steven Rosenbaum, the deputy assistant attorney general who is nominally responsible for the decision to dismiss the case, is said to have admitted to Coates that he never even read the case team’s memorandum about the legal and factual support for taking legal action against the Panthers.


A chain of communications finally pried from DOJ by Judicial Watch links Rosenbaum with even higher ranking political appointees. These include deputy associate attorney general Sam Hirsch (a former Obama campaign operative who has pushed for the race-based Balkanization of Hawaii); Thomas Perrelli, the associate attorney general (DOJ’s No. 3 official); and David Ogden, who was deputy attorney general (the No. 2 post at Justice) when the front office, contrary to its repeated claims, was deliberating over the Panthers case. Also almost certainly in the loop is Holder himself. Besides the fact that the Panthers controversy inside his department was something he’d naturally have been interested in and briefed on, the Judicial Watch disclosures indicate that talking points about the Panthers dismissal were prepared for the attorney general at some unspecified point.

You prove he is. Burden of proof lies with the affirmative, numbnuts.

You prove he is. Burden of proof lies with the affirmative, numbnuts. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

i just did. you can read .. can't ya? i even put in links to the source.


how many times have you posted Trump is a racist. prove it.

The GOP is so messed up. Originally Posted by VitaMan

And yet pick a poll, any poll and you will find that a generic Republican has a double digit advantage on most generic Democrats.


Pick a poll, any poll and you will find Independents at less than 30% approval of Biden and same for Hispanics. I predict more blacks will vote Republican in the mid-terms than ever before.


But yeah, the GOP is so messed up. Fortunately though, this time around, not as fucked up as Democrats.


I also predict that Biden will be lucky to break 30% approval by Nov.


Dead babies on your watch, I have a feeling isn't going to play well with Moms, the ones that voted for Biden and now regret it.