It was 'LUST' not 'Love' in my honest opinion (IMHO)...cool .
Originally Posted by HedonisticFool
It was definately alot of both. Ofcourse everyone is entitled to their opinions. I was actually shocked to find this discussion. I figured the fact of becoming emotionally involved with a provider or client was taboo. I personally would have never shared my story with fear of ridicule. Glad to know I'm not the only fool.
Press on people...spare no details.
[/quote]
Falling in love with a provider and vice versa doesn't make one a fool...you can't help what happens emotionally between two people. It takes a lot of work and effort and communication to date someone in this profession. I married a client, dated others, and it didn't work out primarily because of the jealousy issue or that I'd come home to my man and be too tired to dress up again in lingerie and have sex. I think I definitely dated and married a client(s) because I could never lie to a civvie man about my job, I just am not a good liar and would feel terrible deceiving him. And MOST men ( civvie) would be horrified or totally turned off if I said " Well yes I'm an escort..." So to me,while some providers would balk at the thought of dating a client, it made sense because of how we met: he knew what I did, and I knew he was a hobbyist. I didn't expect the guy to stop hobbying either just because he was dating me. But they ultimately always ended up throwing it in my face about 'work'. So, for five years, I've been single, and right now, I'll say honestly I don't think I could have a relationship with a man as long as I work. Emotionally, spiritually...it's too taxing. Plus I have another job too, and when I get home from work ( both jobs) the last thing I need is to see someone at home. I want to be alone and with my cat and have serious solitude and downtime to myself.