Ok Ladies... Reviews

I'm not questioning ECCIE's policies at all Devin.... I just wanted to get the provider's POV. That's all. This has turned out to be a pretty good thread.....

I DIG, I JUST THINK WE THE CLIENTS, SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE HONEST, AND WE CAN ALWAYS PUT YMMV FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PROVIDER.

DEVIN

GOOD POST INQUISITION TO EA

Perfect example is J#'s review.... He had a bad time and he is reputable, wrote an honest review. According to other "reputable" guys they had a great time and will see her again. So will I BTW.

It's all YMMV to a degree anyway. Reviews are only good to a point. Reviews should be honest, I agree, however they should more less be for B&S, upsells, misleading/fake pics, or a complete drop in service across the board (not just 1 or 2 guys).

Another perfect example is your review of Kimberly. You speak highly of her but according to several reviews she is not recommended (I will be seeing her as well when I get the chance if my budget will get out of the way lol).

POINT WELL TAKEN, AND WITH KIMBERLY, SHE IS VERY YMMV AND THAT'S WHAT THAT WAS THE FIRST THING I WROTE UP AT THE TOP, SO YOU MAY WANT TO THINK THROUGH BEFORE PULLING THE TRIGGER, UNLESS, YOU HAVE THE CHEDDAR TO BURN, BECAUSE NUMBER ONE SHE IS VERY YOUNG AND PICKY AS WELL. SHE IS VERY BI-SEXUAL AND BECAUSE ALL 3 SESSIONS WITH HER WERE 3 SOMES, IT REALLY PULLED OUT THE ANIMAL IN HER, BUT I KNOW YOU EA AND WOULD NOT WANT YOU TO BE SET UP FOR A BAD SESSION AT MY RECOMMENDATION, BECAUSE OF HER STRICT YMMV PROTOCOL.

JUST TRYING TO LOOK OUT FOR YOU.

DEVIN

Appreciate the advice and even if it turned out to be a so so time then I would be fine since I made the choice to go through with it

first off they can see the reviews except for the ros and they pretty much know what happened there because they were with you..
so we can review them but you cant take criticism from them ?
why not and if you are honest about the session good or bad they can respond but thats why i said leave it simple with yes or no answers not a pissing contest for people to get on here and argue about he said she said.
you might see a provider you dont click with and give her a bad review ..well in return she may not of liked the way you acted for that reason she should be able to say the same about you.
all im saying it is fair that way and it might surprise you what info we clients can get from it.
Ive talked to several providers that saw clients that they didnt click with and probably would never see again so whats the worse that could happen ?
they tell you that you suck and they wouldnt recomend you.
everybody is entitled to their own oppinion and their own view point so if you cant take the heat dont play in the kitchen.
im pretty sure that most of the providers in a certain area know the other providers and word spreads if your a jackass so why not have it where all can see what a jackass you are if you treat someone wrong.
i know it doesnt bother me for them to review me. Originally Posted by wildwooly1

everybody is entitled to their own oppinion and their own view point so if you cant take the heat dont play in the kitchen.

The main difference is we pay all the utensils in the kitchen. If a provider gives you a bad session you still pay for it. If it was free then by all means write away. If I'm going to spend hundreds of dollars on a provider I don't want any drama associated with it also. When I hobbied I wrote true accurate reviews that were 95% positive. I also wrote true accurate reviews that were negative. If you think your going to get something positive from a provider after you gave them a bad review your in a dream world.

I know several providers who have in fact offered "make up" dates because of a bad review.

They felt it was their fault the guy had a bad experience, and offered a free date to make up for it.

You see this time and again when agency providers turn indy. When they were making only half the rate working for the agency, they lacked in service and got some bad reviews because they were literally exhausted trying to please a boss. A year later when they turn indy, they want to show those guys how much better they are when their volume decreased and all the money goes to them.

Fellas.... I have a new question but don't want to start another thread. No need to give Wakeup any reason to post another "# threads # days" thread lol..... That or someone else can start a new thread asking these questions...

Just what constitutes an "honest" review?
: Are negative reviews the only ones considered honest?
: Or ones that contain at least some negative aspects to it?
: Are ones with all positives pretty much considered BS?

I think an honest review goes a little deeper then just the seccion itself. An honest review can be sometimes really vague or very detailed. Most of the negative reviews that I've read usually have some agenda behind them to express how much a bad time that person had or didn't have. I've seen some all postive reviews. Yes some have an eliment of bs and some don't. I think that it is in the eye of the beholder weather that person see's a review as honest or not.

I would think "honest" means in all aspects. Too many times a guy who had a problem with a provider in ONE area, makes it as if every part of her was also bad.

For example: If she is a perfect 10 in looks but lacks bcd..say that. Don't say she is a porn star just because of some eye batting that had you silly. Same goes for the reverse...if she was a dog but rocked your world, at least give her the credit for being good in the sack.

So you are saying that if there are things are less desirable physically but she was great bcd then there is nothing wrong with mentioning those issues in the review along with giving her credit for the good parts as well?

Do you think providers can be objective emporium not hold that against the reviewer if he still wanted to see her?

Do you think providers can be objective emporium not hold that against the reviewer if he still wanted to see her? Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

From personal experience...Yes!

So you are saying that if there are things are less desirable physically but she was great bcd then there is nothing wrong with mentioning those issues in the review along with giving her credit for the good parts as well?

Do you think providers can be objective emporium not hold that against the reviewer if he still wanted to see her? Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

I do think you should mention it and NOT worry about what she thinks. I mean ok, she can't help it if you're not attracted to her because beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but if she did not take some time to pretty up that IS her fault. There are ways of being honest without being a d3ck baby...you know that.

Clearly if you STILL want to see her again after writing that review, she can't be all that bad.

I think it depends on the girl. Some can take criticism some can't. I still think that physical looks depends on the person. We all have different likes and dislikes on what we find attractive. The same can be said about service. One bad review doesn't tell a whole story now if a girl gets serveral bad reviews from different people then there is a problem.