Post your favorite Slave G pics...fan or hater I'm certain everyone has some!!!

a10, the weak linck in your position is found in the detailed description of SG's medical situation by SG herself.

There is a universal rule at play. You post it/you own it

SG opened the door and let all of the golden retrievers out of the dog kennel with her own comments.

Her true friends (if she had any) were screaming at her to shut up and hide under a rock with rockerrick on a leash.

Favorite photos, avatars and free SG threADs will not make it go away. They only keep the conversation on the front page where Whispers wants it.

When she gets back, her only comment on the whole matter should be the following "I apologize for my behavior that led to my recent banning. I apologize for being indiscrete with a hobbyists information, and it will not happen again."

When it comes up in future threADs (and it will), she should simply reply with "once again, I apologize for that".

She should not attempt to justify her actions. She should not attempt to explain how the whole thing started as something else...........and if you are her friend, you will stay out of it.

It's not about trying to curtail that as charitable donations are honorable things to do. The problem has been and continues to be where Whispers continues to claim/speculate that SG has a disease that could cause harm to members of this community without any proof whatsoever rule #16 of the ECCIE guidelines states and I quote:

#16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member.

Now since Whispers has no direct knowledge of her condition other than what she has posted here it is therefore speculating about it which is not and should not be allowed.

The second problem I have is: that there is no where in any thread that SG has asked for his opinion or anyone else's for that matter about her condition so again Whispers should not be allowed to continue to mention it in any public or private forum including pm's and no I am not divulging any private info other than what was posted in the following thread:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1007848

I am not sure how to quote single posts but I am referring to post 13 and 17 where it looks like Whispers is sending people info on what he believes is slave's condition. He also at one time had his sig line also speculating on the same issues which to me is slanderous since he has no real knowledge of her situation. But let's say he did have actual info on her condition he is still in violation of rule #16 as it states and again I quote "but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member."

Slave has never asked for his opinion in any public thread on this board. Has she posted what her condition is yes but that gives no right for me you or any other member the right to start questioning her on what she has or doesn't have

Now I don't know why the mods or the higher ups have allowed whispers and others to continue to bring up this subject but I personally don't think it is right and it should be stopped. And until that happens I as well as other will continue to support her.

You can call me a WK, a Lemming, or even a pimp. And just for the record she never asked for my help and I never asked her if she would like my help. I would have done the same for any other lady with the same situation that is how I am I believe in standing up for people who are being mistreated and cannot defend themselves. Which she currently cannot do because of the ban. Originally Posted by a10bomb

I changed my signature line and have given this the opportunity to die down /die off. Howver. For as long as you and Louigi and a few others see fit to run ads for a banned member her in CoEd. I will respond with "the rest of the story". I will also respond to and answer all the emails generated and PMs initiated as a result of these conversations. My replies there and here are with quotes of HER posts.... HER words.....followed by my opinion as to why they concern me and should concern others,


If you guys shut up and let her live out her ban.... you would probably find I have no time or interest in the old whore..... There are some young sexy ones that deserve attention......

My replies there and here are with quotes of HER posts.... HER words.....followed by my opinion as to why they concern me and should concern others, Originally Posted by Whispers

Which is the reason why you are in violation of guideline #16 because you are giving your opinion when no question was asked by SG and you should not be allowed to continue to send those pm's or mention anything about her condition

#16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member.

She posted this as well

I am ALWAYS OPEN to discuss the nature of my medical challenges with anyone who has any questions or concerns. Originally Posted by Slave Guinevere

But ducked all the hard questions.....


No Sir..... As shocking as it is SHE put all this on the table and made it an issue,,,,,

Didn't any of you go "Huh" when it appeared in a thread that had NOTHING to do with any issue of medical nature she blurted it all out?

... But ducked all the hard questions ... Originally Posted by Whispers

What hard questions?

I've not commented on this, but have followed it and it's all pretty dumb from all sides... it's just drama being played out where all we should be worried about it, depending on your side of the hobby, is making money or having a good time. You can get drama at home with your wife, gf, kids, in-laws, etc...

It doesn't matter if she is banned from here or not, if you want to see her you still can, a ban from this site is not an end all be all.

It feels an awful lot like JR High in here...

The only plus out of all of this has been all of the hot pics of her being posted, other than that, no one has gained anything.

... If you guys shut up and let her live out her ban ... you would probably find I have no time or interest in the old whore ... Originally Posted by Whispers

To this impartial observer, it would seem you already tire of the fight. I think Louigi, Net, et al have succeeded in wearing you down.

(Bill Parcells once said, I paraphrase, When you first start thinking of retiring, you already have.)

Which is the reason why you are in violation of guideline #16 because you are giving your opinion when no question was asked by SG and you should not be allowed to continue to send those pm's or mention anything about her condition

#16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member. Originally Posted by a10bomb

If she spews the info. out, it is fair game for most instances. That has been proven over and over again. And its not just like she made a one time remark about health issues. Every week it was something new. Come on man, really??

To this impartial observer, it would seem you already tire of the fight. I think Louigi, Net, et al have succeeded in wearing you down.

(Bill Parcells once said, I paraphrase, When you first start thinking of retiring, you already have.) Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

I have seen the opposite, but not regarding to Whispers. The three stooges as I call them, have got really quiet after some VERY VALID points made by myself and others. It is tough to argue the truth, or things archived in this forum.

Slave G. made this very black and white. I am assuming it just gets to a point where Whispers as well has made so many great arguments against them, it gets to a point where it is recognized certain people will refuse to see the truth, and I am sure Whispers is relishing in the fact that they look so damn ignorant to the majority. I know I am, and am not scared to proclaim that. You can only beat a dead dog so much right?

When people get to the point of managing a girl or pimping a girl, we have seen what kind of backlash that can cause. I think in their quest to redeem Slave G, they hurt her even more. Tough lessons to learn here Slave. Hopefully you are taking notes and filing this away for your return. Your best bet as it has already been said is to come back humble, apologetic, and go on with your business.

.... The three stooges as I call them, have got really quiet ... Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

This is an interesting observation that may, or may not, be factual. What I am certain is factual is that YOUR posting history in these (SG related) threads has INCREASED EXPONENTIALLY since the Slave went on vacation. Maybe one of "the stooges," or someone else, could do the research and provide the actual numbers.

I expect your new found voice will go quiet soon enough. Bans aren't forever.

I have seen the opposite, but not regarding to Whispers. The three stooges as I call them, have got really quiet after some VERY VALID points made by myself and others. It is tough to argue the truth, or things archived in this forum. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

Trust me it has nothing to do with your misinformed poorly worded posts DDSA so dont flatter yourself. I have been working the last couple of days and have not had as much time to post as I did earlier in the week. But dont worry I will pop in when I can.

I have seen the opposite, but not regarding to Whispers. The three stooges as I call them, have got really quiet after some VERY VALID points made by myself and others. It is tough to argue the truth, or things archived in this forum.

Slave G. made this very black and white. I am assuming it just gets to a point where Whispers as well has made so many great arguments against them, it gets to a point where it is recognized certain people will refuse to see the truth, and I am sure Whispers is relishing in the fact that they look so damn ignorant to the majority. I know I am, and am not scared to proclaim that. You can only beat a dead dog so much right?

When people get to the point of managing a girl or pimping a girl, we have seen what kind of backlash that can cause. I think in their quest to redeem Slave G, they hurt her even more. Tough lessons to learn here Slave. Hopefully you are taking notes and filing this away for your return. Your best bet as it has already been said is to come back humble, apologetic, and go on with your business. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

You really made a valid point with this post! Maybe you haven't seen the responses it drew!

You really made a valid point with this post! Maybe you haven't seen the responses it drew! Originally Posted by Louigi

You can count right Louigi? You do have reasoning skills to figure out that more than one category supported her ban in some way, right? You can do basic arithmetic right? Surely all those years hunting coins in Super Mario Bros. you learned how to count.

If you are on a Windows platform there is this thing called "calculator" sure there is something similar for Apple platform. Pull it up. Add the categories that have something to do with banning, NOT banning Slave. Then get back at me with your results. Sure things may have changed a little since my post, but it clearly shows, the majority DO NOT GIVE A SHIT about her ban, and in fact support it.

Trust me it has nothing to do with your misinformed poorly worded posts DDSA so dont flatter yourself. I have been working the last couple of days and have not had as much time to post as I did earlier in the week. But dont worry I will pop in when I can. Originally Posted by a10bomb

misinformed and poorly worded?

Come on you can do better than that. Is someone above your intelligence level a10bomb? Is that even allowed?? Say it ain't so. I am certainly not misinformed, as we all are informed from the same sources of information. The information that is posted here on this site. Poorly worded? To each their own, but I am sorry if my big words and proper grammar for the most part, intimidate you to say my writings are poorly worded. If they are poorly worded because they do not SUCK Slave G's shit hole, then I will have to agree with you on that one.