Support Slave G with an AVATAR up grade!

EDIT: And while I'm at it....thought everyone should know some little Lou kid sent a Beagle dog a PatheticMessage 12 hrs ago asking the Beagle to suck on a lollipop, in response to some canine post summarizing some Slave fiasco. It'll play lil Lou's game and stoop to Lou's level since there's no point trying to hold a civil discussion with Lou. Just how many points would mods award the little Lou kid if said canine were to go ahead with a complaint? Originally Posted by Beagle

Wait did you just reveal info about a private message??? It thought that was against the rules as well???

Wait did you just reveal info on a private message??? It thought that was against the rules as well??? Originally Posted by a10bomb

I was just relating a story I heard about some dog and a kid. It's Pathetic Message, for the record....do not get confused.

Staff Edit JJ

Here's a picture to illustrate my story. Wait, did I say Pathetic Message? I meant Pathetic Massage

Posting such pictures is inappropriate.

Schnap! Which guideline is that?

Alright, last post before I head out. Be back in a few days. Keep the drama alive till I get back......

#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.

#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

This guideline has been a bit misused.....

Exacty what part of it does the picture posted violate?

#10 - Topics regarding children, No... The topic is not about children or Louigi

and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board.

You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, He probably is

and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. the current subject matter conforms

Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges. None of that here....

Which leaves us with "certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board"

It cays "certain images" not ALL images. It leaves some room for interpretation. Is the poster in any way using this particular image in a manner that would be in the spirit of the guideline?

My opinion is that it is not.

You obviously think otherwise.

I think the word "certain" is in the guideline to allow for some common sense. to be applied.

This guideline has been a bit misused.....

Exacty what part of it does the picture posted violate?

#10 - Topics regarding children, No... The topic is not about children or Louigi

and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board.

You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, He probably is

and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. the current subject matter conforms

Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges. None of that here....

Which leaves us with "certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board"

It cays "certain images" not ALL images. It leaves some room for interpretation. Is the poster in any way using this particular image in a manner that would be in the spirit of the guideline?

My opinion is that it is not.

You obviously think otherwise.

I think the word "certain" is in the guideline to allow for some common sense. to be applied. Originally Posted by Whispers

And I am the one who is confused???

Beagle goes from revealing info that was sent to him in a PM and then tries to cover it up or shall I say deflect it with some BS story about a story he heard about a kid and a dog??


Give me a freaking break!!!

But what do I know I am just a lemming right Whispers???

Nice Try on changing the subject though definitely have to give you an "E" for effort!!

And I am the one who is confused???

Beagle goes from revealing info that was sent to him in a PM and then tries to cover it up or shall I say deflect it with some BS story about a story he heard about a kid and a dog??


Give me a freaking break!!!

But what do I know I am just a lemming right Whispers???

Nice Try on changing the subject though definitely have to give you an "E" for effort!! Originally Posted by a10bomb

People comment on the existence of PMs and the subject all the time. Generally, that is not seen as the same as posting the message itself.

Actually the limited times I've seen action taken for merely posting information from a PM is when it was an outing concern.

Correct me if I'm wrong...

This guideline has been a bit misused.....

Exacty what part of it does the picture posted violate?

#10 - Topics regarding children, No... The topic is not about children or Louigi

and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board.

You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, He probably is

and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. the current subject matter conforms

Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges. None of that here....

Which leaves us with "certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board"

It cays "certain images" not ALL images. It leaves some room for interpretation. Is the poster in any way using this particular image in a manner that would be in the spirit of the guideline?

My opinion is that it is not.

You obviously think otherwise.

I think the word "certain" is in the guideline to allow for some common sense. to be applied. Originally Posted by Whispers

You've actually hit on one of my pet peeves...people will freak out about some photo of a kid and a dog, but see nothing wrong about posting about topics regarding their kids...if the rule is no children...make it NO children!

NC/NS (hobbyist or provider) because they couldn't get a babysitter...need to book more appointments because their kids need stuff...off with kids for spring break...dropped kid off at daycare early to meet a provider...left kids with another provider who screwed them over...calling CPS on another board member because of a feud...

It leaves a bad taste in my mouth...


To get back on topic...thank you to SofaKingDoMeAlready for his support...

Another fucktard weighs in! But his ignorance is evident to those who have followed the stalking these last few weeks! Beagle - best to retire while you're ahead! Originally Posted by Louigi

Clearly I'm a lover of all kinds...I try to love you, I really do...but for the Love of God...your reading comprehension, grasp on reality, and memory skills are somewhat lacking at times.

Honestly, I think you're a sweet guy, but sometimes we all need to step back and look at facts. I'm a fact girl...I try not to let my emotions get in the way, regardless of my passionate nature.

Honey, baby, sweety. Just try to be a little objective...

People comment on the existence of PMs and the subject all the time. Generally, that is not seen as the same as posting the message itself.

Correct me if I'm wrong... Originally Posted by LilMynx69

EDIT: And while I'm at it....thought everyone should know some little Lou kid sent a Beagle dog a PatheticMessage 12 hrs ago asking the Beagle to suck on a lollipop, in response to some canine post summarizing some Slave fiasco. Originally Posted by Beagle

Maybe it was not word for word but the message seems pretty clear on what was sent.

But that is OK because ya'll are doing what lawyers do the old "razzle dazzle them"




IJS

Or is more like this??

Maybe it was not word for word but the message seems pretty clear on what was sent.

But that is OK because ya'll are doing what lawyers do the old "razzle dazzle them"




IJS Originally Posted by a10bomb

Razzle Dazzle.

I'll take that as a compliment.

Thanks for noticing.

If I was paranoid...I'd think you were trying to out me...


But I'm not.

Humming...
{{{{My Kind of Town....Chi Ca Go is Myyyyy kind of Town....}}}

Razzle Dazzle.

I'll take that as a compliment.

Thanks for noticing.

If I was paranoid...I'd think you were trying to out me...


But I'm not.

Humming...
{{{{My Kind of Town....Chi Ca Go is Myyyyy kind of Town....}}} Originally Posted by LilMynx69

You just can't hijack an SL thread. LOL Does anyone remember what the thread is about?

You just can't hijack an SL thread. LOL Does anyone remember what the thread is about?
Originally Posted by Still Looking

I do and I really like my new avatar great idea SL

Just in case anybody can't read it here it is again