I've noticed a lot of men (including myself) having problems in their reviews trying to give a good impression of the provider's body type, sometime in an unflattering way. I was intrigued when I stumbled across the attached visual scale. I thought it was tastefully done, and wondered what other people thought of it.Dude, your definition of "thick" is definitely different than mine. #6 seems athletic, but the only thing that may be considered thick on her is her thighs. If anyone else thinks #8 is thick, and #9 is super thick, please tell me where and why. Normally, voluptuous includes an ample breast size. While #13 is a lovely MILF, I don't see thick voluptuous, although she's definitely got child-bearing hips I have no problem with! Whomever did this forgot rubenesque, which may be #19.
I'm sure there's one out there somewhere for male body types that the ladies could use for us as well. Originally Posted by Bugei
Hey poppy.......Roflmao at least she aims high...if she tries to upsell just leave the extra on top of the tv and see if she can get it
But ya know.....one of her reviews from a few months back indicates she's an "UP"-Seller....
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1011365
She can upsell me any day..... Originally Posted by Russ38
Fancy. Im the same size as #2 and im nowhere near anorexic. Thats not only body shaming but an insult. Anorexia is a disease. Period. Im proud of my body size and by having two kids almost 40 and a flat tummy with no stretch marks or flab. I find your comment extremely distasteful. No shade though just my opinion. Originally Posted by KammyeI apologize, Kammye. I've seen you in person and I don't think you look like #2. You're slender but healthy, and are, without doubt, a beautiful lady. The girls in pic 1 and 2 don't look very sturdy or vigorous to me (my grammy would be shoving potato soup and soda bread at both of them), but these are one-dimensional images, so you don't get a true comparison.
...but I think it telling that we get more upset over the label "anorexic" than we do "obese," which is also a medical condition. I also don't see anyone on here calling skinny girls "sticks," but the term "whale" is bandied about like a volleyball on a beach full of spring breakers, hard, fast, and frequent. Double standard. Originally Posted by FancyinheelsIt's not a double standard...it's a standard...
It's not a double standard...it's a standard...That doesn't make it right, Wakeup. Are we lemmings? If one or a few do it, then the whole herd jumps off the cliff because that is the "standard" for lemmings?
What does it say to you, about standards of beauty here, when fat chicks are picked on more than skinny chicks? You're not new at this game...why does it have to be explained to you again? Originally Posted by Wakeup
Save the Krill! I'd like to order a #4 with a lemonade please.Now that would tick me off as a guy. Providers should be HONEST about who they are, what body type they have, how long they have trod the planet... It only backfires otherwise.
We have been debating this same set of pics in Pittsburgh and have come to the conclusion that all girls in Pittsburgh who are between 1-18 are all advertising as spinners, 19-21 are advertising mostly as words used to describe 1-18 Originally Posted by amishgangster