Actually, I don't think that perfection is really the issue - it is what are you willing to pay for a particular provider, what are you willing to pay overall, and how do you express that price point?
We are not exactly selling cookies here
so I fail to see how any other "business model" fits. It is a very unique industry in which the client wants perfection, however defined, and can NEVER create that themselves--"Weird Science" was just a movie, kids... Originally Posted by PhillyChik
In general, I have my upper limits which I am willing to reach only sparingly (and were I near PhillyChik, it would be a real temptation), with a general price window that is lower. Typically the question is what is the real value? Many times I see someone's profile that sparks interest, but I won't contact them because they are out of the price window I have set for that day, though I do keep a mental file of those in within the max window. I think that there is no question that the general etiquette of this business is not to ask for discounts if none are advertised (though I think that asking if there is a hhr rate when none is posted is OK unless the ad states otherwise).
Sometimes I have put a post in ISOs or contacted a provider who did not have a rate posted. If the rate is not in my window, I reply "Thanks, but no thanks." On occasion, the reply has been "What are you willing to spend?" If they open the door I am willing to bargain and ask for a discount, unless the initial requested rate is so high that to counter within my window would be perceived as insulting. In those cases, a carefully worded reply designed to avoid insult is best. On one occasion a provider responding to an ISO got very pissed off at my "Thanks, but no thanks" since she thought that she was a great value for the rate. To some, maybe, but not to me at the time.
Given that this is a very "personal" business, not like...buying apples, I think it is best to tread carefully and treat providers with kindness and respect, especially if you feel that the self-image as expressed by a rate is not warranted.