sugar baby/sugar daddy

And yes, 99% of my non review posts are done in PURE sarcasm mode sans italics but that takes an intellect to understand - Originally Posted by Kuhlarrow

Dude, I'm in my PURE sarcasm mode when I break your balls about the stupid shit you post. Use your intellect.

Like this SARCASM you posted in Dallas. They LOVED your PURE sarcasm mode. (I think only poster #2 got the PURE sarcasm THEME). Enjoy everyone:

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=46...ight=kuhlarrow


..

Inspector I walk quietly but cArry a big stick. Nice try in antagonizing but I'm the Stage builder, not the Thespian Troupe d'Connards that Dallas Troupe is indeed one of my CLASSIC stages I set - that was FUN!!!! And the number of Dallas honeys I see regularly just goes to show Ya...

Besides, I got my entertainment already from the context dissection diatribes of the feeble minded Thespians that adorned my stage. Plus arguing with idiots is exhausting... So I'm saving my strength for my usual ATF's UTR's y SB's...in fact on the way ahorita to see my sparkly 19 year old SB at her apartment, it's almost rent day Ya see.

Jusqua demain Inspector Clueless...

I almost got in an accident on 410 near Bandera this morning. Some Nazi cut me off going 88mph..... probably trying to go Back to the Fuhrer

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Inspector I walk quietly but cArry a big stick. Originally Posted by Kuhlarrow

It is much more likely that the reality is as Miss Guinevere suggested: you make a lot of noise because you "pack" a little stick.

Maybe we should call you kool dart instead of kool arrow?

Wow Mayor!! Close call!!! Was it Nico LaHood???? Was his brother Tony Parker with Him????? I heard County Judge Nelson Wolfe had called for a mandatory meeting today.

Glad you're ok!

Now back to MPK's inquiry on SB/SD...as I was saying...LOL

LOVE MY SB's....I mean love to LUST my SB's...oops.

Inspector!?! Cock size attacks? Really? Too funny how you show your true intellectual level! Too funny.

So back to the SB/SD intent please, poor MPK wants insight & input.

So; AS I WAS SAYING...LOL...LOVE my SB's. It's a good thing as long as both know it's a mutual con game where in BOTH sides are trying to get the most from each - one side quiere dinero the other side quiere panocha! So, ahi esta! C'est tout! Fin!

Mutual con game
Nice description.

I have never done the SD/SB thing. Read up on it early when they put that section of the site.

But there are different levels of the relationship. Not just one straight forward package.

Ideally, it is a relationship that, when completed, both parties separate in a better place in life than when it began.

Even though i've been *accused* of being a SD, I can't do it at this point in my life because it does involve a commitment on the SD part also. And I am not talking about a fiscal angle.

But if either party goes into it with a "con game" mentality, to me, it truly isn't a SD/SB relationship. But I guess i'm just an idealist.

PB no, not an idealist - a ROMANTIC! Wow man, you moved me...sniff sniff...I love you Man! Lol

I say con game in the sense that rarely does the SB/SD end in marriage, etc. Not to SAY it NEVER has, (geez, gotta caveat it before the Absolutes attack) but how healthy can a relationship be when it began purely based on materialistic attraction??? So that's why I say "con game". It's FUN and both sides get what they want so it's really just Business, Guido. Someone tell Sonny to get the car, I'm gonna get some fruit...

... It's a good thing as long as both know it's a mutual con game where in BOTH sides are trying to get the most from each ... Originally Posted by Kuhlarrow

You define an adversarial relationship. Which apparently suits you.

But I don't see that a "good thing" for me.

A Romantic?!

Why is it always the dudes saying that about me?

Falling in love is NOT the objective of the SD/SB relationship.
Or the Hobby relationship either.

But one can't control the heart. BUT one must keep it in check.

Wow. This thread was entertaining and enlightening. Some laughs also.

It does seem interesting, and very much complicated. Especially once "emotions" are involved.
The SD thing is appealing, bc to me, its like youre "dating" therefore theres a mutual companionship that is sought after, amongst other things.
I wish it could all be so simple.
If only I had my very own Don Sterling. I could be a very "personal" assistant ....aaaah...
Him & V appear to be happy regardless of what others think.
Although i may disagree with about 90% of Kuhls posts...he does present an interesting an pov, that is much appreciated.
Hes even on topic

The main mistake that BOTH sides make when entering into the SD/SB world when they have had experience here, is that it will be EASIER than any other type of relationship/arrangement. It isn't. It is different and has different benefits and downsides but it isn't easier.

THANK YOU MPK; you are indeed a very wise classy LADY and definitely have MY respects. Thanks for understanding the basis of my POV albeit one full of sarcasm side bars...too bad we never could hook up for the office fantasy role play

If only I had my very own Don Sterling. Originally Posted by MsPrittiKitti

The suspense is killing me - Roger Sterling, or Don Draper?