Every review I get

And you don't seem to understand that posts like Rapcat's just mean that guys that see a ts provider will never admit to it. How does that help anyone?

You really think some other guys opinion will make a guy choose to spend his hard earned money on some other fantasy that doesn't excite him as much as a TS? All the negativity (again I'll stress I mean posts such as Rapcats) just means that it all stays UTR as much as possible. People will still do what they want to.

There are providers who refuse to see gents that review SWs. Other hobbyists give guys a hard time about seeing SWs. Do you really think a guy will give up his bit of cheap strange at the end of the month? No! He'll just choose to not review his (mis)adventures and keep on keeping on.

Again, I am not saying that you should stop posting statistics so people can make an "informed choice" but posts that are obviously aimed at shaming a hobbyist's choice of provider just aren't as helpful to your goals in the end.

Are you suggesting that shame and ridicule has no effect on people in regards to their habits?

I tend to think it does.

It's when they find acceptance that they get comfortable and careless....

That's just my opinion on the subject.

Others have raised a valid point in regards to seeing ladies that are sensitive to and support thrannies and the guys that see them. It's simply added risk....

And you don't seem to understand that posts like Rapcat's just mean that guys that see a ts provider will never admit to it. How does that help anyone?

You really think some other guys opinion will make a guy choose to spend his hard earned money on some other fantasy that doesn't excite him as much as a TS? All the negativity (again I'll stress I mean posts such as Rapcats) just means that it all stays UTR as much as possible. People will still do what they want to.

There are providers who refuse to see gents that review SWs. Other hobbyists give guys a hard time about seeing SWs. Do you really think a guy will give up his bit of cheap strange at the end of the month? No! He'll just choose to not review his (mis)adventures and keep on keeping on.

Again, I am not saying that you should stop posting statistics so people can make an "informed choice" but posts that are obviously aimed at shaming a hobbyist's choice of provider just aren't as helpful to your goals in the end. Originally Posted by SA Angel

Angel I appreciate your responses, I truly do. But you missed the barn...you "obviously" aren't getting my meaning. So I'll dumb it down a bit. (Not calling you dumb, but your post above is a touch condescending so grant me my leave to respond in kind).

I don't expect to change a gay mans desire to ram his dick in another mans ass. That's never been my intension at all.

What I hope to do is encourage girls to take a bit more time in looking at the guys handles who see the trannys...and not schedule them.



Tell me you understand it now?

Angel I appreciate your responses, I truly do. But you missed the barn...you "obviously" aren't getting my meaning. So I'll dumb it down a bit. (Not calling you dumb, but your post above is a touch condescending so grant me my leave to respond in kind).

I don't expect to change a gay mans desire to ram his dick in another mans ass. That's never been my intension at all.

What I hope to do is encourage girls to take a bit more time in looking at the guys handles who see the trannys...and not schedule them.



Tell me you understand it now? Originally Posted by Toyz

Sorry but this is one time when your obviously not getting the point. Because we both obviously get that your goal is to stop girls from seeing tranny fuckers. If the hobbyists don't write the reviews, how can they make the "informed" decision to NOT see them?

I don't see where she's being condescending either but oh well.

It's kinda funny how so many guys claim they don't tell the girls who to see in the context of a nba thread,but if it's a guy all dolled up that goes right out the window.

Sorry but this is one time when your obviously not getting the point. Because we both obviously get that your goal is to stop girls from seeing tranny fuckers. If the hobbyists don't write the reviews, how can they make the "informed" decision to NOT see them?

I don't see where she's being condescending either but oh well.

It's kinda funny how so many guys claim they don't tell the girls who to see in the context of a nba thread,but if it's a guy all dolled up that goes right out the window. Originally Posted by NikkiWhite

No...she didn't get it...slow your defensive roll and read for understanding Nikki. Here I'll post it so you can read it in context...I know this will piss you off cause you don't like being challenged, but you too don't seem to get where I'm leading here.



"You really think some other guys opinion will make a guy choose to spend his hard earned money on some other fantasy that doesn't excite him as much as a TS"?

I don't know what else to present you with if you don't see this.

Its NOT against eccie rules (currently) for Tranny reviews to be posted or for Hoogars to fuck tranny fuckers...I'm not saying its against the rules at all. These guys have every right to post their ads, review their trannys, and schedule hoogars back to back after they pull their dicks out of the guys ass...no rules against it at all.

I GET that you & Angel want no one to challenge the tranny fuckers & then they'll get more comfortable with writing reviews...and convince other guys that because they aren't symptomatic that there is no added risk. To me that's just ignoring the issue. I'm not one to ignore things.

My purpose in responding to all the tranny fuckers & sympathizers is merely education for the Hoogars of the risks they undertake when seeing tranny fuckers. (If there is a less offensive term let me know, but its pretty accurate methinks).


{{{Plus its an engaging and interesting topic...and its pretty polarizing for a chat board...interesting to see who comes out on which side and who sits in the shadows}}}

It's kinda funny how so many guys claim they don't tell the girls who to see in the context of a nba thread,but if it's a guy all dolled up that goes right out the window. Originally Posted by NikkiWhite

Were you a Sesame Street kid?

Black Man / Transsexual = "One of these things is not like the other".......

It's kinda funny how so many guys claim they don't tell the girls who to see in the context of a nba thread,but if it's a guy all dolled up that goes right out the window. Originally Posted by NikkiWhite

I'm going to respond to this separately. This is an example of whats termed "minimizing". The technique uses "soft" words like "all dolled up" to replace "taking a mans dick up the ass". It absolutely IGNORES the base concern of a high risk group versus a RACE.


Its not apples to apples...

You're better than that. Argue on merit instead of sleight of hand.

Just curious, if it's a woman taking it up the ass instead of a guy, do you consider that ok? Same sex act, the catcher is just an innie instead of an outie.

Just curious, if it's a woman taking it up the ass instead of a guy, do you consider that ok? Same sex act, the catcher is just an innie instead of an outie. Originally Posted by redbeard42

I'm playin' the odds RB. I've stated the statistics. Fool added more relevant local statistics for Austin in a separate thread.

I'm not hatin' on gays. I'm hatin' on gays stuffing their cocks inside of girls after fucking a guy in the ass.

It puts the main stream guy and girl hobbiers IN that high risk group through no choice of their own.

Gays (trannys & tranny fuckers) make the choice knowing the ultra high risk...

And I'll continue to state that none of this is against the rules of eccie...this is just mine (and many others) OPINION...just an opinion.

Are the statistics coming from covered or uncovered play?

Angel I appreciate your responses, I truly do. But you missed the barn...you "obviously" aren't getting my meaning. So I'll dumb it down a bit. (Not calling you dumb, but your post above is a touch condescending so grant me my leave to respond in kind).

I don't expect to change a gay mans desire to ram his dick in another mans ass. That's never been my intension at all.

What I hope to do is encourage girls to take a bit more time in looking at the guys handles who see the trannys...and not schedule them.



Tell me you understand it now? Originally Posted by Toyz

I always understood?

How is Rapcat's BS "active prevention"? I said multiple times that they were the type of posts I was talking about.

That sentence you quoted to Nikki is just me reiterating that no matter what men WILL continue to see TS. So we can either do some gay or TS bashing and not have the info or shut the the trolls up and post statistics and the fact that hobbyists do not want to take the percieved/actual risk.

Hoogar math is legend. Even if a girl isn't concerned enough about the risk the bottom line might be more convincing.

P.S. Try TS instead of "tranny" and lover or enthusiast instead of fucker. Only the the first substitution is needed to reduce your aggro by 30%.

Anyways because people seriously aren't getting it.

Nobody said u think it's against the rules. Your literally agreeing with me but arguing. If u want the girls to make an informed decision they have to actually know who is chucking the TS providers.

I seriously don't understand why people think I'm defensive or upset... maybe I should add some cartwheels and gum drops to every comment.

Were you a Sesame Street kid?

Black Man / Transsexual = "One of these things is not like the other".......
Originally Posted by Whispers

I think you tried to make a joke I just can't find it! Can I borrow your bifocals?

Anyways because people seriously aren't getting it.

Nobody said u think it's against the rules. Your literally agreeing with me but arguing. If u want the girls to make an informed decision they have to actually know who is chucking the TS providers.

I seriously don't understand why people think I'm defensive or upset... maybe I should add some cartwheels and gum drops to every comment. Originally Posted by NikkiWhite

Well, you are still under 30 so any opinion you post requires "LOL" or a minimum of 12 smileys or you are in a bad mood. True fact.

Old hags like me get away with being crotchety

Well, you are still under 30 so any opinion you post requires "LOL" or a minimum of 12 smileys or you are in a bad mood. True fact.

Old hags like me get away with being crotchety Originally Posted by SA Angel

Lol if only they realized I only care about these conversations on the toilet or when my kid wants to play alone lol