Why A Yes Vote For The Iran Nuclear Deal Is A No-Brainer

Facts? Yes, because that's what conjecture passes for around here, I guess. None of this is factual. It's all conjecture, nothing more. That you think it's fact is fucking hilarious.


How exactly did Lusty Tard hand anything to me? He said the sanctions didn't work in another thread, now he's in here saying they did, but only on the 'non-nuclear' part of the economy, whatever the fuck that is. Never seen that definition in an economic breakdown before, but I guess we're making shit up as we go. Originally Posted by WombRaider

So, they were working so good that it brought them back to the table, where they got a new deal you say is now better for them, so I guess they really didn't work. Well, they worked for the Iranians, I guess. Originally Posted by WombRaider

As usual, you're not making any sense. Is this where you say you're just fucking with us? Anything but to admit Odumbo couldn't negotiate his way out of a brown paper bag once he got the Iranians to the table.

.

As usual, you're not making any sense. Is this where you say you're just fucking with us? Anything but to admit Odumbo couldn't negotiate his way out of a brown paper bag once he got the Iranians to the table.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

I'm making perfect sense. You said the sanctions were working and that's why the Iranians returned to the table. More sanctions to affect the 'non-nuclear' part of their economy? The dirty little secret that you won't admit is there is no good deal when the other party is not ultimately bartering in good faith. Iran can promise whatever we wish and then they can do whatever they will. They make promises and then they go on state television and tell their people how weak the deal is for us and how great it is for them. What would you expect them to say? Obama and the administration go on American TV and say it's strong for us. It's how geopolitics works. We got the best deal we were ever going to get. We were not in a position of strength and there's nothing that Obama or anyone else could have done to change that.

Anything but to admit Odumbo couldn't negotiate his way out of a brown paper bag once he got the Iranians to the table.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

What specifically do you not like about the deal?

Side question , do you like the fact that we are opening trade with Cuba.

Along with WTF'S question why you fucktrds all think Obie and Kerry were the only ones at the table, and no other country has any skin in the game.

Whether you are against it or not , the no vote will not survive a veto from Obama.


I will say this....you dumb fucks who supported the Iraq War sure didn't care about Iran's power enhancement that war provided! Even the current PM of Israel...


http://www.timesofisrael.com/kerry-a...2003-iraq-war/
“The prime minister was profoundly forward-leaning and outspoken about the importance of invading Iraq,” Kerry told the House Foreign Affairs Committee, in an apparent attempt to delegitimatize Netanyahu’s evaluation of the threat posed by the Iranian nuclear program.



. Originally Posted by WTF

Well I guess there were 77 dumb fuck Democrats including VP Biden, Presidential hopeful (hmmmm) Hillary Rodham Clinton, and lest we not forget
Secretary of State John Kerry.
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Breaux (D-LA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Edwards (D-NC)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA) Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)


As far a "great deal" with Iran, yup, it is a "great deal" for Iran, they give up nothing and gain 150 billion dollars, which of course Secretary of State Kerry claims its only 50 billion (OK, I feel safer now), and where does one think they money is going? Now that is definitely what one might consider a "great deal". (One lacking brain matter, of course)
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive...clear-deal.php

SLUNT ALERT! SLUNT ALERT!

Still living in the cloud of 9/11 I see, Granny.

That argument makes soooo much sense today.

About as much as your hawkish viewpoint. You'd prefer another confrontation, I suppose. War is the only way. Must be good for your dwindling business.

That argument makes soooo much sense today. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Makes more sense than wtf's attempts to re-write history.

Well I guess there were 77 dumb fuck Democrats including VP Biden, Presidential hopeful (hmmmm) Hillary Rodham Clinton, and lest we not forget Secretary of State John Kerry. Originally Posted by Cherie

Is your name pronounced ... "Sha.....ree" .... or "Sherry"? Which ever ...

Cherie, the liberal "agenda" is founded on the premises that all others have short memories with intellectual and analytical deficiencies ..... like

.. this is a disaster for the environment .....

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...mokestacks.jpg

but this will soon dissipate and has no effect on the environment ...

https://s1.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/t...142538-508.jpg

Ask the geniuses on the board here what the score will be in the Texans-FortyNiners game played on Saturday, August 15, 2015. Will the Texans win?

Another "quality" of liberals.

LLIdiot hasn't het answered the question of whether he'd still favor the very invasion you claim to revere, Slunt.

At least you e got a set of balls. may not be yours but you've got them.

LLIdiot has No Balls At All... But he does show his patriotism with a Red Beige and Blue signature line.

Hhahahahahahahahahahah

Well I guess there were 77 dumb fuck Democrats including VP Biden, Presidential hopeful (hmmmm) Hillary Rodham Clinton, and lest we not forget
Secretary of State John Kerry.
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Breaux (D-LA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Edwards (D-NC)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA) Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)


As far a "great deal" with Iran, yup, it is a "great deal" for Iran, they give up nothing and gain 150 billion dollars, which of course Secretary of State Kerry claims its only 50 billion (OK, I feel safer now), and where does one think they money is going? Now that is definitely what one might consider a "great deal". (One lacking brain matter, of course)
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive...clear-deal.php Originally Posted by Cherie

Tell me what YOU think a great deal would have been....one the Iranians would have went along with

Cherie, the liberal "agenda" is founded on the premises that all others have short memories with intellectual and analytical deficiencies ..... like

. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Short memories...you fuckers memory of history would have us believe that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and that the occupation was a success!

I guess Vietnam was a success. If you were Japanese you'd think WWII was going great but the liberal Japs surrendered to fucking early!

There is nothing more ridiculous in this country than chicken hawks screaming for war and yet crying about the deficit and high taxes!

Makes more sense than wtf's attempts to re-write history. Originally Posted by gfejunkie

And more sense than WRTMF's attempts to hijack the thread, build strawmen, and tell other people "what they think."

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

he drew twice the excepted crowd when he was here earlier this week