if you know your stuff, you would know not to post on threads more than 30 days old.
Originally Posted by pmdelites
I believe you are referring to the *30* day or more policy listed as rule #13 on the forum posting guidelines.
I can see no reason why your response warranting being added to the discussion. You open with a derogatory statement that demonstrates a lack of knowledge regarding the true meaning behind my screen name. Then, you proceeded to chastise me powered only by an incorrect understanding of the guidelines for posting.
The 30 day limit was clearly written to govern posts in review forums, not discussion threads.
[Taken from ECCIE General Conduct Guidelines]
"#13 -
In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones.
This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.