TS, Gay and Bisexual Guys that see straight Female hookers are putting us all at risk, especially you black, gay (on the DL) motherfuckers...

I do not support this original post. I did not even read the link. I never will. I know the math of life in general and choose not to focus on emotional trigger points. I believe, most likely, the op it was angry and emotionally driven, but so was your response.

That said, I write this not in support of deviant bashing, but in truth. Facts still matter. You speak of non heterosexual behavior as some form of evolution, or at the very least the social acceptence thereof. There is no genesis here and let us not qibble over my use of the term deviant. I am not hating. I do not care where consenting adults put their parts but only a human man coupled with a human woman can create human life.The organs are, by design, for reproduction, not pleasure.


Why does anyone give a... Originally Posted by lizardking
For the most part people do not give a shit what another does until they try doing it in their personal space.

Freedom Originally Posted by lizardking
Freedom is not free. It is very expensive. Some of this issue are the costs involved.

Ignorant, bigoted, uneducated, unsophisticated assholes? Originally Posted by lizardking
Under your arguement, your quoted demostration of lack of tolerance, anger and insulting distain for those who believe counter could be equally defined as being an ignorant, bigoted, blah blah.

Is the idea of a tranny going into the ladies' room at Target really that terrifying? Originally Posted by lizardking
It seems to be terrifying to the biological, adoptive and or guardian parents of the child who is also using that ladies room or they would not be fighting it.

Imo. Go piss where the plumbing matches the pipe. Period.
lizardking's Avatar
. . . it was angry and emotionally driven, but so was your response. Originally Posted by Mythos
Nope. Abhorrence of intolerance and bigotry is not emotionally driven. As we live on a increasingly shrinking planet, tolerance is becoming a survival imperative. Sexual preference and related issues are so inconsequential that an individual's tolerance of those things serves as a type of litmus test to see who among us has the fundamental capacity to make it up the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.

You speak of non heterosexual behavior as some form of evolution, or at the very least the social acceptance thereof. Originally Posted by Mythos
Yes, acceptance is just that. See above. But the critical point is in no way limited to sexuality. Another's sexuality should be of so little concern that it hardly merits notice, much less regulation.

I am not hating. Originally Posted by Mythos
Yes you are, you just believe it's justified.

The organs are, by design, for reproduction, not pleasure. Originally Posted by Mythos
Wow. Should I address you formally as "Father" or "Reverend"? Where can I sign up for your abstinence class?

For the most part people do not give a shit what another does until they try doing it in their personal space. Originally Posted by Mythos
Public restrooms are really not "personal space".

Freedom is not free. It is very expensive. Some of this issue are the costs involved. Originally Posted by Mythos
I don't see the connection to the topic, but I don't disagree. I'm sure someone has written a bad country song about this.

Under your arguement, your quoted demostration of lack of tolerance, anger and insulting distain for those who believe counter could be equally defined as being an ignorant, bigoted, blah blah. Originally Posted by Mythos
There's some circular reasoning for you. If I'm intolerant of intolerance, then I'm a bigot? Is that how it goes? It's sorta like discriminating against "christians" by not allowing them to discriminate against other folks who have a different view of the world.

It seems to be terrifying to the biological, adoptive and or guardian parents of the child who is also using that ladies room or they would not be fighting it. Originally Posted by Mythos
Even Donald Fucking Trump, when asked about this subject, acknowledged that it didn't really seem to be a problem. It's quite like voter ID laws: a solution in search of a problem. Transgendered folks have apparently been using the public restrooms appropriate to their chosen gender identity for many, many years and without incident. Have you ever even heard of a problem? Any problem anywhere? I have not.

So, Mythos, thanks for helping to prove my points. Perhaps I'll be drunk and drooling over my keyboard some night and I'll return the favor.

As my avatar once famously remarked, "I'm gonna get my kicks before the whole shithouse goes up in flames!" I just hope someone doesn't set it on fire merely because there are some transgendered people in there.
lizardking, you're a clever bloke.
lizardking, you're a clever bloke. Originally Posted by honeyboo
No, he just wants to sound that way. His response to my post was telling enough. He is insane. He is a froze brain neanderthal walking along side those he despises tossing feces, just as guilty as they are. He rejects fact and clings to emotion. /yawn.

... butt, that evolutionalry ladder shit was pretty funny.
(pun intended)

...although... I think he may have been being serious...
rduke4923's Avatar
To your first sentence you could not be more wrong.
The only religion you can openly mock or insult publicly is Christianity.
Disparage Islam and the will be a firestorm.
The other religions all enjoy the same status except one.

Christians restrict the rights of other groups?
Buddy there is a New World Champ when it comes to that.
And if you go to confession this lot will still cut your head off.
Then again it is not politically correct to say that.

R Duke










Just on this point, at least here in the US, Christians (especially the more conservative ones) get more criticism simply because that's the predominant religion here. It's also generally the more conservative sects that push for restricting rights to other groups, so that also draws more attention to their actions.

But yes, other religions around the world also do plenty of terrible stuff to people (take Islam in Africa, etc.).
SweetDulce's Avatar
Nope. Abhorrence of intolerance and bigotry is not emotionally driven. As we live on a increasingly shrinking planet, tolerance is becoming a survival imperative. Sexual preference and related issues are so inconsequential that an individual's tolerance of those things serves as a type of litmus test to see who among us has the fundamental capacity to make it up the next rung on the evolutionary
e. Originally Posted by lizardking
Obviously you have not taken any sexual history classes or researched anything in history about sexual tolerance.
There are plenty of examples of societies with Total ACCEPTANCE and sometimes ENCOURAGEMENT of homosexuality, bisexuality, cross dressing, &transgenderness. So this puts your "evolution"theory to a quick halt.
I am not going to try to give you a lesson , if you really want to, do the research yourself. I will give u an easy example though. Just so u know I am not talking out my ass.
Check out the Spartan military.
BIGSEXY7852's Avatar
Obviously you have not taken any sexual history classes or researched anything in history about sexual tolerance.
There are plenty of examples of societies with Total ACCEPTANCE and sometimes ENCOURAGEMENT of homosexuality, bisexuality, cross dressing, &transgenderness. So this puts your "evolution"theory to a quick halt.
I am not going to try to give you a lesson , if you really want to, do the research yourself. I will give u an easy example though. Just so u know I am not talking out my ass.
Check out the Spartan military. Originally Posted by SweetDulce
But they were Greek. What do expect. When in Greece do what Greek's do!!!!!!!.....lol
lizardking's Avatar
Just so u know I am not talking out my ass. Originally Posted by SweetDulce
I don't think you're talking out of your ass, but you may be reading out of it.

You are certainly correct that many past cultures and societies have been very tolerant of varied sexual practices, but they typically made up for that "progressive" view in their intolerance - often expressed in violence - of differences in other areas, such as ethnicity, religion, or political philosophy. The Spartans are a pretty good example of this point, inasmuch as they were at war with their neighbors on a more or less constant basis over disputes of varying degrees of pettiness. (In fact, the Spartans had two kings, but the two could never be in the city at the same time. One governed the city, while the other stayed in the field with the army . . . which was almost always engaged in some conflict. But I digress . . .) The Spartans also kept slaves (or "helots"), typically pressed into service after falling in battle.

My point is precisely that sexuality and related issues are NOT the point ("But the critical point is in no way limited to sexuality. Another's sexuality should be of so little concern that it hardly merits notice, much less regulation.") Rather, my argument is that humans have to figure out a way to live with a myriad of differences in their neighbors - race, religion, politics, philosophy, sports team affiliation, bad taste in holiday decorations . . . its an endless list. Of all the possible points of difference, sexuality should be waaaaaay down on the list of significance. In fact, a good argument might be that acceptance of varied sexual practices is so fundamental to peaceful coexistence that even the fucking Spartans had it figured out.

But, by all means, keep reading. You'll get better at it. You'll probably find, for example, that acceptance of pansexuality was not limited to the Spartan military or even all of Sparta. It was common in ancient Greek culture, generally. In fact, such acceptance was common in almost all ancient cultures because pansexulaity was recognized for what it is: a naturally-occurring phenomena. You'll also find that biological and social evolution are not matters of steady forward progress. We might gain ground in one area, while at the same time regressing in another.
SweetD,

Don't even bother responding to the pompous hypocritical blowhard. "...keep reading. You'll get better at it." This cocktard is so full of shit it pours from every orifice, most likely because he keeps his designed exit blocked with penis.
lizardking's Avatar
Thanks! It's so damned convenient when someone challenges your point and, in doing so, proves it. And you've done it twice now. Let's see if I can follow your latest "logic": I object to silly regulations intended to address non-existent "problems" presented by the mere presence of transgendered people in our midst who, from time to time, have to relieve themselves, therefore I am a homosexual and should be ignored.

I do declare . . . I believe I've been Trumped! I'll bet you want to build a wall around the ladies' room and make the trannies pay for it, right?

BTW, I think someone's looking for you on another website:

Dear Creepy Heterosexual Men Guarding Our Bathrooms
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kasey-..._10105512.html
It's so very sad to see them ooz on themselves, you want to do something, butt (oh corked shit that pun again!) if you do, you may stunt their evolutionary ladder climbing process. Even more so, as I did not really agree with this entire thread existing... yet the bumps keep on.

...sigh
jbravo_123's Avatar
To your first sentence you could not be more wrong.
The only religion you can openly mock or insult publicly is Christianity.
Disparage Islam and the will be a firestorm.
The other religions all enjoy the same status except one. Originally Posted by rduke4923
Bullshit.

Donald Trump openly insults Islam and he's now the Republican nominee.

People openly hold anti-Islam rallies and conventions. President Obama is regularly accused of being a Muslim when he is actually a Christian.

Christians restrict the rights of other groups?
Buddy there is a New World Champ when it comes to that.
And if you go to confession this lot will still cut your head off.
Then again it is not politically correct to say that.

R Duke Originally Posted by rduke4923
As previously stated, here in the United States, yes Christians are the ones that generally try to oppress others.

Just recently in Houston, a Republican pastor city council staff member tried to block the appointment of another member because that person was a Muslim.

In Old Spring, the Satanic Temple, which is a religion that is one of the most devoted to actual freedom of religion for all, is regularly attacked and has their building vandalized, likely by "good Christians".

Our own governor took down a display in the capitol (while leaving a Nativity scene up) depicting the Founding Fathers and the Bill of Rights.
rduke4923's Avatar
Bullshit.

Donald Trump openly insults Islam and he's now the Republican nominee.

People openly hold anti-Islam rallies and conventions. President Obama is regularly accused of being a Muslim when he is actually a Christian.



As previously stated, here in the United States, yes Christians are the ones that generally try to oppress others.

Just recently in Houston, a Republican pastor city council staff member tried to block the appointment of another member because that person was a Muslim.

In Old Spring, the Satanic Temple, which is a religion that is one of the most devoted to actual freedom of religion for all, is regularly attacked and has their building vandalized, likely by "good Christians".

Our own governor took down a display in the capitol (while leaving a Nativity scene up) depicting the Founding Fathers and the Bill of Rights. Originally Posted by jbravo_123
My bad I guess our definition of oppression is different.
I would post about the christian "Honor killings" but there are not any.
I could post about the stories about acid being thrown on women by christians but I could not find any.
There are Muslims here ( Michigan) now insisting on Sharia Law in "their" communities the same way they are in Europe.
That is all HERE in the States.

You are right the burning alive of caged christians, or drowning or
good old fashion crucifying is off shore so what does it really matter.

The Jews have a great word, "Schmuck". For me it is right up there with Fucktard but that is just a personal observation and completely off topic so pardon my wandering off subject.

R Duke

P.S.
Both the stories you posted to support you argument are a joke.
Pistolero's Avatar
Take the political crap to the Political forum and keep it there.