Watch the videos, Then come back and tell us how smart, honest and competent Hillary is. You will look and sound like a fool, as usual, but you can do it.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
One more time here is rule 18 USC 1924
18 USC 1924
(a)Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
1. The staffer who sent Hilliary the SAP email did not label it Classified or Top Secret. Not knowing that it actually was Top Secret is reckless as Comey said. Being reckless, you lose your authorization to handle classified material. You do not go to jail as per rule 18 USC 1924. You must knowlingly remove the record from the server on the secure network with the intent to retain the record in an authorized location. Hilliary did not remove any classified information from the server on the secure network. The email was not MARKED with the correct security classification when it was sent to her. The SAP email cannot be used to prove that she violated rule 18 USC 1924. You can argue that "she should have known or was negligent. Being stupid as you say does not put you in jail.
2. Hilliary only wanted to separate her personal emails from the work related emails. She was not going to separate 60,000 emails all by herself. You have her in a catch 22 situation. That is not the intent of the USC rules. The FOIA rule does not mean they can have her personal emails.
3. As Greta Van Susteren on Fox said Comey can hold his head high. He ruled correctly according to the USC rules as stated.
Doesn't sound dumb to me.