
Good try on the trolling though!

What does charitable giving have to do with taxes? Originally Posted by SillyGirlLess taxation means that there is more wealth (well, representation of wealth at least) in the hands of the citizenry. This means that they will have more money to voluntarily donate to charity. Extorting charity donations via taxation and government aid, even for a seemingly good cause, is still wrong.
Less taxation means that there is more wealth (well, representation of wealth at least) in the hands of the citizenry. This means that they will have more money to voluntarily donate to charity. Extorting charity donations via taxation and government aid, even for a seemingly good cause, is still wrong. Originally Posted by Philhelm
Be that as it may, in the original context the question was irrelevant and I was questioning what point he was trying to make. Subsequent responses indicate a desire to get into a "I know you are but what am I" type argument. Originally Posted by SillyGirlMy comment wasn't based on any context. I was just answering the question on its own merits.
lmao...sure you would..and i would like to know how much of your cash business you pay taxes on..do tell..lmao. Originally Posted by deaconThat's an unfair question. Obviously, certain people here would pay an income tax if the hobby weren't driven underground. On the other hand, some of the ladies may very well make payments to the IRS in order to not deal with potential problems (By the way, I hear the IRS was given some combat shotguns last year, which have a barrel length that would be illegal for us mere peasants...I wonder what those will be used for...).
And on a different note, but back on topic..........I had seen an article which had stated that 50 workers had stayed behind in the nuclear reactor in order to hopefully prevent a total meltdown. That's damned heroic. I can't help but wonder if we would see such a glorious display of character in the U.S. at this point in time. Not necessarily as upbeat as your examples, but a fine tale of courage nonetheless.
They found a 4 month old baby alive and was able to return it to the parents. Also a 70 yr old woman. There are a few bright moments to this.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/2011031...fullworldyahoo Originally Posted by MsElena
I had seen an article which had stated that 50 workers had stayed behind in the nuclear reactor in order to hopefully prevent a total meltdown. That's damned heroic. I can't help but wonder if we would see such a glorious display of character in the U.S. at this point in time. Not necessarily as upbeat as your examples, but a fine tale of courage nonetheless. Originally Posted by PhilhelmChernobyl also had its share of heroes that gave their lives to help mitigate that accident. Fortunately the tragedy in Japan (from a Nuclear standpoint) doesn't seem to be as bad as what Chernobyl was. I don't believe its a matter of nationality and that when the need arises in this country we also have our share of heroes as well. I believe Heroism is a characteristic of the human condition and not a product of nationality. Nevertheless, God bless those who risk their lives for the safety of others!!