Saying you did and then bloviating means nothing ...Speaking of bloviating you just did a excellent job of it.
... even if you think you are qualified to discuss what people were "really trying to say" ...
... I just finished listening to a guy like you, who was a Democrat Elector ... who was trying to explain why he wanted an immediate briefing for the Electors by Monday so they could have the information to "vote" on ... but recognized their obligation to vote according to their respective State's decision regarding who won the Electoral votes for that State.
... In an effort to void appearing ridiculous the conversation morphed into a "bi-partisan" investigation into the Russian hacking "that everyone knew had occurred" ...
He probably couldn't vote the last time the SCOTUS said you can't change the rules after the election .... !!! Now, just to save you a lot of stressful hand-wringing ... that was a PARAPHRASE of what the SCOTUS opined in the Gore vs. Bush fiasco!
That's one of those "history repeats itself" events when one doesn't study carefully the facts associated with it!!!
Criminals, like the Clintons and their loyalists trying to steal the election, strain to explain a legitimacy for their behavior when caught in the middle of the criminal act. This is no exception. Merry Christmas, which is not about "Santa"... duffus ... otherwise it would be called "Merry Santamas"! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Santa was brought up by you. Got short term memory loss?
