20 % tax genius

Most important point is to not have a tax on Mexican Beer coming north. Period (just like Privus).

If Tequila prices rise, I will BE OUTRAGED!!!!

Yep, FAKE news again.

Unlike the 3-5 million people who denied Twitler the popular vote!

LMAO!

https://www.quora.com/Does-Mexico-ha...outhern-border

Inquiring minds are taking a flashback look at the Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed by president Bush.

The Secure Fence Act of 2006’s goal is to help secure America’s borders to decrease illegal entry, drug trafficking, and security threats by building 700 miles (1,100 km) of physical barriers along the Mexico-United States border. Additionally, the law authorizes more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting as well as authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the use of advanced technology like cameras, satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles to reinforce infrastructure at the border. Congress approved $1.2 billion in a separate homeland security spending bill to bankroll the fence, though critics say this is $4.8 billion less than what’s likely needed to get it built.

The final roll call shows both Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton voted for the bill.

The border is a lot linger than that. I

Inquiring minds are taking a flashback look at the Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed by president Bush.

The Secure Fence Act of 2006’s goal is to help secure America’s borders to decrease illegal entry, drug trafficking, and security threats by building 700 miles (1,100 km) of physical barriers along the Mexico-United States border. Additionally, the law authorizes more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting as well as authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the use of advanced technology like cameras, satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles to reinforce infrastructure at the border. Congress approved $1.2 billion in a separate homeland security spending bill to bankroll the fence, though critics say this is $4.8 billion less than what’s likely needed to get it built.

The final roll call shows both Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton voted for the bill. Originally Posted by veedub63

excellent point. did not then 2008 candidate for Prez Obama say he'd secure the borders, continuing Bush's initiative only to ignore it on purpose for 8 years? he did.

The border is a lot linger than that. I Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

well now that you've had a geography lesson, what do you say about Obama intentionally not securing the border? and .. allowing millions to flood into this country?


the world awaits your reply

excellent point. did not then 2008 candidate for Prez Obama say he'd secure the borders, continuing Bush's initiative only to ignore it on purpose for 8 years? he did.

well now that you've had a geography lesson, what do you say about Obama intentionally not securing the border? and .. allowing millions to flood into this country?


the world awaits your reply Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Show me the facts on Obama allowing millions to flood into this country. If your claim is correct, than millions must have left during his admin because there is research showing the number of illegals in the US have been relatively stable the last 8-10 years. Here is my source: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...on-in-the-u-s/

Where is(are) your source(s)?

Bush and Obama LIED, of course. They knew the harms of illegal immigration and knew that most Americans can see these harms and are dismayed. They didn't act however because their contributors are employers who hire these peasants and peons and didn't want their illegal activities disturbed.

Trump on the other hand isn't beholden to anyone except the voters.

'Nuff said.

Show me the facts on Obama allowing millions to flood into this country. If your claim is correct, than millions must have left during his admin because there is research showing the number of illegals in the US have been relatively stable the last 8-10 years. Here is my source: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...on-in-the-u-s/

Where is(are) your source(s)? Originally Posted by EagleEye

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ob...rticle/2601621

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...to-us-exploit/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...americans-u-s/

http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/04/ob...is-inadequate/

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ob...rticle/2601621

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...to-us-exploit/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...americans-u-s/

http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/04/ob...is-inadequate/ Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

One article cites apprehensions, not people that actually got through. The others point to same person (Rep Goodlatte) on estimates, not actual amounts. And those range in the 1000/10Ks not millions. Yes, all evidence points to millions IN the US, but that has happened over multiple administrations, both GOP and Dems.

Is everyone, on both left and right so doctrinaire that they have forgotten how to think critically?

Just like finding a provider... do research, ask questions, think with the big head and not some other body part.

They need us more than we need them. They'll come around. Originally Posted by gfejunkie

You are so right. The common people in Mexico are poorer under NAFTA, which has ruined the corn farmers and drove wages down rather than up.

The people benefiting from all the American factories now in Mexico are only the elites of that imprisoned country.