Police stared started

Oh I do like to bet. I'll make a friendly wager. What kind of time frame do you think Trump will be out of the White House?

Take me up on the bet? Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

The irony of old skank Ellen using the term "snowflake" is pretty funny. She is the ultimate snowflake: weak, bothered by every insult to poor, poor Donald Trump. Awww, grandma snowflake. Don't worry. Go to your special safe place. Nobody will say bad things about Trump in your special safe place!

The irony of old skank Ellen using the term "snowflake" is pretty funny. She is the ultimate snowflake: weak, bothered by every insult to poor, poor Donald Trump. Awww, grandma snowflake. Don't worry. Go to your special safe place. Nobody will say bad things about Trump in your special safe place!

Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

Damn Cappy......How many handles do you have? Isn't it against the rules to have multiple? Are you a chick or a dude? What the heck is going on here?

Damn Cappy......How many handles do you have? Isn't it against the rules to have multiple? Originally Posted by veedub63

I only have one handle. How many do you have? You seem to imply know something about having more than one handle. Share your secrets of how you are getting away with it! We won't tell!

I only have one handle. How many do you have? You seem to imply know something about having more than one handle. Share your secrets of how you are getting away with it! We won't tell! Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

You got some 'splainin to do....What gives? Why the multiple handles? Sneaky, sneaky. Can't hide now though.....

Here's a tip: Stop using the same damn devices. It's not always about the IP addy, some folks can get down to the physical......mac addy my man. mac addy. Oops for you.

Oh I do like to bet. I'll make a friendly wager. What kind of time frame do you think Trump will be out of the White House? Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Over. Under 6 to 18 months. Bonus ball he will be tried for treason

Seems like Politcal discourse has devolved into correct or incorrect stances resulting in an Insanely toxic atmo. Id much rather approach the issues from an objective, data grounded, Foundation. When we agree on the facts of an issue we can then work toward a solution and more accurately project the long term consequences of the solution implemented.

Seeing as the topic is the executive order dealing with immigration, it seems like it breaks this law

8 USC 1152: Numerical limitations on individual foreign states

From Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
CHAPTER 12-IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
SUBCHAPTER II-IMMIGRATION
Part I-Selection System

§1152. Numerical limitations on individual foreign states
(a) Per country level
(1) Nondiscrimination
(A) Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.
(B) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of State to determine the procedures for the processing of immigrant visa applications or the locations where such applications will be processed.

However upon further digging into the United States Code, the President as the head of the executive branch has hat loads of power. It would also be a fallacy to extend laws of a sovereign nation over people who arent afforded equal rights under the laws of said nation...I should probably look up the extent of coverage we give to people with visas and refugees/people seeking asylum.

Also note, and im sorry Im not fact sourcing this, the article in the 196x Covention clearly defining it being internationally illegal to turn away refugees facing persecution in their country of orgin.

Personally if the Republic doesn't fail, fracture, or fuck up royally while im alive, life will have been pretty sweet indeed.

In anycase I recommend observing the 2ND amendment if you are able. Just in case civil unrest leads to civil war. Sorry if I repeated anything, I generally skip over people shit talking one another and nonsense as rule.

If he continues to turn our country into a cheap, low-class reality TV show, people will oust him.

Steve Bannon has never cared about anybody and has Twitler by the nads. Probably has a piss tape of him, too.

Twitler is too reckless and narcissistic to have believe he needed to cover his tracks.

Pussy grabbing was idiotic but not against the Fucking Constitution.

If he isn't currently in violation of his oath of office, he will be in the next few weeks.

You got some 'splainin to do....What gives? Why the multiple handles? Sneaky, sneaky. Can't hide now though.....

Here's a tip: Stop using the same damn devices. It's not always about the IP addy, some folks can get down to the physical......mac addy my man. mac addy. Oops for you. Originally Posted by veedub63

LOL as I suspected. veedub , you seem to know a lot about using multiple handles... (and perhaps experience?)

But seriously, if you are worrying whether this is MY only handle, then by all means report me to the highest authority. I've got nothing to hide but perhaps you do... ?

Investigate. Do it. I'll be loving it as your paranoia consumes you!

Very good. I appreciate your comments.

Seems like Politcal discourse has devolved into correct or incorrect stances resulting in an Insanely toxic atmo. Id much rather approach the issues from an objective, data grounded, Foundation. When we agree on the facts of an issue we can then work toward a solution and more accurately project the long term consequences of the solution implemented.

Seeing as the topic is the executive order dealing with immigration, it seems like it breaks this law

8 USC 1152: Numerical limitations on individual foreign states

From Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
CHAPTER 12-IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
SUBCHAPTER II-IMMIGRATION
Part I-Selection System

§1152. Numerical limitations on individual foreign states
(a) Per country level
(1) Nondiscrimination
(A) Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.
(B) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of State to determine the procedures for the processing of immigrant visa applications or the locations where such applications will be processed.

However upon further digging into the United States Code, the President as the head of the executive branch has hat loads of power. It would also be a fallacy to extend laws of a sovereign nation over people who arent afforded equal rights under the laws of said nation...I should probably look up the extent of coverage we give to people with visas and refugees/people seeking asylum.

Also note, and im sorry Im not fact sourcing this, the article in the 196x Covention clearly defining it being internationally illegal to turn away refugees facing persecution in their country of orgin.

Personally if the Republic doesn't fail, fracture, or fuck up royally while im alive, life will have been pretty sweet indeed.

In anycase I recommend observing the 2ND amendment if you are able. Just in case civil unrest leads to civil war. Sorry if I repeated anything, I generally skip over people shit talking one another and nonsense as rule. Originally Posted by movinpeices

And if it's illegal, Ellen, will you advocate for its removal, or will you march, goosestep, with your Scheissefuhrer?

Grasshopper, being able to come to America is a privilege not a right. Hope that is simple enough for you to grasp.

And if it's illegal, Ellen, will you advocate for its removal, or will you march, goosestep, with your Scheissefuhrer? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

However upon further digging into the United States Code, the President as the head of the executive branch has hat loads of power. Originally Posted by movinpeices

Yes, he does. That's why no one challenged previous restrictions imposed by Carter and Obama on travel from certain countries.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline. (Cornell Law)

Also, there was a recent post claiming that 99% of the Syrian refugees we accepted last year were Muslim. If true, that would appear to discriminate against Christians since they make up 10% of that country's population.

Not the point, Snowflake.

And, bullshit, Troll.

^^^ how can a dipshit with 32,405 worthless posts like this have the chutzpah to call someone else snowflake or troll???