McAiullife, and Hillary's brother caught selling green cards.

So now that you see Trump does the same thing including his son in law you defended, you want to get all righteous?

You did not even know what you were talking about the whole time. That is pretty sad. But I must say it is not uncommon among conservatives though.

And while Trump may have been called out on it, why would you see others doing it worse than him?

And you even go so far as to blame the Dems for Trump. If it had not been such a freak show in the Republican primary he would not have won the nomination. That is on your team and possibly the Russians. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You have a reading comprehension problem.

Trump didn't do anything. Trump's son-in-law didn't do anything. One of Trump's many companies used a reference to his son-in-law in a brochure pitching visa related investments that were apparently valid(met all the requirements of the visa). That is relatively disgusting, but has almost nothing to do with Trump or his son-in-law.


Hillary's closest advisor, and her brother, went to China, and personally pitched visa related investment whose primary value were the political connections of the pitchers. The investments were apparently sham investments, as the related visas are being revoked. Hillary's closest advisor, and her brother used connections inside of Hillary's organization to facilitate, expedite, and control the Visa process for the people they took the money from. If you think this is acceptable behavior, you clearly have mental issues. Apparently Trump's company didn''t have this "help".

Those 2 situations are as comparable as sexual harassment, and asking someone on a date.

The media pilloried Trump for a situation he had almost nothing to do with, and where he didn't do anything wrong, and where he was campaigning to stop that very thing.

The media hid Hillary's situation, which is, upon retrospective analysis, a conflict of interest(she was campaigning to allow people to break immigration laws without consequence, which was directly helping her brother in this sort of thing).

Can you give me some evidence that Russia helped Trump win the primary?

You are an either an idiot, or completely unethical. Frankly, it is hard to tell with leftist.

You have a reading comprehension problem.

Trump didn't do anything. Trump's son-in-law didn't do anything. One of Trump's many companies used a reference to his son-in-law in a brochure pitching visa related investments that were apparently valid(met all the requirements of the visa). That is relatively disgusting, but has almost nothing to do with Trump or his son-in-law.


Hillary's closest advisor, and her brother, went to China, and personally pitched visa related investment whose primary value were the political connections of the pitchers. The investments were apparently sham investments, as the related visas are being revoked. Hillary's closest advisor, and her brother used connections inside of Hillary's organization to facilitate, expedite, and control the Visa process for the people they took the money from. If you think this is acceptable behavior, you clearly have mental issues. Apparently Trump's company didn''t have this "help".

Those 2 situations are as comparable as sexual harassment, and asking someone on a date.

The media pilloried Trump for a situation he had almost nothing to do with, and where he didn't do anything wrong, and where he was campaigning to stop that very thing.

The media hid Hillary's situation, which is, upon retrospective analysis, a conflict of interest(she was campaigning to allow people to break immigration laws without consequence, which was directly helping her brother in this sort of thing).

Can you give me some evidence that Russia helped Trump win the primary?

You are an either an idiot, or completely unethical. Frankly, it is hard to tell with leftist. Originally Posted by kehaar

Wow. You went from admonishing the "hillerites" for using the son-in-law, to saying it was okay when Trump did it. And just as you asserted they used her influence to seal the deal. so did the Trump folks.
Now you are saying they were sham investments. Bullshit. Do you research anything? I would say no. And your Hillary breaking immigration laws is bullshit. Answer this, If she was telling them to break the law, why would they use the EB-5 option?
As for Russia, do you know the meaning of "possibly"
When I do not have the facts I may speculate but I am not so "sure" as you were in the beginning of this thread. Little by little your story has evolved into a Witch hunt. As for being a leftist I am far from that. Just as you admitted you do not like Trump I am not a Hillary fan. But I do know she would be better than Trump. Most of the stories about her are fabrications. I voted for Daryl Castle by the way.