You have been Grubered,.... Originally Posted by bamscram.. parroting again!
You just can't help yourself from looking stupid and ignorant.
At least with just one you would only look like half a nitwit!
.. parroting again!If you want to see stupid and ignorant, look in the mirror.
You just can't help yourself from looking stupid and ignorant.
At least with just one you would only look like half a nitwit! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Think your right on the nose.Thing is, since BOTH of their seats will more than likely go to OTHER libtards that the libtard governors of their state put up, ITS NO Actual loss for them to 'toss these 2 under the bus.'
I also think it's shameful though, it took more than one skeleton to fall out of Franken's closet before they called him out. Originally Posted by grean
This is the fundamental transformation of America that Obama talked about: We become a nation of men, not laws. Originally Posted by gnadflyHe certainly seemed to change us from a nation of 'innocent till PROVEN guilty and its Better to let 200 guilty scumbags go free, than to jail one innocent person wrongly", to where "WHO CARES IF THEY are guilty or not, fuck the lot of them over, even if afterwards we find out that the claims were false.."
This is the fundamental transformation of America that Obama talked about: We become a nation of men, not laws. Originally Posted by gnadflyWrong. ITS not the same. Just as its not the same to count someone done for having 2 spliffs in his car "For possession" as being the same as someone caught with 3 kilos of coke in the car.. YES both are druggies, but one is just a user, while the other is a DEALER and smuggler..
LL,So being merely accused of a crime should be a blocker to serve. BUT BEING GUILTY OF an actual crime.. NA.. WE've got several democracks Still in office even after being done for various crimes in the past..
I do understand that you are saying that people knew about Trump and voted for him anyway where Frankins actions were brought to light after the fact. It is entirely possible that they could have gone either way. Maybe they don't put him in office. It doesn't matter, now.
I'm saying that regardless of the mass's wishes, sexual harassment or assault disqualifies people from office.
If he cheated on his wife, and voters still decided to vote him in, that's different. Cheating isn't a criminal offense. Sexual assault is. Originally Posted by grean
Anybody want to ask Franken what it's like to be under the bus with Conyers? It's getting pretty crowded under there. Originally Posted by gfejunkiePity its only a 'proverbial bus they are getting tossed under'.
What do they get if they are successful in illegally booting Moore?You are assuming that if we DO get moore tossed out after winning, that the senator will annoint another conservative, when most likely it will be the RINO Moore beat out in the special election..
An appointed REPUBLICAN SENATOR and pissed of Alabama voters! Originally Posted by LexusLover
You are assuming that if we DO get moore tossed out after winning, that the senator will annoint another conservative, when most likely it will be the RINO Moore beat out in the special election.. Originally Posted by garhkal#1: I'm not "assuming" anything.
Did you hear his "remarks" today. He did not say he was resigning.
But IMO...politics aside....I don't think he should have resigned over this. I don't think there is a person on this board who can throw stones at him. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
Did you hear his "remarks" today. He did not say he was resigning.I've often wondered who has handled those tits of hers. You can't help but notice them. I wonder if she sucks dick?
He's still "thinking" it over. Rumor is he's not happy about being thrown under the bus and being the sacrificial lamb. It also appears he may hedging to see how Moore does next week.
It appears that he may not resign if more doesn't win....or the other speculation is he may wait to decide until he sees how the "holier than thou" treat Moore if he wins.
He has denied any wrong doing and it's a "misunderstanding"!
IMO Pelosi is just jealous he didn't grab her tits (if any)! Originally Posted by LexusLover
I've oven wondered who has handled those tits of hers. You can't help but notice them. I wonder if she sucks dick? Originally Posted by TheDaliLamaShe couldn't have gotten where she is on looks alone, and "we" know it wasn't intellect. Some guys just aren't picky. This Kleenex wonders probably have to be supplemented 2-3 times a day to keep that same botox look intact.
So you think you can sneak up behind me while I'm looking in the mirror? You really are stupid and ignorant. StandInShit needs another grab to make him feel manly. Help him!Don't need to sneak up to bitch slap you whenever needed.
Now parrot something! Originally Posted by LexusLover
She couldn't have gotten where she is on looks alone, and "we" know it wasn't intellect. Some guys just aren't picky. This Kleenex wonders probably have to be supplemented 2-3 times a day to keep that same botox look intact.bahahaaaaaa
Franken was not being "funny" today. But he's "hedging" for sure.
Speaking of ... I can imagine no females will claim their physical interaction with Franken was "consensual" in nature. Originally Posted by LexusLover