So how is no reviews allowed even enforceable? Sure the provider can get mad and not see you again, but if you don't care about that, they really have no recourse, right? Originally Posted by coronaLmaooo no fucks given
Wrong.They can adopt, wish, hope and pray that a review won't be posted up, eccie was created for the men. Am I missing something?
Eccie is not as good as ever, how do you come to that conclusion? But, I do agree that if it becomes a review only website, that would be fine, but there are providers who have said in other threads that they are going to adopt a no review policy, so if most providers do that, Eccie being a review site will also be out the window. Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote
No, he is not, but I think I saw Slubby and Wile on the list to disable their accounts, so maybe I should just go ahead a take care of that for them. Originally Posted by NamssaBEST post in this thread
Yes you absolutely should do that ...lol Originally Posted by Analeese2nd best post in this thread.
Eccie is not as good as ever, how do you come to that conclusion? Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote
No, he is not, but I think I saw Slubby and Wile on the list to disable their accounts, so maybe I should just go ahead a take care of that for them. Originally Posted by NamssaDear Hobby God, now as I lay my head upon my pillow, I just ask for one thing and one thing only. Please grant the request of Wile to disable his account, even though we know he probably has several more queued up to replace that one.
The multiple pages of members requesting their account to be deleted/disabled with many more to come, is going to be a tell tale sign of advertisers when it comes time to renew their subscription.
This site was just hanging on when it came to real hobbyists that shared real experiences because of all the bullshit reviews for promotion of a new provider, embelished to appease the provider to keep the backlash at a minimum and the totally fake ones for PA, but now, that rope is fraying to the point where most of who put up with the drama shit pot that is this site to use it as a screening/info share tool are abandoning ship for others and Eccie is totally useless now. Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote
Dear Hobby God, now as I lay my head upon my pillow, I just ask for one thing and one thing only. Please grant the request of Wile to disable his account, even though we know he probably has several more queued up to replace that one.Amen! Please hear us O'Lord
amen motor Originally Posted by motor
The multiple pages of members requesting their account to be deleted/disabled with many more to come, is going to be a tell tale sign of advertisers when it comes time to renew their subscription.You contradict yourself left and right imo . I’m not attacking you but in one post you are hyping up the fact that we need reviews to garner business and then the next post you get on one of your rants about all the bullshit reviews for promotion of a new provider. Isn’t that what you said this site is about ? Information sharing ? Peoole share information in different ways ..
This site was just hanging on when it came to real hobbyists that shared real experiences because of all the bullshit reviews for promotion of a new provider, embelished to appease the provider to keep the backlash at a minimum and the totally fake ones for PA, but now, that rope is fraying to the point where most of who put up with the drama shit pot that is this site to use it as a screening/info share tool are abandoning ship for others and Eccie is totally useless now. Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote
A little shift. I think we could predict the number of future Johns prosecuted for soliciting or whatever by counting the number of reviewers who have been arrested and did not have:Exactly. I love that it's so easy to just add that disclaimer and make yourself immune to any sort of trouble. Thank you mtabsw for bringing up this cogent point about adding a disclaimer. Now I understand why everyone has so much respect for you, you're a veritable fount of wisdom!
DISCLAIMER:
This is a work of fiction
At the beginning of their review, vs the number of Johns prosecuted who were stupid enough to not include that very valid legal protection in their words. Originally Posted by mtabsw
A little shift. I think we could predict the number of future Johns prosecuted for soliciting or whatever by counting the number of reviewers who have been arrested and did not have:Don't forget the ones who are telling us about their dreams.
DISCLAIMER:
This is a work of fiction
At the beginning of their review, vs the number of Johns prosecuted who were stupid enough to not include that very valid legal protection in their words. Originally Posted by mtabsw
A little shift. I think we could predict the number of future Johns prosecuted for soliciting or whatever by counting the number of reviewers who have been arrested and did not have:And what if the review is several years old and the parties in question are no longer available as a witness or defendant and the statute of limitations ran out?
DISCLAIMER:
This is a work of fiction
At the beginning of their review, vs the number of Johns prosecuted who were stupid enough to not include that very valid legal protection in their words. Originally Posted by mtabsw
And what if the review is several years old and the parties in question are no longer available as a witness or defendant and the statute of limitations ran out?
And how does a review actually prove the alleged “encounter” took place and money was exchanged? Subpoena hobby phone records? Review hotel security cameras (that’s purged after X number of days). Originally Posted by FunMonday