I dont think we need this bs here - its offensive

Free from stupidity or hive-thinking?

I totally agree with Footlong on this. His comments have absolutely nothing to do with racism but only about why call out a girl because she's narrow minded or a bad ad writer or whatever. Those of us who have been around here many years have seen these threads umpteen times and you get weary of all this politically correct posturing on a silly sex for money board. Let them beat these arguments to death out in the real world but this is just about paying for pussy not about the racial implications of ads for prostitution. OOPs I said the wrong "P" word! Beat me with rice noodles. It's not about whores or prostitutes. Those things are illegal. It's about "providing". We are whoredogs chasing prostitute pussy. Do we really need to discuss a ban on insulting or offensive statements in someone's ad? Most of the world could really see us as perverts. How silly is it to get into a heated discussion of the propriety of provider's preferences?

Notice the alliteration "It's peculiar to ponder of the propriety of prejudiced provider's preferences"

I agree. I also think it all goes under accepted ethics of an escort community...after all we argue about white-knighting, outing, alerting under whats morally accepted as right or wrong in an escort community. So if this is foolish, then all other rules go out the window as well...it's the building stones of how things are ran.

IT GOES WITH ANY RACE OR TYPE. For five years I would not see Mexicans.
And I Dated ONLY woman. Because I was married and mentally abused by a Mexican man had beautiful children by that man. How ever when I finially got divorved inside me I was scarred and I DO NOT HAVE TO NAME HIS NAME.
A person man or woman does what she or he must TO {FEEL SAFE}
The fact is they do not have to be on this board or even in this hobby to have scarred a woman.
This woman has issues and has some how been scarred I hope her wounds heal in less than five years. I probably missed out on a lot of cool friends because of my choice for five years.
I know in the last weak alone I have two very cool hispanic guys numbers in my phone and I thought that day would never happen where I would do that.
How shallow I was because I was hurt, wounded, scarred.
Just through my eyes....

Are you serious? We have a CDC expert here. Again...What ifs; What if worms had machine guns...birds wouldn't f.ck with them..

Off topic again Originally Posted by TrmaOne

no expert of anything just a google slut.. And was trying to get in ones mind which was a mistake from the jump. It is hard enough to contain and controll whats in my own mind much less figure out why in the world some one wrote the reason why she felt un safe from certain people..MY BAD!

Eccie has a no animals policy. If a gal specializes in 3ways with her pet ostrich, she cant advertise that here because of the rules. Fine. She can advertise here, get a website, link to that in her ad, and spell out her non eccie approved stuff on her website.

If Eccie had a no discrimination on basis of race in ad policy, same thing. A gal could advertise here, get a website, link to her website in ad and spell out her rules there.

Anyone who has read my comments over the years knows me to to be tolerant and open-minded. I accept, but dont like, discreet NBA policy announcements. But this "security risk" nonsense? No way. What's next? "Sorry I dont see black men because I dont like fried chicken and watermelon breath - nothing personal?

So, where do you draw the line?

Anyone who has read my comments over the years knows me to to be tolerant and open-minded.

So, where do you draw the line? Originally Posted by flinde

oh come on... In what possible way could your OP or subsequent comments be considered tolerant and open-minded? You got on here and bitched about being OFFENDED by SOMEONE ELSE'S business practices. You promoted the idea of BANNING NBA polices of providers... Tolerant, open-minded? What a crock. And btw, it's also not your privilege to be "drawing the line" on other people's policies. Please keep that Gestapo mindset inside your own head next time (you know, the place where you ARE master of the universe).

oh come on... In what possible way could your OP or subsequent comments be considered tolerant and open-minded? You got on here and bitched about being OFFENDED by SOMEONE ELSE'S business practices. You promoted the idea of BANNING NBA polices of providers... Tolerant, open-minded? What a crock. And btw, it's also not your privilege to be "drawing the line" on other people's policies. Please keep that Gestapo mindset inside your own head next time (you know, the place where you ARE master of the universe). Originally Posted by Bobave

If your gonna ask him to be tolerant and open-minded, then don't be so hypocritical yourself and be so biased/harsh on previous comments.

If your gonna ask him to be tolerant and open-minded, then don't be so hypocritical yourself and be so biased/harsh on previous comments. Originally Posted by deagogarcia

Wait... Where did I get on here and pontificate about being so tolerant and open minded... So how can I be hypocritical about that? LOL

I'm just waiting for the first lawsuit to be filed because a provider denied an AA client....and refused to provide services.

If we're talking about hiring an employee, or renting an apartment...only the color of the money should matter. Without knowing the motives of the poor girl...can't condemn her. I wouldn't want to see a provider I knew flat out I had no chemistry with, it would make for a very short session. Maybe AA doesn't turn her on. Maybe the companionship is an intimate act (the girls would have to weigh in on that one) -- which personally, I want a provider who really WANTS to pleasure me, not just going through the motions to get it over with.

During my "swinger" days, there parallel that I can draw from, I knew couples who would have threesomes ONLY with AA...should I have been offended and write them a nasty email? Call them out as racists? Some had an age limit of 40. Others would only see men with 9" on them. I KNOW what it's like to be told, sorry...we are not interested in seeing you. You move on, and click next. Same here.

Look at it this way...an NBA policy limits revenue. If she's ok with that, then that's her choice. Until Congress passes a law regarding equal access to companionship services, it is what it is....after all, they can't even pass a valid budget in the last 2+ years.

That's just my 2 cents, as I haven't yet provided it on any of the related threads.

easiest way I see this going away is simply having no policy...
and since the fees are for "time spent" this would be so basic
BECAUSE
the two of you could just sit in the hotel room for one hour and watch television...
I fail to see a problem

funny... I know i started something like this before but my views are a little different. Yes when I see a hottie and it says no black men I get a little upset but when I used to go threw the screen process and get turned away at the day I was a little more pissed.

I'm glad women put it up no black guys if thats their choice saves me time and money on a crappy time because she really dont like me.

I'm glad when its a part of the screening process because in my first PM i normally give my age/body build/race just to get it out the way a few turned me down but most laugh saying its not important

In case everyone here forgot when the ladies feel safe and have fun we all win so as long as no one gets hurt who cares what they say.

P.s. think its funny one of the first "black hobbiest" that got upset to this thread has an alert about them and shorting a lady money. If everyone just played nice Hobbying would be so much MORE fun.

Just my 2 cents.

Well, can we get passed this everyone? Just comes down to the basics...we all have our differences...but, everyone likes to have FUN!! So, let's all get together and have group FUN!! Yeah, baby!

Y'all say that like...they like all other guys simply because they're white, or Asian or whatever, as if they're going to fall all over themselves for these clients.

Line up men of different races, all bald and not let them speak, and let her select one, while blindfolded, and see how much or little she 'enjoys' the encounter. Looks and skin color are just bullshit reasons to be selective. My own selection process is, IS SHE HOT? If the answer is yes, then she'd be someone I'd want to see.

Race is NOT a determining factor on who you will like or not like, have a good time or not a good time with, etc. What's so hard about calling this crap what it truly is?

The more I think about this, the more I realize those who support this behavior are typically the ones who just can't fathom themselves being in this scenario. They're attitudes are based on not caring, not relating. If there was a way to put THEM out the other side....REPEATEDLY....over and over and over and over and over, I guarantee you they'd feel differently.