Was Hunter Biden qualified to serve on the Board of a Ukraine gas Company?

+1

Some dim-retard (Sleepy Joe?) told Burisma that adding Hunter to their BOD would help their sorry reputation. Instead it made them look even dumber and more corrupt. They should sue Hunter for their money back! Originally Posted by lustylad

Brings up another question....Was it against the law for Burisma to hire Hunter?

It does not appear so.


So...…

Why did Trump only appear interested in this company after Biden entered the race for 2020 President?

Brings up another question....Was it against the law for Burisma to hire Hunter?

It does not appear so.


So...…

Why did Trump only appear interested in this company after Biden entered the race for 2020 President?



Originally Posted by WTF

they never had an answer when I asked that.. the fumbled excuse was Trump didn't know about it, because the Left-wing media wouldn't report it. I then asked why didn't FOX or others find out and report it? no response.. seems to me if it was so bad, someone on the Right would have screamed about it in 2016.. maybe not, since Republicans have promoted nepotism for decades.

So a Mod on eccie is a "ultimate position of power" in your world?:mfr_l ol: Originally Posted by WTF

How you got this response from oeb's post is a telling. It showcases your poor reading comprehension and high regard for yourself.

They aren't 'my' threads but I have always loved threads to free flow....

Poor winn dixie comes crying in all the threads I happen to be in in wanting to bet he isn't as stupid as Rey Rey!

I even find that funny...or in winn dixie/reyrey cas , gay.


Originally Posted by WTF

You're the OP so, it's "your" thread.

But you knew that. That's why you put you traditional surrender flag in this post: homoeroticism.

How you got this response from oeb's post is a telling. It showcases your poor reading comprehension and high regard for yourself.

You're the OP so, it's "your" thread.

But you knew that. That's why you put you traditional surrender flag in this post: homoeroticism. Originally Posted by gnadfly

So you are a Mod and decided that this is my thread....

Are you trying to say the owner of this platform gave me this thread to do as I please? You said it is my thread.

Can I regulate dumbass lying posts such as yours? NO. Hmmmmm

Can I delete stupid lying posts such as yours from 'my' thread? NO. Hmmmmm

So according to you I own a thread I have no control over....or I have exactly as much control as any other poster on eccie.

Brings up another question....Was it against the law for Burisma to hire Hunter?

It does not appear so.


So...…

Why did Trump only appear interested in this company after Biden entered the race for 2020 President?
Originally Posted by WTF

they never had an answer when I asked that.. the fumbled excuse was Trump didn't know about it, because the Left-wing media wouldn't report it. I then asked why didn't FOX or others find out and report it? no response.. seems to me if it was so bad, someone on the Right would have screamed about it in 2016.. maybe not, since Republicans have promoted nepotism for decades. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

You guys do realize that the timing of the additional push for corruption investigations revolved around the timing of a new Ukraine incoming President.

You guys do realize that the timing of the additional push for corruption investigations revolved around the timing of a new Ukraine incoming President. Originally Posted by eccielover

that makes at least two of us that have pointed out that fact in this forum. let's also note that the incoming Ukraine president .. a actor/comic .. ran on an anti-corruption platform. so Trump asked him to look into .. wait for it .. corruption. and then there is that treaty Slick Willie signed. about cooperating in matters of criminal and corruption issues .. seems the key is corruption.


the Democrats would have a better case if this was the sitting Ukraine president with whom the current and former administration had an established track record with. but the former administration forced the former Ukraine administration to fire the former state prosecutor .. because he was investigating corruption by Burisma who was closely linked to high ranking officials of the former administration.








BAHHAHAAAAA

Obviously you don't realize that part of the impeachment inquiry is based on who gave the push to the new president to reopen the investigations.
Let me know when he testifies under oath that there was no quid quo pro or pressure.

That being said, we'll have to rely on the evidence we get from the testimony of the witnesses.

You guys do realize that the timing of the additional push for corruption investigations revolved around the timing of a new Ukraine incoming President. Originally Posted by eccielover

There goes that lying mouth again.

Your new defense has lies in it too.

Now let me hear you bray again for the coming impeachment like the lying jackas....liar you are.

that makes at least two of us that have pointed out that fact in this forum. let's also note that the incoming Ukraine president .. a actor/comic .. ran on an anti-corruption platform. so Trump asked him to look into .. wait for it .. corruption. and then there is that treaty Slick Willie signed. about cooperating in matters of criminal and corruption issues .. seems the key is corruption.


the Democrats would have a better case if this was the sitting Ukraine president with whom the current and former administration had an established track record with. but the former administration forced the former Ukraine administration to fire the former state prosecutor .. because he was investigating corruption by Burisma who was closely linked to high ranking officials of the former administration.








BAHHAHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Obviously you don't realize that part of the impeachment inquiry is based on who gave the push to the new president to reopen the investigations.
Let me know when he testifies under oath that there was no quid quo pro or pressure.

That being said, we'll have to rely on the evidence we get from the testimony of the witnesses.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/10/ukra...rump-call.html


Ukraine’s president says there was no blackmail in Trump call

"Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said there was no blackmail involved during a telephone call with President Trump that has set in motion an impeachment inquiry."


Ukraine president says there was no ‘blackmail’ in Trump phone conversation

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation...mp-impeachment


“There was no pressure or blackmail from the U.S.,” Volodymyr Zelensky said during a 14-hour series of meetings with Ukrainian and international journalists that were broadcast live from Kyiv on social media and several television channels.


'Nobody Pushed Me.' Ukrainian President Denies Trump Pressured Him to Investigate Biden's Son

https://time.com/5686305/zelensky-uk...rump-pressure/

There goes that lying mouth again.

Your new defense has lies in it too.

Now let me hear you bray again for the coming impeachment like the lying jackas....liar you are. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

if you say so.

that makes at least two of us that have pointed out that fact in this forum. let's also note that the incoming Ukraine president .. a actor/comic .. ran on an anti-corruption platform. so Trump asked him to look into .. wait for it .. corruption. and then there is that treaty Slick Willie signed. about cooperating in matters of criminal and corruption issues .. seems the key is corruption.


the Democrats would have a better case if this was the sitting Ukraine president with whom the current and former administration had an established track record with. but the former administration forced the former Ukraine administration to fire the former state prosecutor .. because he was investigating corruption by Burisma who was closely linked to high ranking officials of the former administration.








BAHHAHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

This is the reason why Obama was never impeached, lol.

You guys do realize that the timing of the additional push for corruption investigations revolved around the timing of a new Ukraine incoming President. Originally Posted by eccielover

You realize that Trump said nothing about corruption or Biden on the first call before Biden announced and after Bifen announced and was leading Trump in the polling and especially in the swing states....the next call that is all he asked about and some crowdsourced conspiracy theory.

So yes I've read up on the timelines and wtf actually happened.

Trump could have used the DOJ/FBI is he wanted the Bidens officially investigated. All he wanted was the announcement that they were being investigated. He knew the investigation would go nowhere because they had already been looked into and the timelines did not add up.

From https://theconservativetreehouse.com...d/#more-176609


Paul Manafort received a no-knock FBI raid at 2:00am for unregistered lobbying. The law offices of Michael Cohen were raided for Taxi medallion abuse. Roger Stone got the SWAT treatment for bragging to congress…. and the Deep State CIA “whistleblower” gets a politely worded letter that can be ignored.



So no, Trump couldn't.

Without pressure from Joe Biden, European diplomats, the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations, Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev.

COURTNEY SUBRAMANIAN