The whole "tat" thing has me a little concerned because again, a lot of ladies such as myself have tattoo's because we like them, not because we have been "branded" by anyone.
Originally Posted by Guilty Pleasures
The sub-culture of pimps whether in Dallas, California, Memphis or any other city that has pimps and a stable has shown a marked tendency to brand their stable with a distinctive tat.
I've heard from numerous providers that many girls have been told if her former pimp ever meets one of his "stock" that has had the tat covered up or removed, he would kill her so that is why many providers still have them and refuse when young once they leave that sort to either have them laser-ed off or covered up.
It is not just tattoos. it is the specific location and symbol of well known pimps that draw attention.
"Dallas" brands his stock with his name under the hair line on the back of her neck.
The crown tattoo is well known in this area as a "brand" by those who actually pay attention and I need to dig up an archived hard drive to see how many providers with that specific tat i can find and post in a separate thread.
Yes, having a tattoo, even on your tit in pimp script, does not mean you are pimped. That's a given.
BUT having a specific well known tattoo that is associated with a pimp? Not so much. Yes, at some point, maybe even currently, she had a pimp who branded her.