Minneapolis City Council announces intent to disband police department

LexusLover's Avatar
The club owner can't confirm that Floyd and Chauvin knew each other. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Correction: "The club owner" DIDN'T "confirm that ......" .... there will be some follow up information that will probably "refresh" her recollection in subsequent "interviews" by FBI/DOJ investigators ... particularly if they wander off into the weeds regarding allegations of passing fake bills and suggestions of passing along information to the Secret Service for "further investigation"!

If you know much about bar owners they really don't want the Treasury digging around in their business.
bambino's Avatar
Apples and oranges.

One is a private enterprise and the other is a government agency.

And in true fashion for your posts you misquoted what I posted:



Again .... why can't you be honest in your discussions? Originally Posted by LexusLover
It’s you that’s being dishonest because you opened your pie hole without knowing the situation.originally, you didn’t know they worked at the same nightclub. Maybe be she does know but didn’t want to share it with a reporter.,I wouldn’t blame her for that. And yes, private businesses and government institutions are different. It’s more important to know if you have a bad apple in the police department. Because look at the damage that is caused by a bad cop. Now run along.
bambino's Avatar
Correction: "The club owner" DIDN'T "confirm that ......" .... there will be some follow up information that will probably "refresh" her recollection in subsequent "interviews" by FBI/DOJ investigators ... particularly if they wander off into the weeds regarding allegations of passing fake bills and suggestions of passing along information to the Secret Service for "further investigation"!

If you know much about bar owners they really don't want the Treasury digging around in their business. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Now you’re talking in circles.
LexusLover's Avatar
Now you’re talkative by in circles. Originally Posted by bambino
That's it? That's all you got say?

"talkative by"?

It is a "circle"! Ever been in one of those "meetings"?
bambino's Avatar
That's it? That's all you got say?

"talkative by"?

It is a "circle"! Ever been in one of those "meetings"? Originally Posted by LexusLover
You missed my prior post. But you and Speedy are good at circle jerks. When’s the fight of the century? Will Sports Illustrated set the odds?
LexusLover's Avatar
It’s you that’s being dishonest because you opened your pie hole without knowing the situation.originally, you didn’t know they worked at the same nightclub. Maybe be she does know but didn’t want to share it with a reporter.,I wouldn’t blame her for that. And yes, private businesses and government institutions are different. It’s more important to know if you have a bad apple in the police department. Because look at the damage that is caused by a bad cop. Now run along. Originally Posted by bambino
Thank you for admitting you were wrong. You could have made it shorter!

You're starting to post like SpeedFluffer!
LexusLover's Avatar
.... the police where at the wrong house ..... What is the probability (and legal basis) for recovering damages from the police and the judge who signed the warrant and the city? Originally Posted by gnadfly
.... wrong house/address happens more than you might suspect ....

.... wrong person also ....

I wouldn't expand it out to the Judge who is relying on the representations of LE who relied upon a "reliable informant" ...

if the error was a typo or based on wrong information provided to them .... (there are some neighborhoods where no house numbers are displayed on houses and/or apt buildings without numbers/letters on doors ....) ... using a pic of the house is also a problem sometimes.

... as for the killing of the female ... it depended on what she was doing and what they were doing ....

... the last I saw one has to select between the individual officer and the agency/city with the latter having to have some policy for conducting the activity in an offensive manner ... there are elements of failure to train and/or supervise etc. but those have to be knowingly done or not done.

It's not simple ... the facts can be tricky. So can the election! Some of the decision has to do with any potential insurance coverage ... customarily "errors and omissions" coverage is for an individual and not an agency. Another consideration is often you will end up in Federal court where jurors may not be as "friendly" to a bandit's squeeze who got in a gunfight with invading officers with a search warrant!
LexusLover's Avatar
You missed my prior post. But you and Speedy are good at circle jerks. When’s the fight of the century? Will Sports Illustrated set the odds? Originally Posted by bambino
Are you talking to yourself, again? You really get butt-hurt when you're wrong.
LexusLover's Avatar
It’s you that’s being dishonest because you opened your pie hole without knowing the situation.originally, .... Originally Posted by bambino
Did you "KNOW" the "SITUATION ORIGINALLY"? Go ahead and lie some more!

All I've posted is the theme of "wait and see" ... you on the otherhand ... speaking of "pie holes" .... blabber like you were standing there the whole time. I questioned whether the owner didn't know these too guys new each other ... when folks were talking shit like it was a proven fact ... that wasn't you was it? I think Gnad was the first to raise that question to what the owner said originally.

Don't compare me to SpeedoFluffer ... you two are twins ....