so what happens when Kyle Rittenhouse is acquitted?

Yep, just an observation. Nothing more. Carry on. Originally Posted by Little Monster

are ya gonna send flowers to Phillip the royal putz's funeral?


BAHHAHAA

I didn't read everyone else. You like them young then...or am I presuming too much from your words? Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Do you think I am playing your silly games with that absurdity? Do you want me to say that he was a 40 year old adult running around with a gun? Don't try to outsmart me. Trust me, it's a waste of your time... stick to the topic of the thread and the fact of the age of stupid fake Rambo looking for a fight on the streets in the cheese state.

Be glad I don't RTM anything because if I did, I would definitely RTM what you are inferring what I like. Hell, you should be kicked out of here for that sick shit alone. Be an adult. There is no need to stoop that low with an unacceptable inference like that about a minor.

You already been played and you don't even know it. Ask a question and you get pissy. So I take it that means NO?

I've read more into this issue and I'm going to reserve my judgement on the actions of Kyle Rittenhouse until more information / investigation is done. However I will reiterate my opinion on his actions.


Just because you have the legal right to carry a firearm does not make it a good idea. Deciding to cross state lines to participate in a ad hoc gathering whose stated purpose was to protect private property, without the permission or invitation from the actual owner of the property or invited or have any affiliation with the "Militia" who might or might not have been invited all while carrying a newly purchased semi-automatic rifle is just about the most insane idea I've ever heard of.

Good wisdom from txdot.

I've read more into this issue and I'm going to reserve my judgement on the actions of Kyle Rittenhouse until more information / investigation is done. However I will reiterate my opinion on his actions.


Just because you have the legal right to carry a firearm does not make it a good idea. Deciding to cross state lines to participate in a ad hoc gathering whose stated purpose was to protect private property, without the permission or invitation from the actual owner of the property or invited or have any affiliation with the "Militia" who might or might not have been invited all while carrying a newly purchased semi-automatic rifle is just about the most insane idea I've ever heard of. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Rittenhouse and his friend were asked to protect the property they were at, a car lot.

you need to do some homework on this. it's been known from the start that they were asked to protect that property, by the owner.

I don't have any idea what that has to do with my friend I had to cut ties with and he is white but whatever because I want no part of what he is doing now. It has nothing to do with Covid or BLM. It has everything to do with him being crooked now that I don't want any part of and signing off on anything for him... I thought I was pretty clear about that... I was exchanging posts with Gaston by the way about the military.

It's funny to me how many of you like to twist and turn things that make no fucking sense to any logical person. I'm not exactly sure what my response to Gaston had to do with unemployment checks, stimulus checks, Covid and BLM. Hell, I even quoted the man in my response to him. It's not like it was a complicated puzzle to put together in my post. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

Simple, the BLM President was not paying herself a salary like you said your friend was not doing. Yet, he bought himself, according to you a mercedes and she 4 houses. They're crooked and have little chance of being put in jail. Why? Because the Feds are to busy working from home to enforce scams. Who organized the riots? BLM. Not that hard to understand.

I've read more into this issue and I'm going to reserve my judgement on the actions of Kyle Rittenhouse until more information / investigation is done. However I will reiterate my opinion on his actions.
... Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Nice for you to wait. Be careful what you read.

Waco
Can you please provide proof that he was formally aske to provide defense to the dealership? I also asked for proof who drove him to the scene earlier, but didn't see a reply. Sorry if I missed it, but please repost as a courtesy.

Waco
Can you please provide proof that he was formally aske to provide defense to the dealership? I also asked for proof who drove him to the scene earlier, but didn't see a reply. Sorry if I missed it, but please repost as a courtesy. Originally Posted by reddog1951

I second this request. I would like to see a statement from someone that they were requested to come.

I've read more into this issue and I'm going to reserve my judgement on the actions of Kyle Rittenhouse until more information / investigation is done. However I will reiterate my opinion on his actions.


Just because you have the legal right to carry a firearm does not make it a good idea. Deciding to cross state lines to participate in a ad hoc gathering whose stated purpose was to protect private property, without the permission or invitation from the actual owner of the property or invited or have any affiliation with the "Militia" who might or might not have been invited all while carrying a newly purchased semi-automatic rifle is just about the most insane idea I've ever heard of. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Kind of like those Tennesseans who went to the Alamo...

Kind of like those Tennesseans who went to the Alamo... Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

There is a giant difference between the Mexican army and black lives matter protesters.

The Police, and the national guard if needed or federal agents were around to contain the violence. Adding citizens with guns into the mix just amped up the violence and made things harder for the authorities to contain. In my opinion this was purely a matter of vigilantism run amok.

There is a giant difference between the Mexican army and black lives matter protesters.

The Police, and the national guard if needed or federal agents were around to contain the violence. Adding citizens with guns into the mix just amped up the violence and made things harder for the authorities to contain. In my opinion this was purely a matter of vigilantism run amok. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

you omit the fact that the police and guard were hamstrung from doing their job in the first place. if not for that, none of this would have gotten out of control. same in Chicago and Portland. they enabled these riots.

Waco, Waco, Bueller, are you there? Maybe a day off (can be read two ways)? Inquiring minds await.

you omit the fact that the police and guard were hamstrung from doing their job in the first place. if not for that, none of this would have gotten out of control. same in Chicago and Portland. they enabled these riots. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

If I understand correctly, you are stating that the police and guard enabled the riots??

If I understand correctly, you are stating that the police and guard enabled the riots?? Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Per lib current definitions. YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!