Sure, whatever you say.I was saying the far right were, and continue, killing minorities before cities were even formed for them to marginalize minorities.
Who is most likely to get killed by someone of a different race?
A black guy walking down the street in Beverly Hills?
A white guy walking down the street in South Central?
Actually a black man walking down the wrong street in South Central is much more likely to get killed by another black man than he is to be killed in the whitest part of any city in the country.
So who is really killing who?
Here's a stat I am sure you'll love. More black men were killed in just one city by other black men than all the black men killed by the police in the entire country combined.
Now what were you saying about the extreme right killing minorities? Originally Posted by GaGambler
Tyranny of the majority? How about "rule of the majority"?
James Madison’s Ideas on Protecting the Opulent Minority Against the Tyranny of the Majority
https://elpidiovaldes.wordpress.com/...-majority/amp/
James Madison, fourth President of the United States (1809 – 1817) is hailed as the “Father of the Constitution”. He and the rest of the forefathers understood the dangers of democracy all too well, so they set out to create a system which would protect their interests, in other words the interests of the ruling minority.
Sounds like Marxist propaganda, right? It’s actually all spelled out for us in the Federalist Papers.
Full Text of The Federalist Papers - Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History - Research Guides at Library of Congress
https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-pa...alistPapers-10
The only thing in the proposed Constitution, which wears the appearance of confining the causes of federal cognizance to the federal courts, is contained in this passage: "The JUDICIAL POWER of the United States SHALL BE VESTED in one Supreme Court, and in SUCH inferior courts as the Congress shall from time to time ordain and establish."This might either be construed to signify, that the supreme and subordinate courts of the Union should alone have the power of deciding those causes to which their authority is to extend; or simply to denote, that the organs of the national judiciary should be one Supreme Court, and as many subordinate courts as Congress should think proper to appoint; or in other words, that the United States should exercise the judicial power with which they are to be invested, through one supreme tribunal, and a certain number of inferior ones, to be instituted by them.
That's the truth, Ruth.