The majority of votes, not voters. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeOnly in fantasy land. 100+ court cases tried. All have failed. Fox lied about it and paid $787 million. In the real world, when most of them turn out to vote, the majority of American voters trust Democrats more than they trust republicans. You can keep repeating a lie that a con man told you as often as you want, but that will never make it become true.
Only in fantasy land. 100+ court cases tried. All have failed. Fox lied about it and paid $787 million. In the real world, when most of them turn out to vote, the majority of American voters trust Democrats more than they trust republicans. You can keep repeating a lie that a con man told you as often as you want, but that will never make it become true. Originally Posted by 1pittsburghJ doesn't believe that certain votes count. You literally have to be a certain kind of male landowner to have a voice using his particular spin on 1776 norms.
J doesn't believe that certain votes count. Originally Posted by HDGristleYes, the ones that show up in duffle bags at 3am.
You literally have to be a certain kind of male landowner to have a voice using his particular spin on 1776 norms.Clearly that was satirical, but it should absolutely be more difficult to vote. Show up on election day, pass a short exam that indicates you have a basic understanding of government, and you’re good to go. I’m safe. You’re safe. I’d assume most posters here, given that they’re actively engaged in political banter, are safe as well. These are the kinds of people who SHOULD be voting, not those who don’t know the 3 branches of government or think July 4th is about hotdogs and fireworks. The country is run by idiots because they’re put there by their own kind.
These are the kinds of people who SHOULD be voting, not those who don’t know the 3 branches of government or think July 4th is about hotdogs and fireworks. The country is run by idiots because they’re put there by their own kind. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeMany of your political allies, who trust the republicans, are included amongst the ignorant.
Clearly that was satirical, but it should absolutely be more difficult to vote. Show up on election day, pass a short exam that indicates you have a basic understanding of government, and you’re good to go. I’m safe. You’re safe. I’d assume most posters here, given that they’re actively engaged in political banter, are safe as well. These are the kinds of people who SHOULD be voting, not those who don’t know the 3 branches of government or think July 4th is about hotdogs and fireworks. The country is run by idiots because they’re put there by their own kind. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeAgain, be careful what you wish for. Having to pass a basic civics exam would disqualify at least ⅓ of GOP voters (and nearly all trump voters).
Only in fantasy land. 100+ court cases tried. All have failed. Fox lied about it and paid $787 million. In the real world, when most of them turn out to vote, the majority of American voters trust Democrats more than they trust republicans. You can keep repeating a lie that a con man told you as often as you want, but that will never make it become true. Originally Posted by 1pittsburghAmen. They've all convinced themselves (because their favorite con man can't stop crying about it), but the reality is quite different.
Keep in mind that the elections are a much better indication of who the American voters trust than some small sample size poll is. Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh
I'm probably wasting my time trying to get people to understand a basic concept like sample size... Originally Posted by 1pittsburghTry me.
Again, be careful what you wish for. Having to pass a basic civics exam would disqualify at least ⅓ of GOP voters (and nearly all trump voters).... No ... It's a thread about the polling trend there
The thread is about who voters trust more. It's obvious, based on national popular voting, Americans trust Democrats more. Republicans haven't won a national popular vote since 2004. Originally Posted by tommy156
Try me.A reasonable person understands that you don't have to look up the sample size to know that it's exponentially smaller than that of the biggest poll, the national presidential election.
You claim the sample size for the OP's poll was too "small" - and therefore the poll results are unreliable and inaccurate, EVEN AS A SNAPSHOT IN TIME.
So please tell me, what exactly was the actual sample size used in the poll? Or should I say, in the POLLS, since the OP's graph plots how poll sentiment on this particular question has fluctuated over time from 1986 to now.
I assume you looked up the sample size number, right? Originally Posted by lustylad
A reasonable person understands that you don't have to look up the sample size to know that it's exponentially smaller than that of the biggest poll, the national presidential election. Originally Posted by 1pittsburghNo shit, sherlock!
It absolutely is a poll. When you vote you go to your polling place:Yep. Elections are the only polls that really matter. They are the only polls that come with consequences.
https://www.vote.pa.gov/Voting-in-PA...ing-place.aspx Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh
...it's been 19 years since they (American voters) trusted a republican more, and that was only because most were not yet aware that Dick and Bush lied. Originally Posted by 1pittsburghWrong!