Trump net keeps catching U.S. Citizens

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/27/u...-citizens.html

Citizens just keep seeming to catch shrapnel on this

wrong. there is no absolute right to film police arrests.



Limitations on Filming the Police

There may be certain limitations to a person’s ability to video record a police officer, even if it is legal to do so in their state. These limitations can include the following:

1. Interference with an officer’s duties: Recording a police officer may be restricted if it interferes with their ability to perform their duties. For example, suppose a person’s recording prevents an officer from communicating with others, following through on an arrest, or maintaining safety. In that case, the person may be asked to stop recording or to move to a different location.
2. Privacy concerns: Recording a police officer in certain situations, such as inside a private residence, may be restricted if it violates the privacy of others.
3. Sensitive locations: Recording may be restricted in certain sensitive locations, such as courtrooms, schools, or hospitals, to protect the rights of others and maintain order.
4. Equipment restrictions: Some states or municipalities may have laws or policies restricting the use of certain equipment when recording police officers, such as drones or night vision goggles.
5. Harassment: Recording a police officer in a way that constitutes harassment or intimidation may be illegal.

Laws and regulations regarding filming police officers can vary from state to state and even by municipalities. Hence, it is best to consult with local authorities or a lawyer to know the specific laws that apply in your area.




any one of the above will do. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

And exactly zero of those were applicable here. He was well within his rights to film what he did. The proof? He wasn't charged with anything for filming.

He wasn't charged with anything for filming. Originally Posted by tommy156

Accurate

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/27/u...-citizens.html

Citizens just keep seeming to catch shrapnel on this Originally Posted by HDGristle

maybe these families shouldn't knowingly harbor illegals .... did you ever think of that? did they?

And exactly zero of those were applicable here. He was well within his rights to film what he did. The proof? He wasn't charged with anything for filming. Originally Posted by tommy156

Accurate Originally Posted by HDGristle

nonsense. he interfered with a police immigration issue. he can be stopped from filming and detained. and even arrested. he got off lucky.

This admin seems to have a hard-on for this particular citizen.
https://www.latintimes.com/us-citize...d-again-583987

This one has recieved judgment that his rights were violated during 1.0
https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/05/3...ce-detainment/

https://davisvanguard.org/2025/05/fe...tified-by-ice/

A U.S. Citizen was also stopped at the airport and grilled about his views on Trump and Israel.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/people-le...231428481.html

Well, they're mistakenly detaining U.S. Marshals now.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...hal-rcna211599

Pulling over and detaining citizens now for "looking illegal"

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2769786.html

Pulling over and detaining citizens now for "looking illegal"

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2769786.html Originally Posted by HDGristle

yet another nonsense article

once again .. my dude ... your breadcrumbs ..


let's see where they lead ..


“This is going to go one of two ways here. I need to see your ID — if you’re not the guy I’m looking for, you’re not the guy I’m looking for. But we need your ID," the ICE agent says in the video.


OOF! the lesson here .. comply with law enforcement. or else. the guy got pissy about simply showing his ID. would you? i'd just show them my ID and be on my way.


it's the law.


BAHHAAAAAAA

The New York Civil Liberties Union confirms that individuals are generally not required to show identification to law enforcement, unless they are operating a vehicle.

It hasn't been proven that he didn't comply with the law.

We do know that ICE has a history of profiling that had led to settlements limiting their authority to make these kinds of stops in some jurisdictions
https://www.cliniclegal.org/resource...d-make-arrests

Did the U.S. Marshal not comply with the law when ICE profiled him too?

It hasn't been proven that he didn't comply with the law.

We do know that ICE has a history of profiling that had led to settlements limiting their authority to make these kinds of stops in some jurisdictions
https://www.cliniclegal.org/resource...d-make-arrests

Did the U.S. Marshal not comply with the law when ICE profiled him too? Originally Posted by HDGristle

bad play. you lose. i knew you'd go for the State law issue. means nothing to Federal agents. no State law supersedes Federal law, yes?


thank you for playing the game.

I didn't specify a single law at a state or federal level. I shared a quote that also didn't specify a single law at the state or federal level. Ironically, neither have you

Mebbe consult a lawyer?

https://www.jeelani-law.com/rights-as-an-immigrant/

I didn't specify a single law. I shared a quote that also didn't specify a single law. Ironically, neither have you

Mebbe consult a lawyer?

https://www.jeelani-law.com/rights-as-an-immigrant/ Originally Posted by HDGristle

i love it when you get jacked and have to deflect. is this a strawman post? sounds like it to me!


i don't need to cite Federal laws. i correctly stated that all Federal laws supersedes State law. unless you can prove otherwise, captain!
'
bahahahaaaa

Sorry, Waco. Bad faith on your part.

bad play. you lose. i knew you'd go for the State law issue. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

This was where you introduced the strawman you're looking to derail with now

I'm more interested in the topic

Sorry, Waco. Bad faith on your part.



This was where you introduced the strawman you're looking to derail with now

I'm more interested in the topic

Originally Posted by HDGristle

bad faith that Federal law always supersedes state law? prove that wrong.



and your link is f'd up. won't play. probably won't make any difference to me anyway

Ooh, almost forgot about this one.

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/...lorida-sheriff

FL sheriff held a U.S. Citizen on an ICE detainer. Federal Judge ruled it was a violation of his 4th Amendment rights. An oldie, but an example of how Trump 2.0 is just as dangerous to he rights of citizens as Trump 1.0