It would be helpful for all future hearings if there were real consequences for lying to Congress under oath. Originally Posted by lustyladLol. Republicans too, right? When's the last time a Republican didn't lie to Congress under oath?
Lol. Republicans too, right? When's the last time a Republican didn't lie to Congress under oath?The last time you told the truth!!!! Which is a long time ago!
Originally Posted by jayzee43

And just like that James Comey and Tish James are no longer under the microscope of donald trump - and his doj. Judge tossed the cases this afternoon. Ho hum. Originally Posted by eyecu2Exactly as predicted by anyone who was paying attention. This is what happens when you fire all the competent lawyers and replace them pretty faces who are woefully out of their element.

��BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt gives NUCLEAR response to James Comey taking a victory lap that his indictment was dismissed over "procedural issues"They have to "in VERY short order". Funniest part is, they won't have enough time to gin up a new bullshit story before the statute of limitations runs out.
"The DOJ WILL BE APPEALING this in VERY short order!" Originally Posted by bambino
They have to "in VERY short order". Funniest part is, they won't have enough time to gin up a new bullshit story before the statute of limitations runs out.They don’t have to “gin” up a new story. Only flunkies think that this Libtard activist Judges ruling will stand.
Tick-tock, MAGA flunkiesOriginally Posted by jayzee43
They have to "in VERY short order". Funniest part is, they won't have enough time to gin up a new bullshit story before the statute of limitations runs out.They need their proverbial 2 weeks. It's likely going to get re-filed IMO. I think I saw that typically there is 6 months extensions when this shit happens.
Tick-tock, MAGA flunkiesOriginally Posted by jayzee43
.Lindsey Halligan needs to stop pretending to be a lawyer and stick to sucking cock on OnlyFans. She's much more qualified to do thatShe's an actual lawyer, but prosecutorial criminal law isn't her experience nor focus in the field. Clearly.
Originally Posted by jayzee43
Per Grok;What did Grok say about the statute of limitations on the Comey charge?
In law, dismissing a case "without prejudice" means it's ended for now, but the plaintiff can refile it later with the same claims. It's not a final judgment on the merits, unlike "with prejudice," which bars refiling.
BAHAHAHA Originally Posted by bambino