SEALS Respond to Obama Campaign

Odumbo worked against the war effort while in the Senate. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Oh? How so?

Odumbo campaigned against the war while running for the presidency.

The Iraq war, yes.

NOW Odumbo wants to use the war to win re-election!?!

No, he wants to use his ending the war to win re-election.

Odumbo is a lying hypocrite, Doofus.

I think your post shows who the real lying hypocrite is.

Plus, the narrator -- Slick Willie -- of Odumbo's crappy commercial completely FAILED to deal with bin Laden while he was in office: Slick Willie expressing doubt about Romney's resolve? Fucking boundless hypocrisy!!!

The fact that he was pre-occupied with the Republicans impeaching him for getting a blow job notwithstanding, during the vast majority of Clinton's presidency, OBL was little more than a 2-bit terrorist that hardly deserved the time of day - not someone who killed over 3000 people in one act.

It just galls you that a Democratic President got Bin Laden, doesn't it?

Good.

The fact that he was pre-occupied with the Republicans impeaching him for getting a blow job notwithstanding, during the vast majority of Clinton's presidency, OBL was little more than a 2-bit terrorist that hardly deserved the time of day - not someone who killed over 3000 people in one act.
Originally Posted by Doove

Odumbo is a hypocrite and liar, Slick Willie is a hypocrite and liar, and you, Doofus, are a hypocrite and liar. You lie Doofus, OBL killed hundreds and injured thousands of people while Clinton was in office, including hundreds of Americans. And you blatantly lie when you state Slick Willie was impeached for getting a blow job. You are a liar, Doofus.

Obama wanted to stay in Iraq. But the Iraqis forced him to adhere to the timetable set by President Bush. Obama gets NO credit for ending the war in Iraq.

And remember, he PROMISED to end them both, and instead got us in more military conflicts. And now he is itching to bomb Syria and Iran. Obama is a bigger war monger, and liar, than Bush/Cheney ever were.

Obama wanted to stay in Iraq. But the Iraqis forced him to adhere to the timetable set by President Bush. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Link?

And remember, he PROMISED to end them both,

So which is it? Did he promise to end them? Or did he end one of 'em only because of Iraqi demands?

and instead got us in more military conflicts.

Yup, to no more than assist in a war that was already going on with or without us, to get rid of Moammar Khadafi, without so much as one American casualty.

And now he is itching to bomb Syria and Iran. Obama is a bigger war monger, and liar, than Bush/Cheney ever were.

Link?

Tell ya what, when he actually starts a war, invades a country, for reasons that didn't exist.....get back to me.

In fact, in 2007 Romney is ON TAPE saying just the opposite .."move everything to get him"..... Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Well, since he's taken both sides of every other issue...

Bugtux will talk about Bush as long as the devil will listen.
Bush is the go to cover anytime Barack is exposed.
Typical response to deflect attention on the crassness of the idiot they elected.

I still wonder why they support this communist especially those that fought communism.
I suppose it could be because they did not beat the commies. If they did not beat the commies does that mean that the commies won? Wait we have a commie president, go figure.

Obama wanted to stay in Iraq. But the Iraqis forced him to adhere to the timetable set by President Bush. Obama gets NO credit for ending the war in Iraq.

And remember, he PROMISED to end them both, and instead got us in more military conflicts. And now he is itching to bomb Syria and Iran. Obama is a bigger war monger, and liar, than Bush/Cheney ever were. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Different spin than was reported that the Iraqies wanted the troops to stay,but would not give them immunity from prosecution in Iraqi's courts. so we left.

Sure, whatever you want to think.

http://www.therightscoop.com/brutal-...-the-football/

True enough. But it was especially obvious when Odumbo promised intangibles such as 'Hope and Change'. . Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Obama was the OTP(OriginalTea Party) before the TeaParty with that Hope and Change shit!

The lesson learned from Truman and the Marshall Plan was that rebuilding Germany and Japan was cheaper -- in lives and treasure -- than fighting them every twenty years.
. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Great way to transfer wealth in this country from the middle class worker to the Defense related industries.

And that seems to be short term thinking! Now we pay for their security of these countries that provide their citizens with health care but we can not afford to. I would think we need to revise our thinking on this matter from 20 years to a 70 year outlook! LOL

It's a symbiotic relationship. The U.S. could forgo the high tech weapons, e.g., cruise missiles, etc., it currently enjoys, and thus starve the military industrial complex into nonexistence. But to do so would mean totally relying on a draft and issuing millions of American citizens basic rifles and bullets in the next conflagration involving U.S. interests abroad.
. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Oh I would so love that. Draft ever single last person if we truely wanted to fight a war. Keep the Navy and Air Force up to snuff and draft these chicken Hawks sons and daughters that scream for war. Poetic justice I say.

Again, that's what made Odumbo's 2008 promises for 'Hope and Change' so laughable. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yea, once you get to see what the big boys see all that fairness crap gets thrown out da window. We are in competition with all these other tribes over resources, just like since the beginning of time. Who ever gets into office will learn that. Our end of rule is getting near. We will be like England in another 50 years. It works the same for all Empires.

Obama should get credit for killing OBL. It happened on his watch, he made the call. The fact that you fanatical repukes are unable to give it to him reflects more on you and your standards than on him. If the mission had gone bad and some of those operators had been killed or captured, I bet you dumbasses would want to talk about it then, wouldn't you?

It drives you fucking crazy that he got him, doesn't it? lol....I love it. Keep chirping whirlygig, you brain-dead moron.

Of course you have to admit that Obama broke the law when he killed Bin Laden as per Executive order by Gerald Ford making it illegal to commit assassinations. So I guess you admit that Obama is a criminal then.

Also, we have a pretty good idea who opposes navy SEALs now.

The jokers in this saga are Obama and Clinton.

Obama in 2006 complained about political candidates using terrorism as a campgain wedge issue (http://www.therightscoop.com/obama-i...-our-politics/).

And Clinton was offered his chance to kill Bin Laden; and Clinton declined. Clinton's inaction costs us thousands of American lives !

The jokers in this saga are Obama and Clinton.

Obama in 2006 complained about political candidates using terrorism as a campgain wedge issue (http://www.therightscoop.com/obama-i...-our-politics/). Originally Posted by Whirlaway

There's a difference between claiming that 3000 people being butchered means America should vote for you (as Bush did) and claiming that killing the guy who killed 3000 people means America should vote for you (as Obama's doing).

And Clinton was offered his chance to kill Bin Laden; and Clinton declined. Clinton's inaction costs us thousands of American lives !

Clinton was offered his chance when OBL was a nobody. Bush was offered his chance when OBL was the biggest mass murderer in history.

Clinton was offered his chance when OBL was a nobody. Originally Posted by Doove

The FBI would disagree with your lying ass. BTW, Mao, Stalin and Hitler still rank as the greatest mass murderers in history, and Saddam did quite a number on the Kurds and Shi'ites (hundreds of thousands).