And this is the guy some people want to elect to President?

Denying the incident would only give it credence. He should ignore it. He's said enough, the libs will bury themselves if they persist. The libs have this election in the bag. Why are they trying to lose it?

Trust me, Obama doesn't want to compete with Romney on the character issue. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

If Soros' company is counting the votes, the election may just be a charade. I think it was Stalin that said, in elections, the only thing that matters is who counts the votes.

FAMILY OF ROMNEY’S ALLEGED BULLY VICTIM SPEAKS OUT: ‘THE PORTRAYAL OF JOHN IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fami...lly-incorrect/

Nice try liberal media! It's sad that there are more important issues facing our country and the media would rather go after Romney on a fabricated story in an effort to protect King Barack.

Stick to the real issues media, otherwise Romney will run over Obama in November. A social issues campaign against Romney will be foolish.

They are grasping at straws

They are grasping at straws Originally Posted by boardman

More like stawmen!

There were gays in the 60's? Originally Posted by boardman

Yes...but...Gay just meant you were a happy person.

In the 60's if you were a homosexual or a cigerette..you were called a fag.

SexyEx said the victim spoke out against this attack. The victim has been dead since 2004. Who is lying here?

The guys hair has already grown back, and years later fell out, but the poor dog that are president ate is still dead.

The family of the "victim" says that he wasn't gay and they never knew anything like what was alledged even happened... oh yeah, the guy is dead so we won't get his side of things. All we have is Obama's side of things. Wait I mean we only have the side of things from people who support Obama. Obama would never do anything for political reasons.

Now, let talk about Obama's enemies list and Mr. Vandersloot.

The Washington Post story is a lie. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Thank you Joe. But the Obamaniacs have already digested it, and believe it's true. They won't back off, they have too much invested. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

One of the five "witnesses" has already came out and admitted that he wasn't there. Can you say manufacturered? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Denying the incident would only give it credence. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Denying the incident would only give it credence? So you apologize for it instead? Are you serious with this stuff?

You all deny it ever happened, but Romney doesn't. What's wrong with this picture?

I may or may not remember specific incidents back from when i was in high-school. But while details may be sketchy, if someone accused me of something like this, i sure as hell know whether i was the type who would have done this, or whether i was the type who wouldn't have done something like this.

While i don't think it matters 50 years after the fact, he did it.

Why are you all in such a tizzy to deny it?

Cog,

I generally wouldn't give a flip about something that a guy did when he was a kid (something like this) IF AND ONLY IF he was willing to admit to it not try to lie and say he doesn't remember and then makes a formal apology to the person who he assaulted. But from what I am reading this is not the first time ole Mitt has done something like this.

Most people have all done something they are ashamed of from when they were young but what makes the difference is being accountable for it and making the necessary amends for it. Here Mitt had a perfect opportunity to relate to his victim and make a formal apology and maybe even say something against bullying which is so prevalent now in the deaths of so many kids who are currently being bullied in our school systems. But he didn't do that now did he? To me Cog that is a huge red flag and is very telling of his true character. Originally Posted by Sexyeccentric1

I'm still waiting for oboma to do the same, concerning his use and selling of coke.

Wow, it appears all this outrage is over the suggestion that someone who has been troubled by the incident since he heard about it a few weeks ago was reported to have been troubled by it since it happened 50 years ago.

And The Post has issued the correction.

Just wow.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/20...ref=fpnewsfeed

Wow, it appears all this outrage is over the suggestion that someone who has been troubled by the incident since he heard about it a few weeks ago was reported to have been troubled by it since it happened 50 years ago.

And The Post has issued the correction.

Just wow.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/20...ref=fpnewsfeed Originally Posted by Doove

Doofus, you do realize you just posted that The Washington Post had to issue a correction.because it reported a false story?

BTW, this story was posted in the Breitbart article COG cited earlier, so you are more than slow on the uptake.

[SIZE=3]Doofus, you do realize you just posted that The Washington Post had to issue a correction.because it reported a false story? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It got one minor aspect wrong, but the story in total was true. That's clear.

I think this issue is just an example of how you guys only need one little piece of evidence to allow you to believe whatever it is you wanna believe, regardless of what the weight of the evidence proves true.

The family of the "victim" says that he wasn't gay and they never knew anything like what was alledged even happened... oh yeah, the guy is dead so we won't get his side of things. All we have is Obama's side of things. Wait I mean we only have the side of things from people who support Obama. Obama would never do anything for political reasons.

Now, let talk about Obama's enemies list and Mr. Vandersloot. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It's convenient that Obama's buddies at the Washinton Post picked a dead man for his supposed victim. I doubt that's by accident.

I think it speaks pretty well for Romney's character that this bogus story from fifty years ago and the dog on top of the car story is all they've got against him.

The real story about Romney is just how squeaky clean he is. Eventually, if main stream media can't find any real dirt, or convince us to believe their lies, they'll tell us Romney's too clean to be president.

It's convenient that Obama's buddies at the Washinton Post picked a dead man for his supposed victim. I doubt that's by accident. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Yeah, let's ignore the fact that IT WAS ROMNEY'S FRIENDS WHO PICKED A DEAD MAN FOR HIS VICTIM.

The real story about Romney is just how squeaky clean he is. Eventually, if main stream media can't find any real dirt, or convince us to believe their lies, they'll tell us Romney's too clean to be president.

How do you get through life?