What is your take on this?

"No I do not feel like you hijacked my thread babe. I was just stating the obvious. Sorry you didnt feel as if this thread was thought provoking enough for you. ( not really)"


Oh, I’m sorry, babe. It’s good to see that you have a profound grasp on the obvious. I just hope you are equally skilled at reading between the lines. (Yes really) Originally Posted by GymRat

P.s. I am very skilled, reading between the lines is one of many.

I am through now have fun hijacking if that is your intent. I have no hard feelings for though who judge me.

To make an arm or shoulder tattoo really stand out and be noticeable, cover it with chewing tobacco while you are in the tanning booth.

Beauty tip from Jeff Foxworthy.

Saturday Night Live had a commercial for "Tramp Stamp Remover". It showed a time lapse of a woman's "Tramp Stamp" from her 20s to her 60s. The "Tramp Stamp" had the word "Juicy" across it.

Funny stuff!

Can i request to close this please? Originally Posted by SexyCassandra

Yes you can but unless it's taken a TERRIBLE turn for the worst, which it hasn't...it'll will most likely stay open

Members may use the "Unsubscribe from this thread" under the "thread tools" drop down box if they wish to no longer view it....or hell, just don't click on it



Oh yeah, nice tats!

Okay..... And thanks DickEmDown!!

When I grew up, only drunken G.I.s, white trash and Hell's Angels got tattoos. Now you can't play in the NFL without a full sleeve and dreads. Don't get either. Tattoos and/or piercings do not enhance a woman's appearance.

I find tattoos incredibly sexy on certain women.

I also find that they can be extremely helpful. Heh!




--
Okay, seriously

On certain women, it just works and it lights my candles.

Here are a few area providers whom I find incredibly sexy



This woman is 47 years old and is strikingly beautiful. She'd ruin the beauty if she were all tatted-up, right?








Wrong! I thinck she's still just as beautiful, if not more so..

**When you look at this image, you begin to realize that we live in a culture that considers duck lips and orange tans beautiful and this smut and dirty.**




Same thing with this woman. Love the flower



So yeah...on some women tattoos just work. It's all subjective and we all have our own likes/dislikes. To me, it just depends on that individual whether I find it appealing or not.

But at the end of the day, it was their decision and I respect that.

.

.

Hey sofaking, to each his own, but yeah those tats do distract from that woman's beauty. Sure she is still beautiful. In the same way a lamborghini is still a beautiful car even if you put tassels, curb feelers, and fuzzy dice on it.

Everyone's pretty much nailed it at this point, but since I clicked on this MF'er and read all 5 pages (so far), I'm going to say something for my trouble

Conservative tats are OK, but when you look like you crash landed into a paint factory, that's just a huge turnoff. Or when you see her from a distance you think, 'damn, what's wrong with her?', and you get a little closer and go, 'oh, it's just a tattoo.' Nothing beats a young, sweet, tender, perfectly shaped woman's body with no art on it, though. Some tats ARE nice, actually. Some are overdone. Full body tats, sleeves, tats that cover a large portion......naah.

I like gymrat's point as well. Tats DO look better on people that are buff or in shape. A lard ass with a tat, to me, just looks silly. No offense to anyone. That said, if you're 'decorating' your body, why not keep it in shape? Just saying.

Hey sofaking, to each his own, but yeah those tats do distract from that woman's beauty. Sure she is still beautiful. In the same way a lamborghini is still a beautiful car even if you put tassels, curb feelers, and fuzzy dice on it. Originally Posted by spear88

I can handle them, but anything that draws my attention from her beautiful face and those gorgeous eyes I consider distracting. I also think about what she'll look like 10-20 years later, which was probably not in consideration when she got them. Body art is a matter of personal taste and I would rather see her like that than her chest covered in tats. That would take away from her beauty.

Well since everyone seems to have an opinion on what people should look like if they have tats, I guess Ill share my opinion....
In my opinion Huge Buff guys are gross, especially the ones with bulging necks with the veins sticking out, putting a tattoo on that does not make it anymore appealing to me.
Having definition and being tone is sexy to me, yes.
My weakness are the men that are a little pudgy, have glasses, throw some tats in there, thats enough for me to rape someone.
Not really lol. But I would definitely be considering it.

So yet again, its all about preference.

I can handle them, but anything that draws my attention from her beautiful face and those gorgeous eyes I consider distracting. I also think about what she'll look like 10-20 years later, which was probably not in consideration when she got them. Body art is a matter of personal taste and I would rather see her like that than her chest covered in tats. That would take away from her beauty. Originally Posted by surcher

I do understand, however I think technology will be far more advanced . So in 10-20 years tattoo removal I believe will be more common, cheaper and less painful.
If people are regretful about there tats I think they will go that route.

Little pudgy.. looks like a I need to get a few tats and visit a certain someone. ;-)

I, personally, dig the tats. I hate to say this one thing, as it may sound odd - but I feel that if the artwork is bad, or it looks like someone grabbed a Groupon for their tat work, then that makes for some distraction.

However, for the most part, ink for me is a turn-on.

Being buff doesn't mean a guy has to have freakishly developed body parts with veins bulging so much that they look like snakes crawling up his arm. Anyone who is 'in shape', with reasonable muslce tone can be classified as 'buff'. Tight stomach, nice arms and chest, but nothing freakish, is ideal. I don't care for the roided up, HULK, Bane look myself. It's hard to do accomplish, actually. Hard work, ummm 'enhanced' help (somtimes), near perfect diets, and good genetics all contribute to that look. Women, too. Nice muscle tone, but in a feminine kind of way, all curvy in the right places, that kind of stuff

Even still, the tats have to be done tastefully, even on someone with a nice physique.

chubby guys take the cake........not muscles. Thats just me though..... Women do look good tone and in shape with tats. I do agree!