Personally I Have 2 tats(Ones not finished yet) and plan to get many more in the future. I dont care what people think. Its my body and my own expression.
On the other hand a client with Tats...Man he better be ready to get attacked
I like art work on a women's body. I find it erotic. I do not care for names or initials, that is not art work. Having said that, I am not going to pick one woman over another simply because her art work or lack thereof.
Tats used to be unique or exciting... you know that 'naughty' factor. Kinda like a hardwood floor used to be. Now nearly everyone and their grandmother has em, so its lost its edge. So long as they are well done, not tacky or really nasty looking its cool and doesn't bother me at all.
Its almost gotten to the point where I may post an ISO for bush and no tats, just for variety.
I prefer no tatts as a general rule but have been becoming more tolerant as of late. Sorry but huge tats that cover large areas of beautiful skin are very distracting to me. However as we all know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and is different for every individual. Besides its nearly impossible to find women without them especially among the younger crowd. Some will remember the days when the upscale strip clubs wouldn't hire girls with tatoos. Today it is doubtful that they could staff a shift if such rules were still in place.
Depends on what they are. Tasteful is good, pimp/gang brandings..NOt cool. And sometimes these can look pretty tasteful because the branding is actually camo'd inside tasteful lookin ones
It is just personal preference. I have never seen a tatoo that I thought made a woman more attractive. I have seen some that made her much less attractive to me.
Maybe there should be a sticky "Do You Like Tattoos, What is Your Favorite Position, Is My Dick Too Big, Do You Offer Birthday and / or End of Month Specials, and Why Won't You See Black Guys"
thread?
As for the subject at hand, not a deal maker or breaker for me.