Looming Sequester

Those things don't have to happen, FastGoon you incredible fool. The sequester is only a cut in the planned INCREASE in spending! THERE ARE NO CUTS IN THE SEQUESTER! Obama is playing politics with people's lives. He is a narcissistic despot with delusions of grandeur. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

FG and a few others will never get it.

"The Sky Is Falling Friday"! Bawhahahaha!

Gawd, you are stupid, BiSex, we've already added in the Executive and Judicial branches. You need to have someone who can read faster read this stuff to you. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

We will mark StupidOldLyingFart down for the Executive Branch having sole authority to appoint Supreme Court Justices due to the layoff of the entire Legislative Branch! I suppose this is his distorted version of "checks and balances."

Does anyone care to join SOLF on his island?

Try . . . reading . . . more . . . slowly . . . BiSex. . . . You . . . are . . . missing . . . too . . . much . . . and . . . sounding . . . stupider . . . than . . . normal.

<<< BiSex

Try . . . reading . . . more . . . slowly . . . BiSex. . . . You . . . are . . . missing . . . too . . . much . . . and . . . sounding . . . stupider . . . than . . . normal. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I did read your exact post and this is exactly what I read.


QUOTE=CuteOldGuy;1052424190][/QUOTE]

We will mark StupidOldLyingFart down for the Executive Branch having sole authority to appoint Supreme Court Justices due to the layoff of the entire Legislative Branch! I suppose this is his distorted version of "checks and balances."

Does anyone care to join SOLF on his island? (PS, I don't belong on his island!)

Well, that is true, I AM in favor of laying off the entire Legislative Branch, and after careful consideration, I am laying off the Executive and Judicial Branches as well.

Well, that is true, I AM in favor of laying off the entire Legislative Branch, and after careful consideration, I am laying off the Executive and Judicial Branches as well. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Amend the above statement to read that StupidOldLyingFart is against all three branches of the Federal Government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) as outlined in the United State Constitution.

It appears that SOLF has painted yourself into another corner.

Well, that is true, I AM in favor of laying off the entire Legislative Branch, and after careful consideration, I am laying off the Executive and Judicial Branches as well. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

That would be an excellent way to cut some spending. They can't spend if no one is there.

Maybe forced retirement and replacements for all would be better way to say it.

Actually, BiSex, I want to lay them off because they do not follow the Constitution. If they did, we wouldn't be having all the trouble we are now. Their job is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Since they aren't doing that, their jobs are irrelevant, and a needless expenditure.

Actually, BiSex, I want to lay them off because they do not follow the Constitution. If they did, we wouldn't be having all the trouble we are now. Their job is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Since they aren't doing that, their jobs are irrelevant, and a needless expenditure. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

StupidOldLyingFart's Dilemma!

What to do next? (Where's a helicopter when he need's one?)

Amend the above statement to read that StupidOldLyingFart is against all three branches of the Federal Government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) as outlined in the United State Constitution.

It appears that SOLF has painted yourself into another corner.

Originally Posted by bigtex

Q: Is Whiny off his game again?

A: DEPENDS!

Q: Is Whiny off his game again? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I have to hand it to StupidOldLyingFart. He is consistent!



Consistently Stupid!

Well, I suppose that DEPENDS on your point of view.